STATE OF WISCONSIN
Occupational Therapists
Affiliated Crendentialing Board
IN THE MATTER OF RULE-MAKING PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE
OCCUPATIONAL THERAPISTS AFFILIATED CREDENTIALING BOARD
PROPOSED ORDER OF THE OCCUPATIONAL THERAPISTS
AFFILIATED CREDENTIALING BOARD ADOPTING RULES
(CLEARINGHOUSE RULE )
PROPOSED ORDER
An order of the Occupational Therapists Affiliated Credentialing Board to repeal OT 1.02 (17), 4.03 (2) (a), and 4.03 (2) (c) and (d); to amend OT 3.05 (title) and (intro.), 3.05 (2), 4.02 (2) (f), 4.03 (2) (title), 4.03 (2) (b), 4.03 (2) (e), 4.03 (3) (a), and 4.03 (3) (f); to create OT 3.05 (1) (title) and 3.05 (3) relating to self-referral of occupational therapy services.
Analysis prepared by the Department of Safety and Professional Services.
ANALYSIS
Statutes interpreted:
Statutory authority:
Explanation of agency authority:
Section 15.085 (5) (b), Stats., provides that affiliated credentialing boards such as the Occupational Therapists Affiliated Credentialing Board, “[s]hall promulgate rules for its own guidance and for the guidance of the trade or profession to which it pertains. . .” The proposed rule will provide guidance to occupational therapists regarding the topic of who may refer occupational therapy services. Section 227.11 (2) (a), Stats., provides that, “[e]ach agency may promulgate rules interpreting the provisions of any statute enforced or administered by the agency, if the agency considers it necessary to effectuate the purpose of the statute, but a rule is not valid if the rule exceeds the bounds of correct interpretation.” Section 440.08 (3) (b), Stats., provides that affiliated credentialing boards such as the Occupational Therapists Affiliated Credentialing Board, “[…] may promulgate rules requiring the holder of a credential who fails to renew the credential within 5 years after its renewal date to complete requirements in order to restore the credential, in addition to the applicable requirements for renewal established under chs. 440 to 480, that the […] affiliated credentialing board determines are necessary to protect the public health, safety, or welfare.” Section 448.965 (1) (c), Stats., provides that the affiliated credentialing board shall promulgate rules that establish, “[s]tandards of practice for occupational therapy, including a code of ethics and criteria for referral.” Related statute or rule:
None.
Plain language analysis:
Under the current administrative rules, an occupational therapist may receive an order or a referral to perform occupational therapy services for a patient. Orders identify the need for occupational therapy evaluation and intervention while a referral is the act of requesting occupational therapy services. Currently, physicians, dentists, or podiatrists may order occupational therapy evaluation. However, occupational therapists may accept referrals from a variety of health care professionals including advanced practice nurses, chiropractors, optometrists, physical therapists, and physician assistants (Wisconsin Administrative Code OT 4.03 (2) (b)). Furthermore, there are some services that occupational therapists can perform without the need of a referral such as consultation, habilitation, screening, client education, wellness, prevention, environmental assessments, and work-related ergonomic services. According to Wisconsin Administrative Code OT 4.03 (2) (e), neither an order nor a referral from a physician is required for evaluation or intervention if the occupational therapy services are provided in an educational environment, including in a child’s home if the child has disabilities.
The proposed rule seeks to clarify that occupational therapists are able to self-refer occupational therapy services along with the host of other health care professionals that are listed above. Currently, the rule allows other health care professionals to refer occupational therapy services. However, the current rule does not specifically state that occupational therapists are allowed to self-refer. The self-referral of occupational therapy services would allow patients greater access to health care and would alleviate the burden on occupational therapists of relying on receiving orders and referrals from other health care professionals in order to provide health care services. The proposed rule will also remove all references to orders received by health care professionals as this is outdated terminology that no longer reflects current practices.
The proposed rule will also provide clarity to the process of renewing a license after 5 years by updating provisions regarding late renewal and reinstatement. The term reinstatement will be defined as the process by which a licensee whose license has been surrendered or revoked or who holds a license with unmet disciplinary requirements that has not been renewed within five years of the renewal date may apply to have that license reinstated with or without conditions.
Summary of, and comparison with, existing or proposed federal regulation:
None.
