CORRECTED COPY
LRBs0309/1
EVM:jld&wlj:jm
2011 - 2012 LEGISLATURE
ASSEMBLY SUBSTITUTE AMENDMENT 1,
TO 2011 ASSEMBLY BILL 491
February 6, 2012 - Offered by Representative Petrowski.
AB491-ASA1,1,2 1An Act to amend 343.305 (8) (b) 1. of the statutes; relating to: hearings
2regarding administrative suspension of operating privilege.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau
Current law prohibits a person from driving or operating a motor vehicle with
a prohibited concentration of alcohol or a detectable amount of a controlled substance
or while under the influence of an intoxicant (OWI). If a chemical test given to the
person on suspicion of, or subsequent to arrest for, OWI indicates that the person has
committed OWI, the law enforcement officer seizes the driver's license of the person,
informs the person that his or her operating privilege is administratively suspended
for six months, and provides the person with a written explanation of his or her right
to request a review of the administrative suspension.
The person may, within ten days, submit a written request for the Department
of Transportation (DOT) to review his or her administrative suspension. If a hearing
is requested, DOT must hold the review hearing in the county where the alleged
offense took place within 30 days of the date on which the person received the written
explanation of his or her right to review. A person is allowed to present evidence and
be represented by counsel at a review hearing. Unless subpoenaed, the arresting
officer need not appear at the review hearing, but must provide a copy of his or her
report and the results of the chemical test.
This substitute amendment allows DOT, upon request by the person seeking
review, to conduct a review hearing by telephone, video conference, or other remote

communication mechanism or by review of the record submitted by the arresting
officer and written arguments. If a review hearing is by remote communication
mechanism or record review, DOT need not hold the hearing in the county in which
the offense allegedly took place. The substitute amendment also provides that the
arresting officer need not appear in person at a hearing conducted by remote
communication mechanism or record review.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do
enact as follows:
AB491-ASA1, s. 1 1Section 1. 343.305 (8) (b) 1. of the statutes is amended to read:
AB491-ASA1,2,192 343.305 (8) (b) 1. Within 10 days after the notification under par. (a), or, if the
3notification is by mail, within 13 days, excluding Saturdays, Sundays and holidays,
4after the date of the mailing, the person may request, in writing, that the department
5review the administrative suspension. The review procedure is not subject to ch. 227.
6The Unless the hearing is by remote communication mechanism or record review, the
7department shall hold the hearing on the matter in the county in which the offense
8allegedly occurred or at the nearest office of the department if the offense allegedly
9occurred in a county in which the department does not maintain an office. The
10department, upon request of the person, may conduct a hearing under this
11paragraph by telephone, video conference, or other remote communication
12mechanism or by review of only the record submitted by the arresting officer and
13written arguments.
The department shall hold a hearing regarding the
14administrative suspension within 30 days after the date of notification under par. (a).
15The person may present evidence and may be represented by counsel. The arresting
16officer need not appear at the administrative hearing unless subpoenaed under s.
17805.07 and need not appear in person at a hearing conducted by remote
18communication mechanism or record review
, but he or she must submit a copy of his
19or her report and the results of the chemical test to the hearing examiner.
AB491-ASA1, s. 2
1Section 2. Initial applicability.
AB491-ASA1,3,32 (1) This act first applies to a hearing requested on the effective date of this
3subsection.
Loading...
Loading...