Chapter UWS 18.11 also includes UWS 18.11(3), Improper Use of Telephones. UWS 18.11(3) generally prohibits the use of a telephone to intentionally harass another person. The section uses the term “offend” in addition to “harass.” After careful consideration, the Board believes that the protections provided by UWS 18.11(1) and (3) would be maintained and enhanced by removing the references to “annoy” and “offend” and by expanding the prohibition of intentional harassment through electronic communications or telephone calls to include all electronic communications or telephone calls that use truly threatening or intimidating language. The prohibition on intentional harassment would not be limited to obscene, lewd or profane language or language suggesting any lewd or lascivious act.
4. Detailed explanation of statutory authority for the rule (including the statutory citation and language):
Wisconsin Statute § 36.09(1) states: “The primary responsibility for governance of the system shall be vested in the board which shall enact policies and promulgate rules for governing the system.” Wisconsin Statute § 36.11(1)(a) states: “The board may promulgate rules under ch.227 to protect the lives, health and safety of persons on property under its jurisdiction and to protect such property and prevent obstruction of the functions of the system” Wisconsin Statute § 36.11(1)(b) states: “The board may promulgate rules under ch.227 for the management of all property under its jurisdiction, for the care and preservation thereof and for the promotion and preservation of the orderly operation of system in any or all or its authorized activities and in any or all of its institutions . . . .” 5. Estimate of amount of time that state employees will spend developing the rule and of other resources necessary to develop the rule:
50 hours
6. List with description of all entities that may be affected by the proposed rule:
All University of Wisconsin institutions, and persons subject to the provisions of Chapter UWS 18. 7. Summary and preliminary comparison with any existing or proposed federal regulation that is intended to address the activities to be regulated by the proposed rule:
N/A
8. Anticipated economic impact of implementing the rule (note if the rule is likely to have a significant economic impact on small businesses):
There is no anticipated economic impact of the proposed rule.
Contact Person: Raymond Cross, President of the University of Wisconsin System, 608-262-2321
