Wisconsin’s approved Consolidated State Plan may be viewed at the following link: https://dpi.wi.gov/sites/default/files/imce/esea/pdf/1%2012%2018%20WI%20Final%20ESSA%20Plan%20Submission.pdf
4.   The statutory authority for the proposed rule.
Pursuant to s. 115.28 (9), Stats., the State Superintendent has a duty to accept federal funds for any function over which the State Superintendent has jurisdiction and act as the agent for the receipt and disbursement of such funds. Under 227.11 (2) (a) (intro.), Stats., “[e]ach agency may promulgate rules interpreting the provisions of any statute enforced or administered by the agency, if the agency considers it necessary to effectuate the purpose of the statute, but a rule is not valid if the rule exceeds the bounds of correct interpretation.” See also, Wisconsin Ass'n of State Prosecutors v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Comm'n, 2018 WI 17, ¶ 42 (“statutory mandates are also statutory authorizations, and authorization of an act also authorizes a necessary predicate act.”)(internal citations omitted).
Federal funds appropriated for the State under the ESEA as amended by the ESSA are, in part, conditioned upon compliance with 20 USC 6311(b) and (d). These sections require the Department identify schools for Comprehensive or Targeted Support and Intervention in SY 2018-19 and beyond. As such, a rule to implement an ESSA-compliant accountability system is necessary for the receipt and disbursement of federal funds under the ESEA.
5.   An estimate of the amount of time agency employees will spend developing the proposed rule and of other resources needed to develop the rule.
The amount of time needed for rule development by Department staff and the amount of other resources necessary are minimal.
6.   A description of all of the entities that will be affected by the proposed rule.
The proposed rule would impact local education agencies.
7.   A summary and preliminary comparison of any existing or proposed federal regulation that addresses or is intended to address the activities to be regulated by the proposed rule.
None.
8.   Anticipated economic impact of implementing the rule (note if the rule is likely to have a significant economic impact on small businesses).
The proposed rules will have no significant economic impact on small businesses, as defined in s. 227.114 (1), Stats.
Contact information
Carl Bryan
Policy and Budget Team
(608) 267-9127
Loading...
Loading...
Links to Admin. Code and Statutes in this Register are to current versions, which may not be the version that was referred to in the original published document.