May 17, 2017 - Introduced by Senators Harsdorf, Craig, Kapenga and Stroebel,
cosponsored by Representatives Kremer, Vos, Murphy, Allen, Brandtjen, R.
Brooks
, Duchow, Horlacher, Hutton, Katsma, Kleefisch, Knodl,
Kooyenga, Kuglitsch, Kulp, Mursau, Petersen, Quinn, Rohrkaste,
Sanfelippo, Skowronski, Spiros, Tauchen, Thiesfeldt, Tittl, Tusler,
Vorpagel and Wichgers. Referred to Committee on Universities and
Technical Colleges.
SB250,1,4 1An Act to amend 36.35 (1); and to create 36.02 and 227.01 (13) (Lo) of the
2statutes; relating to: free expression within the University of Wisconsin
3System, providing an exemption from rule-making procedures, and granting
4rule-making authority.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill requires the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
to adopt a policy on free expression that applies at the four-year and two-year
institutions of the system and supersedes and nullifies any prior Board of Regents
or institution policies or rules restricting free expression. The bill allows the Board
of Regents to adopt the policy without promulgating rules and requires the policy to
be adopted no later than 120 days after the bill's effective date. The policy must
contain statements regarding the following: 1) that the primary function of an
institution is the discovery, improvement, transmission, and dissemination of
knowledge; 2) that it is not the proper role of an institution to shield individuals from
speech protected by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution; 3) that students
and faculty have the freedom to discuss any problem as permitted by the First
Amendment and within specified limits; 4) that any person lawfully present on
campus may protest or demonstrate, but that protests and demonstrations that
interfere with the expressive rights of others are subject to sanction; 5) that
campuses are open to invited speakers; 6) that public areas are public forums and
open on the same terms to any speaker; and 7) that institutions must remain neutral
on public policy controversies.

The policy must include a range of disciplinary sanctions for anyone under an
institution's jurisdiction who engages in violent, abusive, indecent, profane,
boisterous, obscene, unreasonably loud, or other disorderly conduct that interferes
with the free expression of others. In addition, the policy must provide that in
disciplinary cases involving expressive conduct, students are entitled to a
disciplinary hearing under published procedures that include specified rights. Also,
the second time that a student is found responsible for interfering with the
expressive rights of others, the policy must require the student to be suspended for
a minimum of one semester or expelled.
The bill also provides that institutions may restrict student expression only for
expressive activity that is not protected by the First Amendment, including state or
federal law violations, defamation, specified types of harassment and threats,
certain invasions of privacy or confidentiality, and violations of reasonable time,
place, or manner restrictions on expressive activities.
The bill also requires the Board of Regents to appoint a council on free
expression to make annual reports to the Board of Regents, legislature, and governor
that describe institutional neutrality, free expression barriers and disruptions, and
administrative handling and discipline relating to those barriers and disruptions.
The council must consist of 13 members who represent each four-year university and
the chairpersons of the assembly and senate standing committees with jurisdiction
over universities.
The bill also does the following:
1. Allows a person whose expressive rights are violated by a violation of the
bill's requirements to bring an action to enjoin a violation.
2. Sets forth legislative findings regarding free expression at the institutions
of the UW system.
3. Requires institutions to describe free expression policies and rules in
freshman orientation programs.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do
enact as follows:
SB250,1 1Section 1. 36.02 of the statutes is created to read:
SB250,2,3 236.02 Campus Free Speech Act. (1) Legislative findings. The legislature
3finds all of the following:
SB250,2,54 (a) Article I, section 3, of the Wisconsin Constitution recognizes the right to
5speak freely and prohibits laws abridging the liberty of speech.
SB250,2,76 (b) The system has historically embraced a commitment to freedom of
7expression in policy.
SB250,3,3
1(c) In recent years, institutions have abdicated their responsibility to uphold
2free speech principles and these failures make it appropriate for the system to restate
3and confirm its commitment in this regard.
SB250,3,124 (d) In 1974, the Committee on Free Expression at Yale issued a statement
5known as the Woodward Report that stands as a classic defense of free expression
6on campuses; in 2015, the Committee on Freedom of Expression at the University
7of Chicago issued a similar and widely respected report; and in 1967, the Kalven
8Committee Report of the University of Chicago articulated the principle of
9institutional neutrality regarding political and social issues and the essential role of
10such neutrality in protecting freedom of thought and expression at universities. The
11principles affirmed by these 3 highly regarded reports are inspiring articulations of
12the critical importance of free expression in higher education.
SB250,3,1513 (e) The legislature views freedom of expression as being of critical importance
14and requires that each institution ensure free, robust, and uninhibited debate and
15deliberation by students whether on or off campus.
