Skip navigation Wisconsin State Legislature
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 19; noes, 14; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Cowles, Darling, Farrow, S. Fitzgerald, Gudex, Harsdorf, Lasee, Lazich, LeMahieu, Marklein, Moulton, Nass, Olsen, Petrowski, Roth, Stroebel, Tiffany, Vukmir and Wanggaard - 19.
Noes - Senators Bewley, Carpenter, Erpenbach, Hansen, Harris Dodd, C. Larson, Lassa, Miller, Ringhand, Risser, Shilling, L. Taylor, Vinehout and Wirch - 14.
Absent or not voting - None.
Tabled.
Senator LeMahieu moved that Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 96 be laid on the table.
The question was: Shall Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 96 be laid on the table?
Tabled.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Fitzgerald, with unanimous consent, asked that the rules be suspended and the bill be given its third reading.
Senate Bill 96
Read a third time and passed.
Senate Bill 97
Relating to: including orders pertaining to household pets in certain restraining orders and injunctions.
Read a second time.
The question was: Adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 97?
Adopted.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Fitzgerald, with unanimous consent, asked that the rules be suspended and the bill be given its third reading.
Senate Bill 97
Read a third time passed.
Senate Bill 117
Relating to: battery and threats to a judge, a prosecutor, or a law enforcement officer and providing a criminal penalty.
Read a second time.
The question was: Adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 117?
Adopted.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Fitzgerald, with unanimous consent, asked that the rules be suspended and the bill be given its third reading.
Senate Bill 117
Read a third time and passed.
Senator Fitzgerald, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate Bills 50, 51, 52, and 54 be withdrawn from the committee on Senate Organization and taken up at this time.
Senate Bill 50
Relating to: industrial zoning requirements in tax incremental districts, planning commission notice for tax incremental district amendments, obsolete references relating to tax incremental districts, allocation of tax increments, joint review board review, and calculation of levy limits following dissolution of a tax incremental district.
Read a second time.
The question was: Adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 50?
Adopted.
Senator Gudex moved that Senate Amendment 2 to Senate Bill 50 be laid on the table.
The question was: Shall Senate Amendment 2 to Senate Bill 50 be laid on the table?
Tabled.
The question was: Adoption of Senate Amendment 3 to Senate Bill 50?
Adopted.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Fitzgerald, with unanimous consent, asked that the rules be suspended and the bill be given its third reading.
Senate Bill 50
Read a third time.
The question was: Passage of Senate Bill 50?
The ayes and noes were required and the vote was: ayes, 33; noes, 0; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Bewley, Carpenter, Cowles, Darling, Erpenbach, Farrow, S. Fitzgerald, Gudex, Hansen, Harris Dodd, Harsdorf, C. Larson, Lasee, Lassa, Lazich, LeMahieu, Marklein, Miller, Moulton, Nass, Olsen, Petrowski, Ringhand, Risser, Roth, Shilling, Stroebel, L. Taylor, Tiffany, Vinehout, Vukmir, Wanggaard and Wirch - 33.
Noes - None.
Absent or not voting - None.
Passed.
Senate Bill 51
Relating to: standing joint review boards, annual joint review board meetings, annual reports on tax incremental districts, and granting rule-making authority.
Read a second time.
The question was: Adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 51?
Adopted.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Fitzgerald, with unanimous consent, asked that the rules be suspended and the bill be given its third reading.
Senate Bill 51
Read a third time.
The question was: Passage of Senate Bill 51?
The ayes and noes were required and the vote was: ayes, 33; noes, 0; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Bewley, Carpenter, Cowles, Darling, Erpenbach, Farrow, S. Fitzgerald, Gudex, Hansen, Harris Dodd, Harsdorf, C. Larson, Lasee, Lassa, Lazich, LeMahieu, Marklein, Miller, Moulton, Nass, Olsen, Petrowski, Ringhand, Risser, Roth, Shilling, Stroebel, L. Taylor, Tiffany, Vinehout, Vukmir, Wanggaard and Wirch - 33.
Noes - None.
Absent or not voting - None.
Passed.
Senate Bill 52
Relating to: modifying the requirements for sharing tax increments by tax incremental districts, limiting the participation of certain special purpose districts in tax incremental district financing, and authorizing any tax incremental district to use allocated tax increments donated from another tax incremental district.
Read a second time.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Fitzgerald, with unanimous consent, asked that the rules be suspended and the bill be given its third reading.
Senate Bill 52
Read a third time.
The question was: Passage of Senate Bill 52?
The ayes and noes were required and the vote was: ayes, 33; noes, 0; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Bewley, Carpenter, Cowles, Darling, Erpenbach, Farrow, S. Fitzgerald, Gudex, Hansen, Harris Dodd, Harsdorf, C. Larson, Lasee, Lassa, Lazich, LeMahieu, Marklein, Miller, Moulton, Nass, Olsen, Petrowski, Ringhand, Risser, Roth, Shilling, Stroebel, L. Taylor, Tiffany, Vinehout, Vukmir, Wanggaard and Wirch - 33.
Noes - None.
Absent or not voting - None.
Passed.
Senate Bill 54
Relating to: inclusion of vacant land within the boundaries of a tax incremental district and exclusion of tax-exempt city-owned property from the initial tax incremental base of a tax incremental district.
Read a second time.
The question was: Adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 54?
Adopted.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Fitzgerald, with unanimous consent, asked that the rules be suspended and the bill be given its third reading.
Senate Bill 54
Read a third time.
The question was: Passage of Senate Bill 54?
Loading...
Loading...