LRB-1423/2
MDK:wlj&jld:ch
2005 - 2006 LEGISLATURE
December 27, 2005 - Introduced by Law Revision Committee. Referred to
Committee on Housing and Financial Institutions.
SB497,1,4 1An Act to renumber and amend 218.0143 (1); and to consolidate, renumber
2and amend
218.0143 (2) and (3) of the statutes; relating to: insurance
3requirements for motor vehicle retail installment contracts (suggested as
4remedial legislation by the Department of Financial Institutions).
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau
Under former law, a seller of a motor vehicle under a retail installment contract
that provided insurance coverage was required to include public liability coverage
with the insurance coverage, or notify the buyer that public liability coverage was
not included with the coverage. In 2000, the law was amended so that, under current
law, a seller is required to make such a notification only if the retail installment
contract does not provide any insurance coverage.
This bill eliminates the 2000 amendment and restores the former law described
above.
For further information, see the Notes provided by the Law Revision
Committee of the Joint Legislative Council.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do
enact as follows:
Law Revision Committee prefatory note: This bill is a remedial legislation
proposal, requested by the Department of Financial Institutions and introduced by the

Law Revision Committee under s. 13.83 (1) (c) 4., stats. After careful consideration of the
various provisions of the bill, the Law Revision Committee has determined that this bill
makes minor substantive changes in the statutes, and that these changes are desirable
as a matter of public policy.
SB497, s. 1 1Section 1. 218.0143 (1) of the statutes is renumbered 218.0143 (intro.) and
2amended to read:
SB497,2,6 3218.0143 Notice of insurance to buyer under installment sales
4contract.
(intro.) Whenever a person sells or agrees to sell any motor vehicle at
5retail under a retail installment contract that provides for insurance coverage, or a
6charge is made for insurance coverage, the seller shall do one of the following:
SB497,2,9 7(1m) Ensure that the policy so issued or provided for shall include includes
8public liability coverage protecting the driver of the motor vehicle against damages
9resulting from the negligent use of the vehicle.
SB497, s. 2 10Section 2. 218.0143 (2) and (3) of the statutes are consolidated, renumbered
11218.0143 (2) and amended to read:
SB497,2,2112 218.0143 (2) Whenever a person sells or agrees to sell any motor vehicle at
13retail under a retail installment contract which does not provide for insurance
14coverage the seller shall, in writing, notify
Notify, in writing, the buyer at the time
15of making the retail installment contract that the motor vehicle is not covered by
16public liability insurance protecting the driver against damages resulting from the
17negligent use of the vehicle. (3) The seller shall and obtain, on a form separate from
18the retail installment contract, the signed acknowledgment of the buyer that he or
19she has been notified that the contract does or does not include public liability
20insurance protecting the driver against damages resulting from the negligent use of
21the vehicle.
Note: Before its treatment by 1999 Wisconsin Act 31, s. 218.01 (6m), 1997 stats.,
provided that, if insurance coverage was included with a motor vehicle retail installment

contract, the policy must include public liability insurance (PLI) coverage or the seller
was required to notify the buyer that the motor vehicle was not covered by PLI coverage.
Following its treatment by 1999 Wisconsin Act 31, renumbered s. 218.0143 (1) now
provides that, if insurance coverage is part of a motor vehicle retail installment contract,
the policy issued must include PLI coverage; and, under s. 218.0143 (2), only if insurance
coverage is not included with a retail installment contract must the seller notify the buyer
that the vehicle is not covered by PLI coverage.
It appears that 1999 Wisconsin Act 31 intended no substantive change (it was a
revisor's revision bill). The change proposed by the department of financial institutions
will restore the affected provisions to their pre-Act 99 status.
SB497,3,11 (End)
Loading...
Loading...