hist20426The question was: Shall Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Amendment 5 to Assembly Bill 506 be adopted?
Motion carried.
hist20427The question was: Shall Assembly Amendment 5 to Assembly Bill 506 be adopted?
Motion carried.
hist20428The question was: Shall Assembly Bill 506 be ordered engrossed and read a third time?
Motion carried.
hist20429Representative Kramer asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 506 be given a third reading. Granted.
hist20430The question was: Assembly Bill 506 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed?
Motion carried.
hist20431Representative Kramer asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 506 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
hist20432Representative Kramer asked unanimous consent that Senate Bill 433 be withdrawn from today's calendar and taken up at this time. Granted.
hist20433Senate Bill 433
Relating to: prohibiting municipalities from providing alcohol beverages retailers with identification scanners.
hist20434The question was: Shall Senate Bill 433 be ordered to a third reading?
Motion carried.
hist20435Representative Kramer asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 433 be given a third reading. Granted.
hist20436The question was: Senate Bill 433 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in?
Motion carried.
hist20437Representative Kramer asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 433 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
Assembly Bill 535
Relating to: prohibiting municipalities from providing alcohol beverages retailers with identification scanners.
hist20438Representative Kramer asked unanimous consent that Assembly Bill 535 be laid on the table. Granted.
hist20439Assembly Bill 536
Relating to: prohibition on tracking the location of a cellular telephone by law enforcement without a warrant.
hist20440The question was: Shall Assembly Bill 536 be ordered engrossed and read a third time?
Motion carried.
hist20441Representative Kramer asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 536 be given a third reading. Granted.
hist20442The question was: Assembly Bill 536 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed?
Motion carried.
hist20443Representative Kramer asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 536 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
hist20444Representative Kramer asked unanimous consent that Assembly Bill 589 be withdrawn from today's calendar and taken up at this time. Granted.
hist20445Assembly Bill 589
Relating to: issuance by a first class city of a license for a retail food establishment and a permit for a restaurant or bed and breakfast establishment.
hist20448The question was: Shall Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 589 be adopted?
Motion carried.
hist20446The question was: Shall Assembly Bill 589 be ordered engrossed and read a third time?
Motion carried.
hist20447Representative Kramer asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 589 be given a third reading. Granted.
hist20449The question was: Assembly Bill 589 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed?
Motion carried.
hist20450Representative Kramer asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 589 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
hist20451Assembly Bill 592
Relating to: solicitation of a fee by a business or individual for a public record, granting rule-making authority, and providing a penalty.
hist20601The question was: Shall Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 592 be adopted?
Motion carried.
hist20452The question was: Shall Assembly Bill 592 be ordered engrossed and read a third time?
Motion carried.
hist20453Representative Kramer asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 592 be given a third reading. Granted.
hist20454The question was: Assembly Bill 592 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed?
Motion carried.
hist20455Representative Barca asked unanimous consent to be added as a coauthor of Assembly Bill 592. Granted.
hist20456Representative Kramer asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 592 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
hist20459Assembly Bill 598
Relating to: changing the method for charging interest that may be charged on special assessments and changing the interest rate paid on claims for certain unlawfully assessed property taxes and creating an exception for local levy limits.
hist20457Representative Nygren asked unanimous consent that Assembly Bill 598 be referred to the joint committee on Finance. Granted.
hist20458 Representative Nygren asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 598 be withdrawn from the joint committee on Finance and taken up at this time. Granted.
hist20298Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 598 offered by Representative Steineke.
hist20460The question was: Shall Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 598 be adopted?
Motion carried.
hist20461The question was: Shall Assembly Bill 598 be ordered engrossed and read a third time?
Motion carried.
hist20462Representative Kramer asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 598 be given a third reading. Granted.
hist20463The question was: Assembly Bill 598 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed?
The roll was taken.
The result follows:
Ayes - Representatives August, Ballweg, Barca, Barnes, Berceau, Bernier, Bewley, Bies, Billings, Born, Brooks, Clark, Craig, Danou, Doyle, Endsley, Genrich, Goyke, Hebl, Hesselbein, Hintz, Hulsey, Hutton, Jacque, Jagler, Johnson, Jorgensen, Kahl, Kapenga, Kaufert, Kerkman, Kessler, Kestell, Kleefisch, Klenke, Knodl, Knudson, Kolste, Kooyenga, Kramer, Krug, Kuglitsch, Kulp, T. Larson, LeMahieu, Loudenbeck, Marklein, Mason, Milroy, Murphy, Mursau, Murtha, Nass, Nerison, Neylon, Nygren, Ohnstad, A. Ott, J. Ott, Pasch, Petersen, Petryk, Pope, Pridemore, Richards, Riemer, Ringhand, Ripp, Rodriguez, Sanfelippo, Sargent, Schraa, Severson, Shankland, Sinicki, Skowronski, Smith, Spiros, Steineke, Strachota, Stroebel, Swearingen, Tauchen, C. Taylor, Thiesfeldt, Tittl, Tranel, Vruwink, Wachs, Weatherston, Weininger, Williams, Wright, Young, Zamarripa, Zepnick and Speaker Vos - 97.
Noes - None.
Absent or not voting - Representatives Bernard Schaber and Czaja - 2.
Motion carried.
hist20464Representative Kramer asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 598 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
hist20465Representative Kramer asked unanimous consent that Senate Bill 453 be withdrawn from today's calendar and taken up at this time. Granted.
hist20466Senate Bill 453
Relating to: the furnishing of intoxicating liquor taste samples at certain retailer trade association events.
hist20467The question was: Shall Senate Bill 453 be ordered to a third reading?
Motion carried.
hist20468Representative Kramer asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 453 be given a third reading. Granted.
hist20469The question was: Senate Bill 453 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in?
Motion carried.
hist20470Representative Kramer asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 453 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
Assembly Bill 600
Relating to: the furnishing of intoxicating liquor taste samples at certain retailer trade association events.
hist20471Representative Kramer asked unanimous consent that Assembly Bill 600 be laid on the table. Granted.
hist20472Representative Kramer asked unanimous consent that Senate Bill 452 be withdrawn from today's calendar and taken up at this time. Granted.
hist20473Senate Bill 452
Relating to: creating an exception to the prohibition against underage persons entering or being on premises operating under a retail alcohol beverage license.
hist20474The question was: Shall Senate Bill 452 be ordered to a third reading?
Motion carried.
hist20475Representative Kramer asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 452 be given a third reading. Granted.
hist20476The question was: Senate Bill 452 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in?
Loading...
Loading...