SB250,3,1716 (f) The legislature has determined that it is a matter of statewide concern that
17all institutions officially recognize freedom of speech as a fundamental right.
SB250,3,18 18(2) Short title. This section shall be known as the “Campus Free Speech Act.”
SB250,3,19 19(3) Definitions. In this section:
SB250,3,2020 (a) “Institution” means a college campus or university.
SB250,4,221 (b) “Peer-on-peer harassment” means conduct directed by one student
22towards another individual student, on the basis of that other student's race, color,
23creed, religion, political views, sex, national origin, disability, ancestry, age, sexual
24orientation, gender identity, pregnancy, marital status, parental status, or military
25status, that is so severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive that it effectively

1deprives the victim of access to the educational opportunities or benefits provided by
2an institution.
SB250,4,73 (c) “Quid pro quo sexual harassment” means explicitly or implicitly
4conditioning a student's participation in an education program or activity or basing
5an educational decision on the student's submission to unwelcome sexual advances,
6requests for sexual favors, or other verbal, nonverbal, or physical conduct of a sexual
7nature.
SB250,4,138 (d) “True threat” means a statement that a speaker would reasonably foresee
9that a listener would reasonably interpret as a serious expression of a purpose to
10inflict harm, as distinguished from hyperbole, jest, innocuous talk, expressions of
11political views, or other speech that is similarly protected under the First
12Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, regardless of whether the speaker has the
13ability to carry out the threat.
SB250,4,17 14(4) Free expression policy. (a) Statements. No later than 120 days after the
15effective date of this paragraph .... [LRB inserts date], the Board of Regents shall
16develop and adopt a policy on free expression that contains statements of at least all
17the following:
SB250,4,2218 1. That the primary function of an institution is the discovery, improvement,
19transmission, and dissemination of knowledge by means of research, teaching,
20discussion, and debate. This statement shall provide that, to fulfill this function, an
21institution must strive to ensure the fullest degree of intellectual freedom and free
22expression.
SB250,4,2523 2. That it is not the proper role of an institution to shield individuals from
24speech protected by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, including ideas
25and opinions they find unwelcome, disagreeable, or even deeply offensive.
SB250,5,10
13. That students and faculty have the freedom to discuss any problem that
2presents itself, as the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution permits and within
3the limits of reasonable viewpoint-neutral and content-neutral restrictions on time,
4place, and manner of expression that are consistent with this section and that are
5necessary to achieve a significant institutional interest, provided that these
6restrictions are clear, published, and provide ample alternative means of expression.
7Students and faculty shall be permitted to assemble and engage in spontaneous
8expressive activity as long as such activity is not unlawful and does not materially
9and substantially disrupt the functioning of an institution, subject to the
10requirements of this section.
SB250,5,1511 4. That any person lawfully present on campus may protest or demonstrate
12there. This statement shall make clear that protests and demonstrations that
13interfere with the rights of others to engage in or listen to expressive activity shall
14not be permitted and shall be subject to sanction. This statement shall not prohibit
15professors or other instructors from maintaining order in the classroom.
SB250,5,1716 5. That the campuses of the institution are open to any speaker whom students,
17student groups, or members of the faculty have invited.
SB250,5,1918 6. That the public areas of institutions are public forums and open on the same
19terms to any speaker.
SB250,5,2320 7. That each institution shall strive to remain neutral, as an institution, on the
21public policy controversies of the day, and may not take action, as an institution, on
22the public policy controversies of the day in such a way as to require students or
23faculty to publicly express a given view of social policy.
SB250,5,2524 (b) Discipline. The policy required under par. (a) shall satisfy all of the
25following:
SB250,6,4
11. Include a range of disciplinary sanctions for anyone under the jurisdiction
2of the institution who engages in violent, abusive, indecent, profane, boisterous,
3obscene, unreasonably loud, or other disorderly conduct that interferes with the free
4expression of others.
SB250,6,75 2. Provide that in all disciplinary cases involving expressive conduct, students
6are entitled to a disciplinary hearing under published procedures, including, at least
7all of the following:
SB250,6,88 a. The right to receive advanced written notice of the charges.
SB250,6,99 b. The right to review the evidence in support of the charges.
SB250,6,1010 c. The right to confront witnesses against them.
SB250,6,1111 d. The right to present a defense.
SB250,6,1212 e. The right to call witnesses.
SB250,6,1313 f. A decision by an impartial arbiter or panel.
SB250,6,1414 g. The right of appeal.
