b. When the continuing distance between the pursuing and fleeing vehicles is such that further pursuit is futile;
c. When the pursued vehicle's location is unknown;
d. When the officer's vehicle or emergency equipment malfunctions; or
e. When it is necessary to stop to render aid to an injured person or persons, and no other unit is available to do so.
SECTION 3. Create s. LES 3.03 (7) (b) to read:
LES 3.03 (7) (b) A training guide entitled “Use Emergency Vehicle Driving Techniques" shall be approved by the board for subsection (7) and shall include student performance objectives for police pursuit driving techniques.
SECTION 4. Create s. LES 3.07 (title) and (1) to read:
LES 3.07 Minimum standards for recertification training. (1) Minimum standards for recertification training for law enforcement and tribal law enforcement officers shall require that law enforcement and tribal law enforcement officers with exception of those who serve on a temporary or probationary basis shall biennially complete at least 4 hours of training the curriculum of which shall include reference to employer's guidelines provided under s. 346.03 (6) Stats. Training may also include achievement of student performance objectives from board approved training guides entitled “Use Pursuit Guidelines" and “Use Emergency Vehicle Driving Techniques" and/or review, for policy development, or applicable research and new technology and/or training to employ new technology.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Proposed rules of the Law Enforcement Standards Board do not affect small businesses.
Fiscal Estimate
Proposed rules of the Law Enforcement Standards Board establish voluntary pursuit standards. Law enforcement agencies are not required to comply with the standards or to amend their policies to conform with the standards.
The proposed rules establish a curriculum for biennial training related to vehicular pursuits. As instruction will qualify for inclusion in the annual 24-hour recertification training requirement for each law enforcement officer for which the Department of Justice reimburses expenses, it will not generate any additional training expenses.
The Department of Justice provides staff services for the Law Enforcement Standards Board under s. 165.86, Stats. The current expense of those services will neither increase nor decrease as a result of proposed administrative rules for vehicular pursuits and related training.
There is no state fiscal effect and no local government costs anticipated.
Contact Information
Dennis Hanson, Director
Training and Standards Bureau
Wisconsin Department of Justice
123 West Washington Ave.
P.O. Box 7070
Madison, WI 53707-7070
Notice of Hearings
Natural Resources
(Environmental Protection-General
Chs. NR 100-)
(Environmental Protection-Water
Supply, Chs. NR 800-)
Notice is hereby given that pursuant to ss. 227.11(2)(a), 280.11(1), 281.17(3) and (8) and 281.41(1), Stats., interpreting ss. 280.11(1), 281.17(3) and (8) and 281.41(1), Stats., the Department of Natural Resources will hold public hearings on modifications to chs. NR 108, 114, 809 and 811 and the creation of subch. III, ch. NR 809, Wis. Adm. Code, relating to safe drinking water and waterworks operator certification. U.S. EPA is now promulgating new drinking water regulations mandated by the 1996 Amendments to the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) and will continue to do so over the next several years. As the primacy agent for U.S. EPA in Wisconsin, the Department must adopt and implement regulations at least as stringent as those promulgated by U.S. EPA.
Chapters NR 108 and 811 are modified primarily to ensure conformance of definitions between all codes addressing community water systems. Other changes correct old errors, or provide greater clarify and/or flexibility in existing requirements.
Modifications to ch. NR 114 are in response to SWDA requirements that small non-municipal water systems be operated by a certified person. A new subchapter added to ch. NR 114 requires these systems to be operated by a person who completes a training course, passes a written examination and obtains 6 hours of continuing education credits every 3 years.
Modifications to ch. NR 809 include:
Consumer confidence regulation: This regulation establishes a requirement for all public community water systems to issue a water quality report annually.
Disinfectant/disinfectant by-products regulation: In addition to new and revised MCLs, this regulation establishes new monitoring for disinfectant by-products and disinfectant by-product precursors. The most significant increased monitoring will occur in systems that utilize a surface water source. Additionally, all groundwater systems that disinfect will experience some increase in monitoring under this regulation.
Interim enhanced surface water treatment regulation: This regulation affects surface water systems and systems using groundwater under the direct influence of surface water. This rule will strengthen microbial protection by establishing removal requirements for Cyptosporidium through the filtration process, reducing allowable finished water turbidity levels, requiring monitoring of individual filter performance and by establishing disinfection profiling and benchmarking provisions.
Variance and exemption regulation : This regulation creates a new affordability-based small systems variance, which may be granted by a state to a public water system serving fewer than 3,300 persons, or, with the approval of EPA's administrator, to a system serving 3,301 – 10,000 persons.
Restricted microbiological analytical methods and direct lab reporting: The first change would require all samples collected to establish compliance with the total coliform MCL be analyzed using a single method. Direct reporting would require laboratories to transmit results of compliance samples directly to the Department and the facility concurrently.Additionally for positive results, which indicate a potential public health threat, laboratories would be required to transmit the results to the Department and the facility within 24 hours of obtaining the result.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Notice is hereby further given that pursuant to s. 227.114, Stats., the proposed rule may have an impact on small businesses. The initial regulatory flexibility analysis is as follows:
a. Types of small businesses affected: Mobile home parks, condo developments and apartment complexes that have their own water supply system.
b. Descriptions of reporting and bookkeeping procedures required: Customers must be provided with an annual water quality report. Certified operators will be required to document attendance at training sessions.
c. Description of professional skills required: Skills to become a certified operator. Otherwise no new skills required.
