Feed for /1995/related/acts/436 PDF
345.24 (1) A person arrested under s. 346.63 (1) or (5) or an ordinance in conformity therewith or s. 346.63 (2) or (6) or 940.25, or s. 940.09 where the offense involved the use of a vehicle, may not be released until 12 hours have elapsed from the time of his or her arrest or unless a chemical test administered under s. 343.305 shows that there is 0.04% or less by weight of alcohol in the person's blood or 0.04 grams or less of alcohol in 210 liters of the person's breath the person has an alcohol concentration of less than 0.04, but the person may be released to his or her attorney, spouse, relative or other responsible adult at any time after arrest.
436,19 Section 19. 346.63 (2) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:
346.63 (2) (b) In an action under this subsection, the defendant has a defense if he or she proves by a preponderance of the evidence that the injury would have occurred even if he or she had been exercising due care and he or she had not been under the influence of an intoxicant or a controlled substance or a combination thereof, under the influence of any other drug to a degree which renders him or her incapable of safely driving, or under the combined influence of an intoxicant and any other drug to a degree which renders him or her incapable of safely driving or did not have a blood prohibited alcohol concentration described under par. (a) 2.
436,20 Section 20. 346.63 (2m) of the statutes is amended to read:
346.63 (2m) If a person has not attained the age of 19, the person may not drive or operate a motor vehicle while he or she has a blood an alcohol concentration of more than 0.0% 0.0 but not more than 0.1% by weight of alcohol in the person's blood or more than 0.0 grams but not more than 0.1 grams of alcohol in 210 liters of that person's breath 0.1. One penalty for violation of this subsection is suspension of a person's operating privilege under s. 343.30 (1p). The person is eligible for an occupational license under s. 343.10 at any time. If a person arrested for a violation of this subsection refuses to take a test under s. 343.305, the refusal is a separate violation and the person is subject to revocation of the person's operating privilege under s. 343.305 (10) (em).
436,21 Section 21. 346.63 (7) (a) 1. of the statutes is amended to read:
346.63 (7) (a) 1. While having any measured an alcohol concentration above 0.0.
436,22 Section 22. 350.01 (1h) of the statutes is created to read:
350.01 (1h) "Alcohol concentration" has the meaning given in s. 340.01 (1v).
436,23 Section 23. 350.101 (1) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:
350.101 (1) (b) Operating with alcohol concentrations at or above specified levels. No person may engage in the operation of a snowmobile while the person has a blood an alcohol concentration of 0.1% 0.1 or more by weight of alcohol in his or her blood. No person may engage in the operation of a snowmobile while the person has 0.1 grams or more of alcohol in 210 liters of his or her breath.
436,24 Section 24. 350.101 (1) (c) of the statutes is amended to read:
350.101 (1) (c) Operating with alcohol concentrations at specified levels; below age 19. If a person has not attained the age of 19, the person may not engage in the operation of a snowmobile while he or she has a blood an alcohol concentration of more than 0.0% 0.0 but not more than 0.1% by weight of alcohol in his or her blood or more than 0.0 grams but not more than 0.1 grams of alcohol in 210 liters of his or her breath 0.1.
436,25 Section 25. 350.101 (2) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:
350.101 (2) (b) Causing injury with alcohol concentrations at or above specified levels. No person who has a blood an alcohol concentration of 0.1% 0.1 or more by weight of alcohol in his or her blood may cause injury to another person by the operation of a snowmobile. No person who has 0.1 grams or more of alcohol in 210 liters of his or her breath may cause injury to another person by the operation of a snowmobile.
436,26 Section 26. 350.101 (2) (d) of the statutes is amended to read:
350.101 (2) (d) Defenses. In an action under this subsection, the defendant has a defense if he or she proves by a preponderance of the evidence that the injury would have occurred even if he or she had been exercising due care and he or she had not been under the influence of an intoxicant or did not have a blood an alcohol concentration of 0.1% or more by weight of alcohol in his or her blood or 0.1 grams or more of alcohol in 210 liters of his or her breath.
