The rule affects how much atrazine can be applied and on which fields. Because overall use of atrazine will be reduced in the State, alternative weed control techniques may be needed in some situations. These techniques may include different crop rotations, reduced atrazine rates, either alone or in combination with other herbicides, or combinations of herbicides and mechanical weed control measures.
While alternative weed control techniques are available, adoption of these techniques on individual farms will in some cases require assistance. In the past this type of assistance has been provided by University Extension personnel and farm chemical dealers. In recent years many farmers have been using crop consultants to scout fields, identify specific pest problems and recommend control measures. The department anticipates these three information sources will continue to be used as the primary source of information, both on whether atrazine can be used and which alternatives are likely to work for each situation.
Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection
(CR 00-145)
An order relating to importing bovine animals, goats and cervids from “non-modified accredited" states.
Effective 5-1-01
Summary of final regulatory flexibility analysis
This rule will affect small businesses that import bovine animals, goats or cervids into this state. It requires the operator of those businesses to either refrain from importing bovine animals, goats or cervids from states the United States department of agriculture has designated as tuberculosis non-modified accredited states, or to comply with the standards this rule establishes to assure that the animals that are imported are not infected with bovine tuberculosis.
At the present time, the USDA has only designated one state, Michigan, as non-modified accredited. If the small business operator imports bovine animals, goats or cervids from Michigan, the operator will need to assure that the animal originates from a herd which has tested negative for tuberculosis within the past 12 months (there is an exception if the animal being imported is a veal calf less than 30 days of age) and that the animal has tested negative within the past 60 days (90 days for cervids). This places a burden on the business operator but it does not completely prohibit import of animals from Michigan. The burden of assuring that the animals have been properly tested is minimal compared to the burden that would be experienced by Wisconsin's animal agriculture industry if bovine tuberculosis is introduced to Wisconsin by an animal imported from a non-modified accredited state.
This rule requires persons, including small business operators, who import animals from non-modified accredited states to have the animals retested for tuberculosis after being imported. While these requirements add costs for the importer, the costs that would be incurred if infected animals are imported without these precautions are substantially higher. And, the importer has the ability to avoid these costs entirely by importing animals from other states of origin rather than from a non-modified accredited state.
Financial Institutions - Banking
(CR 00-166)
An order to repeal s. DFI-Bk 8.04 relating to stating name and location of office on bank checks.
Effective 5-1-01
Summary: This proposed repeal will not impact small business.
Comments
No comments were reported.
Health and Family Services
(CR 00-134)
Chapter HFS 97 - relating to complaint procedures for inmates of the Wisconsin Resource Center
Effective 5-1-01
Summary of final regulatory flexibility analysis
The rule changes will not affect small businesses as “small business" is defined in s. 227.114 (1) (a).
Comments
No comments were received.
Health and Family Services
(CR 00-150)
Chapter HFS 79 - relating to administration of supplemental security income (SSI), state supplemental payments to low-income elderly and disabled residents of Wisconsin and their dependent children.
Effective 5-1-01
Summary of final regulatory flexibility analysis
This rule affects the Department of Health and Family Services and the Department of Administration's Division of Hearings and Appeals. The promulgation of ch. HFS 79 will not affect “small business" as defined in s. 227.114 (1) (a).
Comments
No comments were received.
Health and Family Services
(CR 00-151)
Chapter HFS 133 - relating to home health licensure.
Effective 5-1-01
Summary of final regulatory flexibility analysis
This rule affects the Department of Health and Family Services and the Department of Administration's Division of Hearings and Appeals.
Based on 1998 reporting of gross patient revenue, 156 of 172 home health agencies met the definition of small business under s. 227.114 (1) (a). Under s. 227.19 (3) (e), the Department analyzed the effect of the proposed rule on these small businesses. To that end, the Department considered the information under s. 227.19 (3) (e) 1. to 6., Stats., in proposing these rules. The Department had the following conclusions:
1. The requirements the Department is filing are minimum standards needed to ensure the health, safety, and welfare of the patients being served by home health agencies regardless of an agency's size. Therefore, it is not feasible to exempt or create less stringent requirements for home health agencies that meet the definition of small business in s. 227.114 (1) (a).
2. The Department cannot revise the rule to reflect comments it received from small businesses regarding the proposed licensure fee structure both because of the current inequity resulting from the current licensure fee structure and the Department's urgent need to fund its home health agency regulatory activities.
The proposed rules will not require a small business to report any new information.
The Department's proposed method of fee calculation will create an equitable and stable funding source to support the Department's regulatory activities. Given that, and the fact that the Department considered the small business nature of many home health agencies in proposing its fee calculation methodology, the Department does not create exemptions or alternatives for small businesses to its calculation of license fees.
In promulgating this rule, small businesses raised issues with the proposed rules regarding patient discharge procedures. In response, the Department modified its draft to:
Allow appeal of a discharge, unless the discharge was ordered by the attending physician; and
Allow the home health agency to distribute its patient discharge summary only if it receives a request to do so.
