Extension Through:   September 26, 2003
2.   Rules adopted revising ch. HFS 124, relating to critical access hospitals.
Finding of emergency
The Department of Health and Family Services finds that an emergency exists and that the rules are necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety or welfare. The facts constituting the emergency are as follows:
The federal Rural Hospital Flexibility Program promotes the continued viability of rural hospitals by allowing qualifying hospitals to receive cost-based reimbursement for their services if the hospital qualifies for and is approved to convert to what is known as a Critical Access Hospital (CAH). In Wisconsin, subchapter VI of ch. HFS 124 governs the Department's designation and regulation of CAHs. Designation as a CAH and receipt of cost-based reimbursement promotes the hospital's continued viability. To date, 25 hospitals in Wisconsin have transitioned to CAH status, thereby ensuring continued acute care access for many rural residents.
The Department recently learned that the tenuous financial condition of St. Mary's Hospital in Superior jeopardizes its continued operation and places it in imminent danger of closing unless the hospital can be designated as a CAH and receive cost-based reimbursement. The closure of St. Mary's would reduce Douglas County residents' accessibility to acute care. Moreover, the loss of the facility would have a significant detrimental effect on the county because St. Mary's annual payroll is between $7-8 million and it employs the equivalent of about 160 persons full-time.
Federal regulations permit a hospital in an urban area such as Superior to be reclassified as a critical access hospital if the hospital is located in an area designated as rural under state law or regulation. The Department has determined that the current provisions in ch. HFS 124 preclude St. Mary's from being reclassified as a rural hospital and designated as a necessary provider of health services to area residents. However, St. Mary's Hospital meets “necessary provider" status in the Wisconsin Rural Health Plan based on economic, demographic and health care delivery in its service area. Therefore, through this rulemaking order, the Department is modifying provisions in subchapter VI of ch. HFS 124 to permit St. Mary's Hospital to be classified as a rural hospital and begin the approval process for designation as a Critical Access Hospital.
Publication Date:   March 21, 2003
Effective Date:   March 21, 2003
Expiration Date:   August 18, 2003
Hearing Date:   June 20, 2003
Extension Through:   September 30, 2003
3. Rules adopted revising ch. HFS 119, relating to operation of the health insurance risk-sharing plan.
Exemption from finding of emergency
Section 149.143 (4), Stats., permits the Department to promulgate rules required under s. 149.143 (2) and (3), Stats., by using emergency rulemaking procedures, except that the Department is specifically exempted from the requirement under s. 227.24 (1) and (3), Stats., that it make a finding of emergency.
The State of Wisconsin in 1981 established a Health Insurance Risk-Sharing Plan (HIRSP) for the purpose of making health insurance coverage available to medically uninsured residents of the state. HIRSP offers different types of medical care coverage plans for residents. According to state law, HIRSP policyholder premium rates must fund sixty percent of plan costs. The remaining funding for HIRSP is to be provided by insurer assessments and adjustments to provider payment rates, in co-equal twenty percent amounts.
One type of medical coverage provided by HIRSP is the Major Medical Plan. This type of coverage is called Plan 1. Eighty-nine percent of the 16,445 HIRSP policies in effect in March 2003, were of the Plan 1 type. Plan 1 has Option A ($1,000 deductible) or Option B ($2,500 deductible). The rates for Plan 1 contained in this rulemaking order increase an average of 10.6% for policyholders not receiving a premium reduction. The average rate increase for policyholders receiving a premium reduction is 18.5%. Rate increases for individual policyholders within Plan 1 range from 5.4% to 20.9%, depending on a policyholder's age, gender, household income, deductible and zone of residence within Wisconsin. Plan 1 rate increases reflect general and industry-wide premium increases and take into account the increase in costs associated with Plan 1 claims.
