LRB-1156/1
SRM:kjf:nwn
2007 - 2008 LEGISLATURE
February 15, 2007 - Introduced by Representatives Stone, Honadel, Vukmir,
Newcomer, Pridemore, M. Williams, Van Roy, Lothian, Kestell, Moulton,
Musser, Montgomery, Petersen, Suder, Tauchen, Murtha, Nygren, Roth, A.
Ott, Ballweg, Rhoades, Bies, Zipperer, Hines, Kerkman, Jeskewitz, Vos,
Huebsch, Kleefisch, J. Fitzgerald, Gundrum, Strachota, Meyer, Nass, J.
Ott, Mursau, Petrowski, Owens, Kaufert, F. Lasee, Kramer, Friske,
Gunderson, LeMahieu, Townsend, Gottlieb, Davis
and Wood, cosponsored by
Senators Leibham, S. Fitzgerald, Darling, Kanavas, Lazich, A. Lasee,
Grothman, Schultz
and Roessler. Referred to Committee on Elections and
Constitutional Law.
AJR17,1,3 1To create section 1m of article III of the constitution; relating to: requiring a
2photographic identification to vote, or register to vote, at the polls on election
3day (second consideration).
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau
Explanation of Proposal
This proposed constitutional amendment, to be given second consideration by
the 2007 legislature for submittal to the voters in November 2008, was first
considered by the
2005 legislature in 2005 Assembly Joint Resolution 36, which
became
2005 Enrolled Joint Resolution 39.
It provides a qualified elector may not vote, or register to vote, at the polls on
election day unless the elector presents a photographic identification issued by this
state or by the federal government. After the date of ratification, the legislature, by
law, with the concurrence of two-thirds of all the members present, may exempt any
class of electors from these requirements.
Procedure for Second ConsideratioN
When a proposed constitutional amendment is before the legislature on second
consideration, any change in the text approved by the preceding legislature causes
the proposed constitutional amendment to revert to first consideration status so that
second consideration approval would have to be given by the next legislature before
the proposal may be submitted to the people for ratification [see joint rule 57 (2)].
If the legislature approves a proposed constitutional amendment on second
consideration, it must also set the date for submitting the proposed constitutional

amendment to the people for ratification and must determine the question or
questions to appear on the ballot.
AJR17,2,41 Whereas, the 2005 legislature in regular session considered a proposed
2amendment to the constitution in 2005 Assembly Joint Resolution 36, which became
32005 Enrolled Joint Resolution 39, and agreed to it by a majority of the members
4elected to each of the 2 houses, which proposed amendment reads as follows:
AJR17, s. 1 5Section 1. Section 1m of article III of the constitution is created to
6read:
AJR17,2,107 [Article III] Section 1m (1) A qualified elector may not vote, or
8register to vote, at the polls on election day unless the elector presents a
9photographic identification issued by this state or by the federal
10government.
AJR17,2,1311 (2) After the date of ratification of this section, the legislature, by
12law, with the concurrence of two-thirds of all the members present, may
13exempt any class of electors from the requirements of subsection (1).
AJR17,2,21 14Now, therefore, be it resolved by the assembly, the senate concurring,
15That
the foregoing proposed amendment to the constitution is agreed to by the 2007
16legislature; and, be it further
17Resolved, That the foregoing proposed amendment to the constitution be
18submitted to a vote of the people at the election to be held on the Tuesday after the
19first Monday in November 2008; and, be it further
20Resolved, That the question concerning ratification of the foregoing proposed
21amendment to the constitution be stated on the ballot as follows:
AJR17,3,2 22Question 1: "Voting. Shall section 1m of article III of the constitution be
23created to provide that a qualified elector may not vote, or register to vote, at the polls
24on election day unless the elector presents a photographic identification issued by
25this state or by the federal government and after the date of ratification of this

1section, the legislature, by law, with the concurrence of two-thirds of all the members
2present, may exempt any class of electors from that requirement?"
AJR17,3,33 (End)
Loading...
Loading...