Section 227.11 (2) (a), Stats., expressly confers rule-making authority on each agency to promulgate rules interpreting the provisions of any statute enforced or administered by the agency if the agency considers it necessary to effectuate the purpose of the statute.
Summary of the Rule
The rules make changes related to new federal regulations for the Child Care Development Fund (CCDF) under 45 CFR Part 98. CCDF is a major funding source for the child care subsidy program. The primary focus of the applicable CCDF regulations is supporting continuity of care for children and financial stability for families.
In general, a child care administrative agency determines the assistance group’s child care needs following the parent’s eligibility determination and 12 months later following the parent’s eligibility redetermination. If a parent is expecting a change that may affect the assistance group’s child care needs, the child care administrative agency will issue an authorization that ends on the date of the expected change.
The CCDF regulations and the proposed rules allow a parent to continue to receive subsidized child care for up to the same number of hours as the parent’s previous authorization at the following times:
The parent is continuing to participate in an approved activity, but the number of hours that the assistance group needs child care is decreasing.
The parent is taking a temporary break from an approved activity for no more than 3 months.
The parent is in an approved activity search period following the end of any participation in an approved activity for no more than 3 months.
The proposed rules create exceptions to the continuity of care provisions in certain situations. During a 12-month eligibility period, a child care administrative agency is required to conduct a new assessment of the assistance group’s child care needs and issue a new authorization based on the assessment at all of the following times:
When a second parent or a teen parent of the child moves into the household.
When the parent requests an authorization for subsidized child care more than one calendar month after the parent’s previous authorization ended.
When the assistance group’s child care needs no longer align with the child care provider’s hours of operation.
When the parent changes child care providers.
When the school year begins for a school-aged child.
When a parent has reached the 24th month of the education time limit under s. 49.155 (1m) (a) 4. or 5., Stats.
Copayment amounts
During a parent’s 12-month eligibility period, the copayment amount may only be increased for the following reasons:
The increased copayment amount corresponds to an increase in the number of hours authorized for a child care subsidy to the parent.
The income of the assistance group was at or above 190 percent of the federal poverty level but under 200 percent at the parent’s last eligibility redetermination; the increased copayment amount corresponds to an increase in the federal poverty level of the assistance group; and the copayment amount does not exceed the amount that is assessed for an assistance group at 200 percent of the federal poverty level.
The income of the assistance group was at or above 200 percent of the federal poverty level at the parent’s last eligibility redetermination and the parent’s copayment is increasing by $1 for every $3 increase in income over 200 percent of the federal poverty level, as provided under s. 49.155 (1m) (c) 1d., Stats.
Under the current rules, a parent’s copayment amount is based on the size of the group, gross income, and the number of children in child care. If a child attends child care 20 hours or fewer per week, the copayment is 50 percent of the full-time amount.
The proposed rules add “the number of hours authorized for a child care subsidy” as a factor to be used in determining the copayment amount, along with group size, gross income, and the number of children in child care. The proposed rules repeal the 50 percent reduction for 20 or fewer hours per week. These changes will allow for a gradual increase in a parent’s copayment as the parent’s authorized hours increase rather than a disproportionate increase in the copayment amount when the parent’s hours increase from 20 or fewer to 21 hours per week.
If a parent no longer meets the conditions of eligibility for a copayment exception during the 12-month eligibility period, the parent may continue to qualify for the exception until the parent’s next eligibility redetermination.
Asset limits
Section 49.155 (1m) (cm), Stats., as created by 2017 Wisconsin Act 59, provides that an assistance group may not have liquid assets that exceed $25,000 and directs the department to promulgate a rule to specify financial resources to be excluded. The rules provide that financial resources that are not cash on hand or funds in checking, savings, money market, or credit union share accounts that can be withdrawn without incurring penalties are excluded from the liquid asset limit.
Section 49.155 (1m) (cr), Stats., as created by 2017 Wisconsin Act 269, prohibits a family from owning vehicles with a combined equity of more than $20,000 or a home valued at more than 200 percent of the state median value for homes. Section 49.155 (2m), Stats., allows the department to promulgate rules creating hardship exemptions. The department’s rules provide exemptions for a child’s foster parent, kinship care relative providing care under a court order, and subsidized guardian or interim caretaker. The rules also create an exemption if ownership of an applicable asset is unclear to the child care administrative agency due to a recent death or change in the composition of the assistance group or if the assistance group is homeless.
Other changes
Child care statutory authority, definitions, and hearing procedures are added in ch. DCF 102, Child Support Cooperation for Wisconsin Works.