A second type of medical coverage provided by HIRSP is for persons eligible for Medicare. This type of coverage is called Plan 2. Plan 2 has a $500 deductible. Eleven percent of the 16,445 HIRSP policies in effect in March 2003, were of the Plan 2 type. The rate increases for Plan 2 contained in this rulemaking order increase an average of 15.6% for policyholders not receiving a premium reduction. The average rate increase for policyholders receiving a premium reduction is 23.8%. Rate increases for individual policyholders within Plan 2 range from 9.9% to 26.5%, depending on a policyholder's age, gender, household income and zone of residence within Wisconsin. Plan 2 rate increases reflect general and industry-wide cost increases and take into account the increase in costs associated with Plan 2 claims. Plan 2 premiums are also set in accordance with the authority and requirements set out in s. 149.14 (5m), Stats.
The Department through this order amends ch. HFS 119 in order to update HIRSP premium rates in accordance with the authority and requirements set out in s. 149.143 (2) (a), Stats. The Department is required to set premium rates by rule. HIRSP premium rates must be calculated in accordance with generally accepted actuarial principles.
The Department through this order is also increasing total HIRSP insurer assessments and reducing provider payment rates, in accordance with the authority and requirements set out in s. 149.143 (2) (a) 3. and 4., Stats. With the approval of the HIRSP Board of Governors and as required by statute, the Department reconciled total costs for the HIRSP program for calendar year 2002. The Board of Governors approved a methodology that reconciles the most recent calendar year actual HIRSP program costs, policyholder premiums, insurance assessments and health care provider contributions collected with the statutorily required funding formula.
By statute, the adjustments for the calendar year are to be applied to the next plan year budget beginning July 1, 2003. The total annual contribution to the HIRSP budget provided by an assessment on insurers is $35,444,109. The total annual contribution to the HIRSP budget provided by an adjustment to the provider payment rates is $39,170,353. On April 9, 2003, the HIRSP Board of Governors approved the calendar year 2002 reconciliation process. On May 19, 2003 the Board approved the HIRSP budget for the plan year July 1, 2003 through June 30, 2004.
The department's authority to amend these rules is found in s. 149.143 (2) (a) 2., 3., 4., and (3), Stats., and s. 227.11 (2) Stats. The rule interprets ss. 149.142, 149.143, 149.146, and 149.165, Stats.
Publication Date:   June 24, 2003
Effective Date:   July 1, 2003
Expiration Date:   November 28, 2003
Hearing Date:   July 15, 2003
4.   Rules were adopted revising ch. HFS 144, relating to immunization of students.
Finding of emergency
The Department of Health and Family Services finds that an emergency exists and that the rules are necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety or welfare. The facts constituting the emergency are as follows:
The Department has a rulemaking order (CR03-033) containing a variety of relatively minor changes to over a dozen chapters of administrative rules administered by the Department. The Department had anticipated that CR03-033 would be in effect on or before September 1, 2003. One of the proposed changes in CR03-033 is a provision that changes school immunization standards. Clearinghouse Rule 03-033 has been delayed for reasons unrelated to the provisions in this order. Consequently, the identical provisions in CR03-033 will not be in effect on September 1, 2003. For reasons stated subsequently in this analysis, unless these changes to the minimum immunization requirements in chapter HFS 144, Immunization of Students, are in effect September 1, 2003, needless confusion and unintended effects will result.
In 2002, the Department's Wisconsin Immunization Program requested minor language changes to chapter HFS 144 as part of a planned “omnibus" rulemaking order containing a variety of proposed relatively minor changes. The HFS 144 proposed rule changes affect time sensitive vaccine requirements and were made so the Department's immunization requirements adhere to new vaccine recommendations made by the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP.) For example, the current requirement for Measles-Mumps-Rubella vaccine (MMR) is two doses with the first dose received on or after the first birthday. New ACIP recommendations allow a 4-day grace period so children receiving doses four days before their first birthday would be compliant. The current requirements in chapter HFS 144 do not accept as valid a dose of MMR that was given even one day prior to the first birthday. Similar time sensitive changes impact the vaccine requirement for a dose of DTaP vaccine after the fourth birthday and a dose of Hib vaccine after the first birthday.