SB250,6,1615 h. The right to active assistance of counsel, if suspension for longer than 9 days
16or expulsion are potential penalties.
SB250,6,1917 3. Require suspension for a minimum of one semester or expulsion of any
18student who has twice been found responsible for interfering with the expressive
19rights of others.
SB250,6,2520 (c) Inconsistent policies and rules. The policy required under par. (a)
21supersedes and nullifies any prior provisions in the policies and rules of the Board
22of Regents or an institution that restrict speech on campus and are, therefore,
23inconsistent with the policy. The Board of Regents and each institution shall remove
24or revise any such provisions in its policies and rules to ensure compatibility with the
25the policy required under par. (a).
SB250,7,6
1(5) Council on free expression. (a) The Board of Regents shall create a single
2council on free expression consisting of no less than 15 members. Thirteen of the
3members shall each represent one of the universities of the system and 2 of the
4members shall be the chairpersons of the assembly and senate standing committees
5having jurisdiction over universities as determined by the speaker of the assembly
6and the president of the senate.
SB250,7,107 (b) Annually no later than September 1, the council shall submit to the Board
8of Regents, the governor, and the chief clerk of each house of the legislature, for
9distribution to the appropriate standing committees under s. 13.172 (3), a report that
10includes all of the following:
SB250,7,1211 1. A description of any barriers to or disruptions of free expression within
12institutions.
SB250,7,1413 2. A description of the administrative handling and discipline relating to
14disruptions or barriers described in subd. 1.
SB250,7,1715 3. A description of substantial difficulties, controversies, or successes in
16maintaining a posture of administrative and institutional neutrality with regard to
17political or social issues.
SB250,7,1918 4. Any assessments, criticisms, commendations, or recommendations the
19council sees fit to include in the report.
SB250,7,2120 (c) The Board of Regents shall make the report required under par. (b) available
21to the public on the system's Internet site.
SB250,7,24 22(6) Freshman orientation. Each institution shall include in freshman
23orientation programs a section describing to all students the policies and rules
24regarding free expression consistent with this section.
SB250,8,2
1(7) Rules. The Board of Regents may promulgate rules to further the purposes
2of the policy required under sub. (4) (a).
SB250,8,4 3(8) Construction. Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent
4institutions from regulating student speech or activity that is prohibited by law.
SB250,8,8 5(9) Restriction of student expression. Except as further limited by this
6section, institutions may restrict student expression only for expressive activity not
7protected by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, including any of the
8following:
SB250,8,99 (a) Violations of state or federal law.
SB250,8,1010 (b) Expression that a court has deemed unprotected defamation.
SB250,8,1111 (c) Peer-on-peer harassment.
SB250,8,1212 (d) Quid pro quo sexual harassment.
SB250,8,1313 (e) True threats.
SB250,8,1514 (f) An unjustifiable invasion of privacy or confidentiality not involving a matter
15of public concern.
SB250,8,1616 (g) An action that unlawfully disrupts the function of an institution.
SB250,8,1817 (h) A violation of a reasonable time, place, and manner restriction on expressive
18activities that is consistent with sub. (4) (a) 3.
SB250,8,21 19(10) Enforcement. (a) A person whose expressive rights are violated by a
20violation of this section or the policy adopted under sub. (4) (a) may bring an action
21to enjoin the violation of this section or the policy.
SB250,9,222 (b) In an action brought under par. (a), if the court finds that a violation of this
23subsection occurred, the court shall award injunctive relief for the violation, and,
24notwithstanding s. 814.04 (1), reasonable attorney fees and costs. The court shall

1also award the actual damages caused by the violation or $1,000, whichever is
2greater.
SB250,9,83 (c) A person specified in par. (a) 2. shall bring an action for a violation of this
4subsection within one year after the date the cause of action accrues. For the purpose
5of calculating the one-year limitation period, each day that the violation persists or
6each day that a policy in violation of this subsection remains in effect constitutes a
7new violation of this subsection and shall be considered a day that the cause of action
8has accrued.
SB250,2 9Section 2. 36.35 (1) of the statutes is amended to read:
SB250,9,1310 36.35 (1) Power to suspend; rules. The board may delegate the power to
11suspend or expel students for misconduct or other cause prescribed by the board.
12Subject to sub. (4) and s. 36.02 (4) (b), the board shall promulgate rules under ch. 227
13governing student conduct and procedures for the administration of violations.
SB250,3 14Section 3 . 227.01 (13) (Lo) of the statutes is created to read:
SB250,9,1515 227.01 (13) (Lo) Adopts the policy required under s. 36.02 (4) (a).
SB250,9,1616 (End)
Loading...
Loading...