Exceptions to the address verification requirements are created for homeless families and for persons registered under the address confidentiality program under s. 165.68, Stats.,
If the governor declares an emergency under s. 323.10, Stats., an authorization for child care for a provider that is within the the area covered by the declaration of emergency and is temporarily closed may be used at another provider.
The provisions on backdating an authorization also apply at a parent’s redetermination.
Summary of Factual Data and Analytical Methodologies
The rules include changes related to federal regulations implementing the Child Care Development Block Grant Act of 2014 and rules required under 2017 Wisconsin Acts 59 and 269.
Summary of Related Federal Law
45 CFR 98.20 Eligibility for Child Care Assistance
(a) For a family to be eligible for child care assistance, the following requirements must be met at the time of eligibility determination or redetermination:
The child shall be under 13 years of age or, at a State’s option, under age 19 and physically or mentally incapable of caring for himself or herself.
The family’s income may not exceed 85 percent of the State’s median income (SMI) for a family of the same size.
The family’s assets may not exceed $1,000,000 (as certified by a family member).
The child’s parents shall be working or attending a job training or educational program; or the child shall be receiving, or need to receive, protective services, which may include specific populations of vulnerable children as identified by the State.
o
A State may waive income and asset requirements for the family of a child who is receiving, or needs to receive, protective services, on a case-by-case basis or, if defined in the State plan, for all children in foster care.
(b) A State may establish additional eligibility conditions, but these conditions may not impact eligibility at any time other than eligibility determination or redetermination.
45 CFR 98.21 Eligibility Determination Processes
(a) A State shall redetermine a family’s eligibility for child care assistance no sooner than 12 months following the initial determination or most recent redetermination, subject to the following:
During the period of time between determinations or redeterminations of eligibility, the family shall be considered eligible and shall receive services at least at the same level, regardless of the following:
o
A change in family income as long as the family’s income does not exceed 85% of the SMI for a family of the same size.
o
A temporary change or cessation of work or attendance at a training program that does not exceed 3 months.
A State may discontinue assistance due to a parent’s loss of work or cessation of attendance at a job training or educational program that is not a temporary change, but assistance must be continued at least at the same level after each such loss or cessation until the earlier of the following:
o
3 months after the parent’s loss of work or cessation of attendance at the job training or educational program.
o
The parent’s next annual redetermination of eligibility.
Notwithstanding the 12-month eligibility period, a State may discontinue assistance prior to a family’s next redetermination in the following limited circumstances:
o
Excessive unexplained absences despite multiple attempts by the State to contact the family and provider, including prior notification of possible discontinuation of assistance. If the State chooses this option, it shall define the number of unexplained absences that shall be considered excessive.
o
A change in residency outside of the State.
o
Substantiated fraud or intentional program violations that invalidate prior determinations of eligibility.
A State cannot increase family copayment amounts within the minimum 12-month eligibility period, except during the graduated phase-out under (b).
(b) A State may establish initial income eligibility for a family at a level less than the CCDF level of 85 percent of the SMI for a family of the same size but must provide a graduated phase-out by implementing two-tiered eligibility thresholds, with the second tier used at the time of eligibility redetermination.
The second tier may be set at 85 percent of the SMI or an amount that is lower than 85 percent of the SMI and higher than the State’s initial eligibility level.
To help families transition off of child care assistance, a State may gradually adjust copay amounts for families under graduated phase-out conditions. During the graduated phase-out, the State may require additional reporting on changes in family income, provided the requirements do not constitute an undue burden.
(c) A State shall establish processes for initial determination and redetermination of eligibility that take into account irregular fluctuation in earnings and ensure that temporary increases do not affect family eligibility or copayments, including temporary increases that result in family income exceeding 85 percent of the SMI.
(e) A State shall require families to report a change at any point during the minimum 12-month period, limited to the following:
o
If the family’s income exceeds 85 percent of the SMI, taking into account irregular income fluctuations.
o
At the option of the State, the family has experienced a non-temporary cessation of work, training, or education.
A State may impose additional requirements on parents to report a change in circumstances as long as the requirements do not constitute an undue burden on families. Any additional reporting requirements shall be limited to items that impact a family’s CCDF eligibility or those that enable the State to contact the family or pay providers.
o
During a period of graduated phase-out, a State may require additional reporting on changes in family income for the gradual adjustment of family copayments, if desired.
A State must allow families the option to voluntarily report changes on an ongoing basis.
Loading...
Loading...
Links to Admin. Code and Statutes in this Register are to current versions, which may not be the version that was referred to in the original published document.