436,27 Section 27. 350.107 of the statutes is amended to read:
350.107 Officer's action after arrest for operating a snowmobile while under influence of intoxicant. A person arrested for a violation of s. 350.101 (1) (a) or (b) or a local ordinance in conformity therewith or s. 350.101 (2) (a) or (b) may not be released until 12 hours have elapsed from the time of his or her arrest or unless a chemical test administered under s. 350.104 (1) (a) shows that there is 0.05% or less by weight of alcohol in the person's blood or 0.05 grams or less of alcohol in 210 liters of the person's breath the person has an alcohol concentration of 0.05 or less, but the person may be released to his or her attorney, spouse, relative or other responsible adult at any time after arrest.
436,28 Section 28. 885.235 (1) (a) 1. of the statutes is amended to read:
885.235 (1) (a) 1. The fact that the analysis shows that there was more than 0.0% but less than 0.08% by weight of alcohol in the person's blood or more than 0.0 grams but less than 0.08 grams of alcohol in 210 liters of the person's breath the person had an alcohol concentration of more than 0.0 but less than 0.08 is relevant evidence on the issue of being under the combined influence of alcohol and a controlled substance or any other drug, but, except as provided in par. (d) or sub. (1m), is not to be given any prima facie effect.
436,29 Section 29. 885.235 (1) (a) 2. of the statutes is amended to read:
885.235 (1) (a) 2. The fact that the analysis shows that there was more than 0.0% but less than 0.1% by weight of alcohol in the person's blood or more than 0.0 grams but less than 0.1 grams of alcohol in 210 liters of the person's breath the person had an alcohol concentration of more than 0.0 but less than 0.1 is relevant evidence on the issue of being under the combined influence of alcohol and a controlled substance or any other drug but, except as provided in par. (d) or sub. (1m), is not to be given any prima facie effect.
436,30 Section 30. 885.235 (1) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:
885.235 (1) (b) Except with respect to the operation of a commercial motor vehicle as provided in par. (d), the fact that the analysis shows that there was more than 0.04% but less than 0.1% by weight of alcohol in the person's blood or more than 0.04 grams but less than 0.1 grams of alcohol in 210 liters of the person's breath the person had an alcohol concentration of more than 0.04 but less than 0.1 is relevant evidence on the issue of intoxication or an alcohol concentration of 0.1 or more but is not to be given any prima facie effect.
436,31 Section 31. 885.235 (1) (bd) of the statutes is amended to read:
885.235 (1) (bd) Except with respect to the operation of a commercial motor vehicle as provided in par. (d), the fact that the analysis shows that there was more than 0.04% but less than 0.08% by weight of alcohol in the person's blood or more than 0.04 grams but less than 0.08 grams of alcohol in 210 liters of the person's breath the person had an alcohol concentration of more than 0.04 but less than 0.08 is relevant evidence on the issue of intoxication or an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more, but is not to be given any prima facie effect.
436,32 Section 32. 885.235 (1) (c) of the statutes is amended to read:
885.235 (1) (c) The fact that the analysis shows that there was 0.1% or more by weight of alcohol in the person's blood or 0.1 grams or more of alcohol in 210 liters of the person's breath the person had an alcohol concentration of 0.1 or more is prima facie evidence that he or she was under the influence of an intoxicant and is prima facie evidence that he or she had an alcohol concentration of 0.1 or more.
436,33 Section 33. 885.235 (1) (cd) of the statutes is amended to read:
885.235 (1) (cd) In cases involving persons who have 2 or more prior convictions, suspensions or revocations, as counted under s. 343.307 (1), the fact that the analysis shows that there was 0.08% or more by weight of alcohol in the person's blood or 0.08 grams or more of alcohol in 210 liters of the person's breath the person had an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more is prima facie evidence that he or she was under the influence of an intoxicant and is prima facie evidence that he or she had an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more.