These changes need to be in place before the start of the new 2003-04 school year. Although the changes are minor in nature, they have a significant effect on the law's enforcement at the day care and school level. Again, using MMR as an example, without the change, the school will count the child that received the MMR one day before the first birthday as non-compliant. Non-compliance can, pursuant to s. 252.04 (5), Stats., result in exclusion from school or, pursuant to s. 252.04 (6), Stats., the name of the non-complaint student being turned over to the local district attorney's office for possible court action against the parents. Therefore, the child will either need to be re-immunized or the parent will need to sign a waiver, pursuant to s. 252.04 (3), Stats. The re-immunization requirement puts the school at odds with the health care provider that is currently acting in accordance with the revised ACIP recommendations. The signing of a waiver is not a desirable option as the school reporting process to the Department counts that child as waiving all vaccine requirements and will yield misleading information as to the Immunization Law compliance level of Wisconsin day care and student populations. The Department's Immunization Program sends Immunization Law packets to the schools in mid-August. These packets include the information the schools need for enforcement of the law when school starts in September. It is imperative that the Department have the rule changes in place before the start of the school year and include the information in the school packets. Therefore, the Department is issuing this emergency order to allow school districts and health professionals to act in a timely manner.
Publication Date:   August 15, 2003
Effective Date:   August 15, 2003
Expiration Date:   January 12, 2004
Hearing Date:   September 12, 2003
Insurance (2)
1.   Rules adopted revising ch. Ins 17, relating to annual patients compensation fund and mediation fund fees for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2003 and relating to establishing a rate of compensation for fund peer review council members and consultants.
Finding of emergency
The commissioner of insurance (commissioner) finds that an emergency exists and that promulgation of this emergency rule is necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, safety or welfare. The facts constituting the emergency are as follows:
Actuarial and accounting data necessary to establish PCF fees is first available in January of each year. It is not possible to complete the permanent fee rule process in time for the patients compensation fund (fund) to bill health care providers in a timely manner for fees applicable to the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2003.
The commissioner expects that the permanent rule corresponding to this emergency rule, clearinghouse No. 03-039, will be filed with the secretary of state in time to take effect October 1, 2003. Because the fund fee provisions of this rule first apply on July 1, 2003, it is necessary to promulgate the rule on an emergency basis. A hearing on the permanent rule, pursuant to published notice thereof, was held on May 14, 2003.
Publication Date:   June 11, 2003
Effective Date:   July 1, 2003
Expiration Date:   November 28, 2003
2.   Rules adopted creating s. Ins 8.49, relating to Small Employer Uniform Employee Application.
Finding of emergency
The Commissioner of Insurance finds that an emergency exists and that the rule is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety, or welfare. Facts constituting the emergency are as follows:
The rule and the uniform small employer application are required by statute to be available by August 1, 2003. Due to implementation of 45 CFR 164 of HIPAA privacy provisions for covered entities, including health plans, and the commissioner's efforts to obtain clarification regarding authorization for release of personally identifiable health information provisions from the Office of Civil Rights a Division of Centers Medicare & Medicaid Services charged with enforcement of the privacy portions of HIPAA, it is not possible to complete the permanent rule process in time to meet the statutory requirement.
The commissioner intends to file the permanent rule corresponding to this emergency rule, clearinghouse No. 03-055, with the secretary of state within the next 150 days. Because the uniform application form is required to be available by August 1, 2003, it is necessary to promulgate the rule on an emergency basis. A hearing on the permanent rule was held on July 11, 2003, in accordance with s. 227.17, Wis. Stat., and the commissioner has had benefit of reviewing public comments and the clearinghouse report prior to issuing this emergency rule.