Environmental Assessment
Notice is hereby further given that the Department has made a preliminary determination that this action does not involve significant adverse environmental effects and does not need an environmental analysis under ch. NR 150, Wis. Adm. Code. However, based on the comments received, the Department may prepare an environmental analysis before proceeding with the proposal. This environmental review documents would summarize the Department's consideration of the impacts of the proposal and reasonable alternatives.
Hearing Information
February 14, 2000 Pinery Room
Monday Public Library
at 1:00 p.m. 1001 Main Street
Stevens Point, WI
February 15, 2000 Lounge
Tuesday Winnebago Co. Courthouse
at 1:00 p.m. 415 Jackson Ave.
Oshkosh, WI
February 16, 2000 Gov. Thompson Fish Hatchery
Wednesday 951 W. Maple
at 12:00 p.m. Spooner, WI
February 17, 2000 Room G55/G59
Thursday Waukesha Co. Courthouse
at 9:00 a.m. 515 W. Moorland Blvd.
Waukesha, WI
February 18, 2000 Room 611A, GEF #2
Friday 101 S. Webster St.
at 1:00 p.m. Madison, WI
Notice is hereby further given that pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, reasonable accommodations, including the provision of information material in an alternative format, will be provided for qualified individuals with disabilities upon request. Please call Don Swailes at (608) 266-7093 with specific information on your request at least 10 days before the date of the scheduled hearing.
Written Comments
Written comments on the proposed rule may be submitted to Mr. Don Swailes, Bureau of Drinking Water and Groundwater, P.O. Box 7921, Madison, WI 53707 no later than March 10, 2000. Written comments will have the same weight and effect as oral statements presented at the hearings. A copy of the proposed rule [ DG-3-00] and fiscal estimate may be obtained from Mr. Swailes.
Fiscal Estimate
Fiscal Impacts
Cost increases accruing to the Department are a result of increased monitoring and reporting requirements under the CCR, IESWTR, and D/DBP rules, and development and implementation of the OpCert program. With new monitoring and reporting requirements on regulated facilities,- there will also be increased enforcement activities as a result of new violations and ultimately, there will be an increase in plan review and technical assistance to systems as a result of installation of new equipment to meet new standards. All initial cost increases to the Department from CCR, IFS WTR, and DIDBP rules are covered through ongoing upgrades to our automated compliance tracking system and technical assistance set aside funds from federal drinking water revolving loan grants. Development and implementation of an OpCert program will be covered by a specific OpCert set aside from the drinking water state revolving loan funds. Monitoring and reporting increases will not be felt fully until the follow on regulations to the IESWTR and DIDBP rules are promulgated. When the next rules are promulgated, increased resources will be requested through the budget process.
Cost increases to local government will result from CCR requirements, new monitoring and analytical requirements associated with the IESWTR and D/DBP rules, and for school districts only, new requirements for a certified operators. CCR requirements for municipal systems are estimated by U.S. EPA at an average annual cost of $442/year/system, but since all municipal systems have already provided the notice in 1999, addition of the CCR to State Codes will not create any additional cost. U.S. EPA has estimated the worst case average annual cost for implementation of the D/DBP rule to be about $8900/year/disinfecting system. However, for the vast majority of Wisconsin's disinfecting municipal water systems, the cost should be less than $1000/year. IESWTR costs are only incurred by Wisconsin's 20 surface water systems. These systems, as a result of federal direct implementation of the Information Collection Rule and the 1993 cryptosporidium incident in Milwaukee, have already either installed or are currently installing the equipment necessary to meet requirements of the IESWTR. Based on national cost estimates, average system cost of implementing the IESWTR is approximately $1.1 15 million/year. However, that estimate assumes systems have made no improvements in their treatment processes prior to promulgation of the rule, which is not the case in Wisconsin.
Long-Range Fiscal Implications
Over a 2 - 4 year period new rules associated with the IESWTR and the D/DBP regulation will create a need for additional Department resources. Resources would be used for both contractors and permanent staff. In addition, other new regulations unrelated to the aforementioned rules must be incorporated in State Codes, further taxing existing resources.
Notice of Proposed Rule
Revenue
Notice is hereby given that pursuant to s. 227.11 (2) Stats., and interpreting ss. 66.058 (3) and 79.10 (10), Stats., and according to the procedure set forth in s. 227.16 (2) (e), Stats., the Department of Revenue will adopt the following rule as proposed in this notice without public hearing unless, within 30 days after publication of this notice on February 1, 2000 , it is petitioned for a public hearing by 25 natural persons who will be affected by the rule, a municipality which will be affected by the rule, or an association which is representative of a farm, labor, business or professional group which will be affected by the rule.
Analysis Prepared by Dept. of Revenue
Statutory authority: s. 227.11 (2)
Statutes interpreted: ss. 66.058 (3) and 79.10 (10)
The lottery credit program was enacted by 1991 Wis. Act 39. Chapter Tax 20 was created to guide the administration of the lottery credit and first applied to the credit against 1991 property taxes. Chapter Tax 20 was amended to guide the administration of the lottery credit against property taxes for 1992 and thereafter.
