DE 2.04(1)(c) (c) The applicant has not failed the central regional dental testing service clinical and laboratory demonstration examination, or any other dental licensing examination, within the previous 3 years.
DE 2.04(1)(d) (d) The applicant has been engaged in the active practice of dentistry, as defined in s. DE 1.02 (2), in one or more jurisdictions in which the applicant has a current license in good standing, for at least 48 of the 60 months preceding the application for licensure in Wisconsin.
DE 2.04(1)(e) (e) The applicant has successfully completed a clinical and laboratory demonstration licensing examination on a human subject which, in the board's judgment, is substantially equivalent to the clinical and laboratory demonstration examination administered by the central regional dental testing service, or, alternatively, has successfully completed a board specialty certification examination in a dental specialty recognized by the American Dental Association.
DE 2.04(1)(f) (f) The applicant has successfully completed a jurisprudence examination on the provisions of Wisconsin statutes and administrative rules relating to dentistry and dental hygiene.
DE 2.04(1)(g) (g) The applicant possesses a current certificate of proficiency in cardiopulmonary resuscitation from a course provider approved by the Wisconsin department of health services.
DE 2.04(1)(h) (h) The applicant has disclosed all discipline which has ever been taken against the applicant in any jurisdiction shown in reports from the national practitioner data bank and the American Association of Dental Boards.
DE 2.04(1)(i) (i) The applicant has presented satisfactory responses during any personal interview with the board which may be required to resolve conflicts between the licensing standards and the applicant's application.
DE 2.04(2) (2) The board may grant a license as a dental hygienist to an applicant who holds a license issued by the proper authorities of any other jurisdiction of the United States or Canada upon payment of the fee authorized by s. 440.05 (2), Stats., and submission of evidence satisfactory to the board that all of the following conditions are met:
DE 2.04(2)(a) (a) The applicant has graduated from a school of dental hygiene accredited by the Commission on Dental Accreditation of the American Dental Association.
DE 2.04(2)(b) (b) The applicant submits a license from each jurisdiction in which the applicant is or has ever been licensed stating that no disciplinary action is pending against the applicant or the license, and detailing all discipline, if any, which has ever been imposed against the applicant or the license.
DE 2.04(2)(c) (c) The applicant has not failed the central regional dental testing service clinical and laboratory demonstration examination, or any other dental hygiene licensing examination, within the previous 3 years.
DE 2.04(2)(d) (d) The applicant has successfully completed a clinical and laboratory demonstration examination on a human subject which, in the board's judgment, is substantially equivalent to the clinical and laboratory demonstration examination administered by the central regional dental testing service.
DE 2.04(2)(e) (e) The applicant has successfully completed a jurisprudence examination on the provisions of Wisconsin statutes and administrative rules relating to dentistry and dental hygiene.
DE 2.04(2)(f) (f) The applicant has been engaged in the active practice of dental hygiene, as defined in s. DE 1.02 (1), in a jurisdiction in which the applicant has a current license in good standing.
DE 2.04(2)(g) (g) The applicant possesses a current certificate of proficiency in cardiopulmonary resuscitation from a course provider approved by the Wisconsin department of health services.
DE 2.04(2)(h) (h) The applicant has disclosed all discipline which has ever been taken against the applicant in any jurisdiction shown in reports from the national practitioner data bank and the American Association of Dental Boards.
DE 2.04(2)(i) (i) The applicant has presented satisfactory responses during any personal interview with the board which may be required to resolve conflicts between the licensing standards and the applicant's application.
DE 2.04 History History: Cr. Register, February, 1982, No. 314, eff. 3-1-82; renum. (1) (c) and (d), (2) (c) and (d) to be (1) (d) and (f), (2) (d) and (e) and am. (1) (f), (2) (d) and (e), am. (1) (e), cr. (1) (c) and (2) (c), Register, August, 1987, No. 380, 9-1-87; am. (1) and (2), cr. (1) (g) to (i) and (2) (f) to (i), Register, August, 1991, No. 428, eff. 9-1-91; emerg. r. and recr. (1) (ed), eff. 3-18-97; am. (1) (intro.), (c) (e), (2) (intro.), (c) and (d), Register, April, 1999, No. 520, eff. 5-1-99; CR 09-007: am. (1) (a) Register October 2009 No. 646, eff. 11-1-09; CR 11-034: am. (1) (e) Register July 2012 No. 679, eff. 8-1-12; CR 11-035: am. (1) (g), (h), (2) (a), (g), (h) Register July 2012 No. 679, eff. 8-1-12.
