LRB-1919/1
CMH:kjf:jf
2007 - 2008 LEGISLATURE
May 15, 2007 - Introduced by Representatives Gundrum, Hraychuck, Kestell,
Berceau, Ballweg, A. Ott, Bies, Petrowski, Gunderson, Hahn, Albers,
Mursau, Townsend, Friske
and Nygren, cosponsored by Senators Darling,
Kedzie
and Roessler. Referred to Committee on Judiciary and Ethics.
AB335,1,2 1An Act to amend 970.03 (4) (a) of the statutes; relating to: preliminary
2hearings for allegations of sexual exploitation by a therapist.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, a preliminary hearing is a hearing before a court to
determine if probable cause exists to believe the defendant has committed a felony.
If the defendant is accused of first-degree sexual assault, sexual assault of a child,
sexual exploitation of a child, or incest with a child, the court may exclude from the
hearing all persons who are not court officers, family members of the complainant
or the defendant, or other persons required to attend if the court finds that the state
or the defendant has established a compelling interest that would likely be
prejudiced if the persons were not excluded. A compelling interest could be the need
to protect the complainant from undue embarrassment and emotional trauma.
This bill adds sexual exploitation by a therapist to the list of felonies for which
the preliminary hearing may be closed.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do
enact as follows:
AB335, s. 1 3Section 1. 970.03 (4) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB335,2,84 970.03 (4) (a) If the defendant is accused of a crime under s. 940.22, 940.225,
5948.02, 948.025, 948.05, 948.06, 948.085, or 948.095, the court may exclude from the

1hearing all persons who are not officers of the court, members of the complainant's
2or defendant's families or others considered by the court to be supportive of the
3complainant or defendant, the service representative, as defined in s. 895.45 (1) (c),
4or other persons required to attend, if the court finds that the state or the defendant
5has established a compelling interest that would likely be prejudiced if the persons
6were not excluded. The court may consider as a compelling interest, among others,
7the need to protect a complainant from undue embarrassment and emotional
8trauma.
AB335,2,99 (End)
Loading...
Loading...