LRBa1782/3
PJK&MGG:jlg:hmh
1997 - 1998 LEGISLATURE
SENATE AMENDMENT 1,
TO 1997 SENATE BILL 459
March 19, 1998 - Offered by Senator Shibilski.
SB459-SA1,1,11 At the locations indicated, amend the bill as follows:
SB459-SA1,1,3 21. Page 1, line 3: after "streams" insert "and requiring construction for
3shoreline erosion control under certain circumstances".
SB459-SA1,1,4 42. Page 2, line 1 before that line insert:
SB459-SA1,1,5 5" Section 1b. 30.02 (3) of the statutes is amended to read:
SB459-SA1,2,56 30.02 (3) Upon receipt of a complete permit application or a request for a
7determination under s. 236.16 (3) (d)
, the department shall either schedule a hearing
8or provide notice stating that it will proceed on the application or request without a
9hearing if, within 30 days after the publication of the notice, no substantive written
10objection to issuance of the permit is received within 30 days after publication of the
11notice
or no request for a hearing concerning the determination under s. 236.16 (3)
12(d) is received
. The notice shall be provided to the clerk of each municipality in which
13the project is located and to any other person required by law to receive notice. The

1department may provide notice to other persons as it deems appropriate. The
2department shall provide a copy of the notice to the applicant, who shall publish it
3as a class 1 notice under ch. 985 in a newspaper designated by the department that
4is likely to give notice in the area affected. The applicant shall file proof of publication
5with the department.
SB459-SA1, s. 1c 6Section 1c. 30.02 (4) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:
SB459-SA1,2,107 30.02 (4) (a) If a public hearing is ordered, the division of hearings and appeals
8shall mail a written notice at least 10 days before the hearing to each person given
9notice under sub. (3) and in the case of an application for a permit, to any person who
10submitted a substantive written objection to issuance of the permit.".
SB459-SA1,2,11 113. Page 2, line 1: delete " Section 1" and substitute "Section 1m".
SB459-SA1,2,13 124. Page 2, line 18: delete the material beginning with that line and ending with
13page 3, line 7, and substitute:
SB459-SA1,2,14 14" Section 4c. 236.16 (3) of the statutes is amended to read:
SB459-SA1,2,2215 236.16 (3) Lake and stream shore plats. (a) All subdivisions abutting on a
16navigable lake or stream shall provide public access at least 60 feet wide providing
17access to the low watermark so that there will be public access, which is connected
18to existing public roads, at not more than one-half mile intervals as measured along
19the lake or stream shore except where greater intervals and wider access is agreed
20upon by the department of natural resources and the department, and excluding
21shore areas where public parks or open-space streets or roads on either side of a
22stream are provided.
SB459-SA1,2,24 23(b) No public access established under this chapter may be vacated except by
24circuit court action. This as provided in s. 236.43.
SB459-SA1,3,2
1(c) Except as provided in par. (d), this subsection does not require any local unit
2of government to improve land provided for public access.
SB459-SA1, s. 4e 3Section 4e. 236.16 (3) (d) of the statutes is created to read:
SB459-SA1,3,144 236.16 (3) (d) All of the owners of all of the land adjacent to a public access
5established under par. (a) to an inland lake, as defined in s. 30.92 (1) (bk), may
6petition the city, village, town or county that owns the public access to construct
7shoreline erosion control measures. Subject to par. (e), the city, village, town or
8county shall construct the requested shoreline erosion control measures or request
9the department of natural resources to determine the need for shoreline erosion
10control measures. Upon receipt of a request under this paragraph from a city, village,
11town or county, the department of natural resources shall follow the procedures in
12s. 30.02 (3) and (4). Subject to par. (e), the city, village, town or county shall construct
13shoreline erosion control measures as required by the department of natural
14resources if the department of natural resources determines all of the following:
SB459-SA1,3,1515 1. Erosion is evident along the shoreline in the vicinity of the public access.
SB459-SA1,3,1816 2. The shoreline erosion control measures proposed by the owners of the
17property adjacent to the public access are designed according to accepted
18engineering practices.
SB459-SA1,3,2219 3. Sufficient property owners, in addition to the owners of all property adjacent
20to the public access, have agreed to construct shoreline erosion control measures so
21that the shoreline erosion control project is likely to be effective in controlling erosion
22at the location of the public access and its vicinity.
SB459-SA1,4,223 4. The shoreline erosion control project is not likely to be effective in controlling
24erosion at the location of the public access and its vicinity if the city, village, town or

1county does not construct shoreline erosion control measures on the land provided
2for public access.
SB459-SA1, s. 4g 3Section 4g. 236.16 (3) (e) of the statutes is created to read:
SB459-SA1,4,64 236.16 (3) (e) A city, village, town or county may not be required to construct
5shoreline erosion control measures under par. (d) on land other than land provided
6for public access.
SB459-SA1, s. 4i 7Section 4i. 236.16 (3) (f) of the statutes is created to read:
SB459-SA1,4,98 236.16 (3) (f) Paragraphs (b) to (e) apply to public access that exists on, or that
9is established after, the effective date of this paragraph .... [revisor inserts date].".
Loading...
Loading...