DE 2.05 DE 2.05 Examination passing score. The score required to pass an examination shall be based on the board's determination of the level of examination performance required for minimum acceptable competence in the profession. The board shall make the determination after consultation with subject matter experts who have reviewed a representative sample of the examination questions and available candidate performance statistics, and shall set the passing score for the examination at that point which represents minimum acceptable competence in the profession.
DE 2.05 History History: Cr. Register, April, 1999, No. 520, eff. 5-1-99.
DE 2.06 DE 2.06 Unauthorized assistance. An applicant may not give or receive unauthorized assistance during the examination. The action taken by the board when unauthorized assistance occurs shall be related to the seriousness of the offense. These actions may include withholding the score of the applicant, entering a failing grade for the applicant, and suspending the ability of the applicant to sit for the next scheduled examination after the examination in which the unauthorized assistance occurred.
DE 2.06 History History: Cr. Register, April, 1999, No. 520, eff. 5-1-99.
DE 2.07 DE 2.07 Examination review.
DE 2.07(1)(1) An applicant who fails an examination administered by the board may request a review of that examination by filing a written request to the board within 30 days after the date on which the examination results were mailed to the applicant.
DE 2.07(2) (2) An examination review shall be conducted under the following conditions:
DE 2.07(2)(a) (a) The time for review shall be limited to one hour.
DE 2.07(2)(b) (b) The examination shall be reviewed only by the applicant and in the presence of a proctor.
DE 2.07(2)(c) (c) The proctor may not respond to inquiries by the applicant regarding allegations of examination error.
DE 2.07(2)(d) (d) Any comments or claims of error regarding specific questions or procedures in the examination may be placed in writing by the applicant on the form provided for this purpose. The request shall be reviewed by the board in consultation with a subject matter expert. The applicant shall be notified in writing of the board's decision.
DE 2.07(2)(e) (e) An applicant shall be permitted only one review of the failed examination each time it is taken and failed.
DE 2.07 Note Note: The board office is located at 1400 East Washington Avenue, P.O. Box 8935, Madison, Wisconsin 53708.
DE 2.07 History History: Cr. Register, April, 1999, No. 520, eff. 5-1-99.
DE 2.08 DE 2.08 Claim of examination error.
DE 2.08(1) (1) An applicant wishing to claim an error on an examination administered by the board must file a written request for board review in the board office within 30 days after the date the examination was reviewed. The request shall include all of the following:
DE 2.08(1)(a) (a) The applicant's name and address.
DE 2.08(1)(b) (b) The type of license applied for.
DE 2.08(1)(c) (c) A description of the perceived error, including reference text citations or other supporting evidence for the applicant's claim.
DE 2.08(2) (2) The request shall be reviewed by the board in consultation with a subject matter expert. The applicant shall be notified in writing of the board's decision.
DE 2.08 Note Note: The board office is located at 1400 East Washington Avenue, P.O. Box 8935, Madison, Wisconsin 53708.
DE 2.08 History History: Cr. Register, April, 1999, No. 520, eff. 5-1-99.
DE 2.09 DE 2.09 Failure and reexamination. An applicant who fails to achieve a passing grade on the board-approved examination in clinical and laboratory demonstrations may apply for reexamination on forms provided by the board and shall pay the appropriate fee for each reexamination as required in s. 440.05, Stats. If the applicant fails to achieve a passing grade on any part of the second reexamination, the applicant may not be admitted to any further examination until the applicant reapplies for licensure and presents evidence satisfactory to the board of further professional training or education as the board may prescribe following its evaluation of the applicant's specific case.
DE 2.09 History History: Cr. Register, June, 2001, No. 546, eff. 7-1-01.
Loading...
Loading...
The Wisconsin Administrative Code on this web site is updated on the 1st day of each month, current as of that date. See also Are the Codes on this Website Official?