436,34 Section 34. 885.235 (1) (d) of the statutes is amended to read:
885.235 (1) (d) The fact that the analysis shows that there was 0.04% or more by weight of alcohol in the person's blood or 0.04 grams or more of alcohol in 210 liters of the person's breath the person had an alcohol concentration of 0.04 or more is prima facie evidence that he or she was under the influence of an intoxicant with respect to operation of a commercial motor vehicle and is prima facie evidence that he or she had an alcohol concentration of 0.04 or more.
436,35 Section 35. 885.235 (1m) of the statutes is amended to read:
885.235 (1m) In any action under s. 23.33 (4c) (a) 3., 346.63 (2m) or (7) or 350.101 (1) (c), evidence of the amount of alcohol in the person's blood at the time in question, as shown by chemical analysis of a sample of the person's blood or urine or evidence of the amount of alcohol in the person's breath, is admissible on the issue of whether he or she had a blood an alcohol concentration in the range specified in s. 23.33 (4c) (a) 3., 346.63 (2m) or 350.101 (1) (c) or a measured an alcohol concentration above 0.0 under s. 346.63 (7) if the sample was taken within 3 hours after the event to be proved. The fact that the analysis shows that there was more than 0.0% but not more than 0.1% by weight of alcohol in the person's blood or more than 0.0 grams but not more than 0.1 grams of alcohol in 210 liters of the person's breath the person had an alcohol concentration of more than 0.0 but not more than 0.1 is prima facie evidence that the person had a blood an alcohol concentration in the range specified in s. 23.33 (4c) (a) 3., 346.63 (2m) or 350.101 (1) (c) or a measured an alcohol concentration above 0.0 under s. 346.63 (7).
436,36 Section 36. 885.235 (4) of the statutes is amended to read:
885.235 (4) The provisions of this section relating to the admissibility of chemical tests for alcohol concentration, or intoxication or blood alcohol concentration shall not be construed as limiting the introduction of any other competent evidence bearing on the question of whether or not a person was under the influence of an intoxicant, had a specified alcohol concentration or had a blood an alcohol concentration in the range specified in s. 23.33 (4c) (a) 3., 346.63 (2m) or 350.101 (1) (c).
436,37 Section 37. 905.04 (4) (f) of the statutes is amended to read:
905.04 (4) (f) Tests for intoxication. There is no privilege concerning the results of or circumstances surrounding any chemical tests for intoxication or blood alcohol concentration, as defined in s. 340.01 (1v).
436,38 Section 38. 939.22 (3) of the statutes is created to read:
939.22 (3) "Alcohol concentration" has the meaning given in s. 340.01 (1v).
436,39 Section 39. 940.09 (1g) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:
940.09 (1g) (b) Causes the death of another by the operation or handling of a firearm or airgun while the person has a blood an alcohol concentration of 0.1% 0.1 or more by weight of alcohol in that person's blood or 0.10 grams or more of alcohol in 210 liters of that person's breath.
436,40 Section 40. 940.09 (2) of the statutes is amended to read:
940.09 (2) The defendant has a defense if he or she proves by a preponderance of the evidence that the death would have occurred even if he or she had been exercising due care and he or she had not been under the influence of an intoxicant or did not have a blood an alcohol concentration described under sub. (1) (b) or (bm) or (1g) (b).
436,41 Section 41. 940.25 (2) of the statutes is amended to read:
940.25 (2) The defendant has a defense if he or she proves by a preponderance of the evidence that the great bodily harm would have occurred even if he or she had been exercising due care and he or she had not been under the influence of an intoxicant or did not have a blood an alcohol concentration described under sub. (1) (b) or (bm).
436,42 Section 42. 967.055 (1) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:
967.055 (1) (b) The legislature intends to encourage the vigorous prosecution of offenses concerning the operation of motorboats by persons under the influence of an intoxicant, a controlled substance or both to a degree which renders him or her incapable of operating a motorboat safely, or under the combined influence of an intoxicant and any other drug to a degree which renders him or her incapable of operating a motorboat safely or having a blood an alcohol concentration of 0.1% 0.1 or more.
Loading...
Loading...