LRB-2111/1
EVM&MES:jld:jf
2009 - 2010 LEGISLATURE
March 30, 2009 - Introduced by Representatives Mason, Turner, Richards,
Zepnick, Molepske Jr.
and Barca, cosponsored by Senator Plale. Referred to
Committee on Urban and Local Affairs.
AB174,1,4 1An Act to amend 66.1106 (1) (i), 66.1106 (7) (a) and 66.1106 (11) (a); and to
2create
66.1106 (2) (c) and 66.1106 (7) (e) of the statutes; relating to:
3authorizing sharing of tax increments by certain environmental remediation
4tax incremental districts.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, the environmental remediation tax incremental financing
program permits a city, village, town, or county (political subdivision) to recoup the
costs of remediating contaminated property from property taxes that are levied on
the remediated property. The mechanism for financing remediation costs is very
similar to the mechanism for financing project costs under the tax incremental
financing program.
Initially, the governing body of a political subdivision adopts a resolution
creating an environmental remediation tax incremental district (ERTID) with
particular boundaries. This resolution is then reviewed by a joint review board made
up of representatives of the overlying taxing jurisdictions. If the joint review board
approves the ERTID, a political subdivision that has incurred eligible costs to
remediate environmental pollution on a parcel of property may apply to the
Department of Revenue (DOR) to certify the environmental remediation tax
incremental base of the parcel. DOR is required to certify the environmental
remediation tax incremental base if the political subdivision submits to DOR all of
the following: 1) a statement that the political subdivision has incurred some eligible
costs, together with a detailed proposed remedial action plan approved by the

Department of Natural Resources (DNR) that contains cost estimates for anticipated
eligible costs, a schedule for the design and implementation that is needed to
complete the remediation, and certification from DNR that it has approved the site
investigation report that relates to the parcel; 2) a statement that all taxing
jurisdictions with authority to levy general property taxes on the parcel of property
have been notified that the political subdivision intends to recover its environmental
remediation costs by using an environmental remediation tax increment; and 3) a
statement that the political subdivision has attempted to recover its environmental
remediation costs from the person who is responsible for the environmental pollution
that is being remediated. Thereafter, the political subdivision that created the
ERTID may use positive environmental remediation tax increments to pay eligible
costs of remediating environmental pollution in the ERTID.
Currently, the maximum life of an ERTID is 23 years and no expenditure for
an eligible cost may be made by a political subdivision later than 15 years after the
environmental remediation tax incremental base is certified by DOR. An ERTID
may also terminate when a political subdivision has received sufficient
environmental remediation tax increments to cover all of the eligible costs.
This bill allows the governing body of a political subdivision to adopt a
resolution requesting that DOR allocate environmental remediation tax increments
from an ERTID that has recovered all eligible costs to another ERTID created by the
same governing body. Upon receipt of a copy of this resolution, DOR would continue
to allocate environmental remediation tax increments from the donor ERTID after
all of the eligible costs for that ERTID have been recovered. These increments would
be applied to another ERTID created in the same political subdivision. Increments
from the donor ERTID continue to be generated until the earlier of: 1) 23 years after
the creation of the donor ERTID; or 2) the recovery of all eligible costs for the
recipient ERTID.
For further information see the state and local fiscal estimate, which will be
printed as an appendix to this bill.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do
enact as follows:
AB174, s. 1 1Section 1. 66.1106 (1) (i) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB174,2,62 66.1106 (1) (i) "Period of certification" means a period of not more than 23 years
3beginning after the department certifies the environmental remediation tax
4incremental base under sub. (4) or, a period before all eligible costs have been paid,
5or a period before all eligible costs of a recipient district designated under sub. (2) (c)
6have been paid,
whichever occurs first.
AB174, s. 2
1Section 2. 66.1106 (2) (c) of the statutes is created to read:
AB174,3,112 66.1106 (2) (c) Notwithstanding par. (a) or (b), or sub. (7) (d) 1. or (11) (a), if the
3governing body of a political subdivision determines that all eligible costs of an
4environmental remediation tax incremental district that it created will be paid
5before the date specified in sub. (11) (b), the governing body of that political
6subdivision may adopt a resolution requesting that the department allocate positive
7environmental remediation tax increments generated by that donor environmental
8remediation tax incremental district to pay the eligible costs of another
9environmental remediation tax incremental district created by that governing body.
10A resolution under this paragraph must be adopted before the expiration of the
11period of certification.
AB174, s. 3 12Section 3. 66.1106 (7) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB174,3,1813 66.1106 (7) (a) Subject to pars. (b), (c) and, (d), and (e), the department shall
14annually authorize the positive environmental remediation tax increment with
15respect to a parcel or contiguous parcels of property during the period of certification
16to the political subdivision that incurred the costs to remediate environmental
17pollution on the property, except that an authorization granted under this paragraph
18does not apply after the department receives the notice described under sub. (10) (b).
AB174, s. 4 19Section 4. 66.1106 (7) (e) of the statutes is created to read:
AB174,4,220 66.1106 (7) (e) Notwithstanding par. (d), if the governing body of a political
21subdivision adopts a resolution described in sub. (2) (c), it shall provide a copy of the
22resolution to the department. The department shall authorize a positive
23environmental remediation tax increment generated by a donor district, as described
24in sub. (2) (c), to the political subdivision that incurred eligible costs to remediate

1environmental pollution in another district within that political subdivision, as
2described in sub. (2) (c), until the earlier of the following occurs:
AB174,4,53 1. The political subdivision has received aggregate environmental remediation
4tax increments with respect to the recipient district in an amount equal to the
5aggregate of all of the eligible costs for that district.
AB174,4,66 2. The donor district terminates under sub. (11) (b).
AB174, s. 5 7Section 5. 66.1106 (11) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB174,4,108 66.1106 (11) (a) The Except as provided in sub. (2) (c), the political subdivision
9has received aggregate environmental remediation tax increments with respect to
10the district in an amount equal to the aggregate of all eligible costs.
AB174,4,1111 (End)
Loading...
Loading...