Publication Date:   August 1, 2003
Effective Date:   August 1, 2003
Expiration Date:   December 29, 2003
Natural Resources (2)
(Fish, Game, etc., Chs. NR 1-)
1.   Rules adopted revising chs. NR 16 and 19 and creating ch. NR 14, relating to captive wildlife.
Finding of emergency
2001 Wis. Act 56 was not enacted until April of 2002. It required standards for captive animals held under licenses issued under ch. 169, Stats., to be in place by January 1, 2003, the effective date of the change from licensing under ch. 29, Stats., to ch. 169, Stats. As the use of the permanent rule process would not allow these standards to be in place by January 1, 2003, the Department had no choice but to use the emergency rule procedures. Failure to have standards in place would result in the lack of humane care standards for wild animals held in captivity and the lack of pen standards necessary to prevent the interactions between captive and wild animals.
Publication Date:   December 20, 2002
Effective Date:   January 1, 2003
Expiration Date:   May 31, 2003
Hearing Date:   January 16, 2003
Extension Through:   September 27, 2003
2.   Rules were adopted revising ch. NR 10, relating to the 2003 migratory game bird season.
Finding of emergency
The emergency rule procedure, pursuant to s. 227.24, Stats., is necessary and justified in establishing rules to protect the public welfare. The federal government and state legislature have delegated to the appropriate agencies rule- making authority to control the hunting of migratory birds. The State of Wisconsin must comply with federal regulations in the establishment of migratory bird hunting seasons and conditions. Federal regulations are not made available to this state until mid-August of each year. This order is designed to bring the state hunting regulations to conformity with the federal regulations. Normal rule-making procedures will not allow the establishment of these changes by September 1. Failure to modify our rules will result in the failure to provide hunting opportunity and continuation of rules which conflict with federal regulations.
Publication Date:   August 29, 2003
Effective Date:   August 29, 2003
Expiration Date:   January 26, 2004
Workforce Development
(Civil Rights, Chs. DWD 210—)
Rules adopted repealing chs. PC 1, 2, 4, 5 and 7 and revising chs. DWD 218 and 225 and creating ch. DWD 224, relating to the transfer of personnel commission responsibilities to the equal rights division.
Finding of emergency
The Department of Workforce Development finds that an emergency exists and that a rule is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety, or welfare. A statement of facts constituting the emergency is:
2003 Wisconsin Act 33 transfers the responsibility for processing certain employment-related complaints against state respondents from the Personnel Commission (PC) to the Equal Rights Division (ERD) effective upon publication of 2003 Wisconsin Act 33. The ERD needs rules governing the procedures for processing these complaints effective immediately to ensure that service is not seriously delayed by this administrative change. The PC expects to transfer approximately 200 pending cases to ERD immediately.
2003 Wisconsin Act 33 transfers responsibility from the PC to ERD for 9 different types of employment-related complaints against state respondents. The ERD has had responsibility for processing complaints against nonstate respondents for 8 of the 9 types of complaints. This order makes minor amendments to existing rules to include state respondents and creates a new rule chapter on whistleblower protection for state employees, which is the one issue that ERD has not previously handled because the law does not apply to nonstate respondents. The newly-created whistleblower rules are similar to the existing fair employment rules.
A nonstatutory provision of 2003 Wisconsin Act 33 transfers existing PC rules to ERD. This order repeals those rules. Adopting the PC rules would result in different procedures for cases against state respondents and nonstate respondents for no logical reason. The dual system would be difficult to administer and confusing to complainants, many of whom are pro se. Even if ERD adopted the PC rules, an emergency rule would be necessary to remove confusing irrelevant and obsolete information.
This order repeals the PC rules and revises ERD rules by emergency rule to ensure that a clear, logical, and fair process is in place for handling the newly-transferred responsibilities for protecting Wisconsin's workforce from discrimination and retaliation.
Publication Date:   August 5, 2003
Effective Date:   August 5, 2003
Expiration Date:   January 2, 2004
Loading...
Loading...
Links to Admin. Code and Statutes in this Register are to current versions, which may not be the version that was referred to in the original published document.