LRB-0008/1
BAB:kjf:nwn
2007 - 2008 LEGISLATURE
May 29, 2007 - Introduced by Representatives Friske, Vos, Bies, Gunderson,
Mursau, Jeskewitz, Albers, Hahn, Musser
and Townsend, cosponsored by
Senators Schultz, Grothman, Leibham and Darling. Referred to Committee
on Judiciary and Ethics.
AB372,1,4 1An Act to repeal 227.485 (2) (b), (c) and (d), 227.485 (7), 814.245 (2) (a), (b) and
2(c) and 814.245 (8); and to amend 106.20 (1) (f), 227.485 (3), 227.485 (6) and
3814.245 (3) of the statutes; relating to: awarding costs in administrative
4agency actions.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, if an individual, small nonprofit corporation, or a small
business is the prevailing party in an administrative agency contested case, in an
action brought by an agency, or in a judicial review proceeding under s. 227.485 (6),
that prevailing party is entitled to an award of costs unless the court finds the agency
was substantially justified in taking its position or if such an award would be unjust
under the circumstances. If the prevailing party is an individual, that party is not
entitled to recover costs if the party's federal adjusted gross income was $150,000 or
more in each of the three years prior to the commencement of the action.
This bill eliminates financial and entity size limitations for prevailing parties
to be eligible to receive costs in administrative agency actions, allowing an award of
costs to all persons who are prevailing parties unless the court finds the agency was
substantially justified in taking its position or if such an award would be unjust
under the circumstances.

For further information see the state fiscal estimate, which will be printed as
an appendix to this bill.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do
enact as follows:
AB372, s. 1 1Section 1. 106.20 (1) (f) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB372,2,52 106.20 (1) (f) "Small business" has the meaning given in s. 227.485 (2) (c) means
3a business entity, including its affiliates, which is independently owned and
4operated, and which employs 25 or fewer full-time employees or which has gross
5annual sales of less than $5,000,000
.
AB372, s. 2 6Section 2. 227.485 (2) (b), (c) and (d) of the statutes are repealed.
AB372, s. 3 7Section 3. 227.485 (3) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB372,2,148 227.485 (3) In any contested case in which an individual, a small nonprofit
9corporation or a small business
a person other than the state is the prevailing party
10and submits a motion for costs under this section, the hearing examiner shall award
11the prevailing party the costs incurred in connection with the contested case, unless
12the hearing examiner finds that the state agency which is the losing party was
13substantially justified in taking its position or that special circumstances exist that
14would make the award unjust.
AB372, s. 4 15Section 4. 227.485 (6) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB372,3,216 227.485 (6) A final decision under sub. (5) is subject to judicial review under
17s. 227.52. If the individual, small nonprofit corporation or small business a person
18other than the state
is the prevailing party in the proceeding for judicial review, the
19court shall make the findings applicable under s. 814.245 and, if appropriate, award
20costs related to that proceeding under s. 814.245, regardless of who petitions for

1judicial review. In addition, the court on review may modify the order for payment
2of costs in the final decision under sub. (5).
AB372, s. 5 3Section 5. 227.485 (7) of the statutes is repealed.
AB372, s. 6 4Section 6. 814.245 (2) (a), (b) and (c) of the statutes are repealed.
AB372, s. 7 5Section 7. 814.245 (3) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB372,3,126 814.245 (3) Except as provided in s. 814.25, if an individual, a small nonprofit
7corporation or a small business
a person other than the state is the prevailing party
8in any action by a state agency or in any proceeding for judicial review under s.
9227.485 (6) and submits a motion for costs under this section, the court shall award
10costs to the prevailing party, unless the court finds that the state agency was
11substantially justified in taking its position or that special circumstances exist that
12would make the award unjust.
AB372, s. 8 13Section 8. 814.245 (8) of the statutes is repealed.
AB372, s. 9 14Section 9. Initial applicability.
AB372,3,1915 (1) The treatment of sections 106.20 (1) (f), 227.485 (3), 227.485 (6), and 814.245
16(3) of the statutes and the repeal of sections 227.485 (2) (b), (c), and (d), 227.485 (7),
17814.245 (2) (a), (b), and (c), and 814.245 (8) of the statutes first applies to
18administrative agency contested cases, actions by a state agency and judicial review
19proceedings under s. 227.485 (6), commenced on the effective date of this subsection.
AB372, s. 10 20Section 10. Effective date.
AB372,3,2221 (1) This act takes effect on the first day of the 4th month beginning after
22publication.
AB372,3,2323 (End)
Loading...
Loading...