3. Two of the revisions will require small businesses to expend additional resources: a requirement that home health agencies provide written notification to patients before or at the time of discharge and a requirement that home health agencies create a discharge summary report at the time a patient is discharged. Written notification of discharge will require additional resources to generate and mail discharge notices to all patients. Creation of a discharge summary will require appropriately qualified staff to create the discharge summary. The estimated cost of these requirements is difficult to quantify as some home health agencies already create the discharge summary. The cost for both requirements will depend on the number of patients served by the home health agency.
4. The proposed rules will not require any further costs for requirements since many of the provisions incorporate existing practices established in statewide variance.
5. The Department does not anticipate any additional costs to administer the proposed rules.
6. There will be no impact on the public's health, safety and welfare as the Department is not proposing to create less stringent requirements or exemptions from requirements of this rule for small businesses.
Comments
No comments were received.
Pharmacy Examining Board
(CR 00-48)
An order to create s. Phar 7.015, relating to delegation of duties by a pharmacist.
Effective 5-1-01
Summary of final regulatory flexibility analysis
These rules will have no significant economic impact on small businesses, as defined in s. 227.114 (1) (a), Stats.
Pharmacy Examining Board
(CR 00-156)
An order to amend s. Phar 7.01 (3), relating to supervising pharmacy interns.
Effective 5-1-01
Summary of final regulatory flexibility analysis
These rules will have no significant economic impact on small businesses, as defined in s. 227.114 (1) (a), Stats.
Comments
No comments were received.
Public Instruction
(CR 00-83)
An order making several minor modifications to align s. PI 14.03, minimum standards for audit and standard school district audit contracts.
Effective 5-1-01
Summary of final regulatory flexibility analysis
The rule changes will not affect “small business" as defined in s. 227.114 (1) (a), Stats.
Comments
No comments were received.
Transportation
(CR 00-152)
A rule relating to outdoor advertising sign annual fees.
Effective 5-1-01
Summary of final regulatory flexibility analysis
The Department expects that the fee schedule established in this rule revision will have a negligible adverse impact on small businesses that use outdoor advertising as a method of advertising. Small business that own signs will now be required to pay $35 or $50 each year for each sign they erect or maintain. Because the majority of small businesses typically own only two to six outdoor advertising signs, the annual impact is expected to be minimal. For those small businesses that are more reliant on outdoor advertising signs, the costs aspects of choosing this advertising medium will not be significantly impacted by the fees, which are relatively modest in relation to the cost or erecting an maintaining a sign or leasing sign space.
The annual sign fees that would be paid under this proposed rule by both small independent sign companies that own approximately 20-75 billboards and large sign companies that own hundreds of signs, are expected to be passed on to the advertisers. This new fee should not significantly affect the monthly lease rental rates charged by these companies for outdoor advertising and is not expected to have an effect on “small businesses" under s. 227.114, Stats.
These fees may have some impact on sign companies that fall within the definition of “small business" under s. 227.114, Stats., to the extent that these companies have entered into long term leases for sign space and are unable to pass through the cost to their customers until the lease is renewed. Industry testimony on this aspect of the rule, however, did not suggest that any sign companies would suffer economic hardship as a result of these fees.
Because the Department does not compile or maintain records reflecting the number of employees or annual income of sign companies, establishing less stringent requirements for sign companies that qualify as small businesses under s. 227.114(1)(a), Stats., is not feasible.
This rule making proposes to exempt signs under 8 square feet in area from an annual fee requirement. Also exempted are public utility, public service, political, real estate, official notice, farm and agricultural test plot signs.
Applicants for sign permits will be generally be required to pay the one-time $175 sign permit application fee. Exempted from this requirement are public utility, public service, real estate, farm, agricultural test plot, political, service club and religious notice and official signs. The Department has not collected sign permit application fees from these entities historically. The Department does not anticipate that the one-time $175 application fee structure will adversely affect small businesses.
Because the rule application process and annual fee billing and payment processes are relatively straightforward and simple, because many exemptions from fee requirements exist, and because DOT district sign permit coordinators are available to assist small businesses in completing permit applications and determining whether a proposed sign site is acceptable under s. 84.30, Stats., the Department concluded further simplifying the permit process or creating different deadline dates for small businesses is unwarranted.
Workforce Development
(CR 00-108)
Rules relating to the state directory of new hires.
Effective 5-1-01
Summary of final regulatory flexibility analysis
The proposed rules have no significant impact on small businesses, as defined in s. 227.114 (1) (a), Stats, since the requirement of employers to file new hire reports is already mandated by federal and state statutes. Six of the items required to be reported are mandated by federal law. Additional items required by rule are “date of birth," “date of hire," and “state in which the employee will work, if other than Wisconsin." The department will waive the “date of birth" requirement if it determines that the employer is unable to obtain it. “Date of hire" and “state in which the employee will work, if other than Wisconsin" are requested only to further the goals of the statutes and are not required if the employer fulfills the new hire filing requirement by submitting a completed W-4 form. These W-4 forms are already required for all businesses with employees under the Internal Revenue Code and therefore do not impose additional paperwork.
Comments
There were no comments.
Sections affected by rule revisions and corrections
Loading...
Loading...
Links to Admin. Code and Statutes in this Register are to current versions, which may not be the version that was referred to in the original published document.