LRB-2068/4
GMM:wlj&kjf:pg
2007 - 2008 LEGISLATURE
February 12, 2008 - Introduced by Senators Lazich, Darling and Taylor,
cosponsored by Representatives Gunderson, Grigsby, Nass, Hahn, Townsend
and Strachota. Referred to Committee on Judiciary, Corrections, and
Housing.
SB476,1,10 1An Act to amend 48.355 (3) (a), 48.42 (1m) (d), 48.428 (6) (a) and 938.355 (3) (a);
2and to create 48.38 (4) (bv) and 938.38 (4) (bv) of the statutes; relating to: the
3effect of an order denying, limiting, discontinuing, or prohibiting parental
4visitation with a child who is adjudged to be in need of protection or services,
5who is the subject of a termination of parental rights petition, or who is in
6sustaining care following a termination of parental rights on visitation between
7the child and a sibling and requiring a child's permanency plan to include a
8statement as to whether visitation between the child and a sibling is in the best
9interests of the child and sibling when parental visitation is denied, limited,
10discontinued, or prohibited.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, the court assigned to exercise jurisdiction under the
Children's Code (juvenile court) may set reasonable rules of visitation for the parent
of a child adjudged to be in need of protection or services. Current law also permits
the juvenile court to issue a temporary order or injunction prohibiting a person whose
parental rights are sought to be terminated involuntarily from visiting or contacting

the child who is the subject of the termination of parental rights (TPR) petition. In
addition, current law permits the juvenile court to prohibit visitation by a birth
parent of a child who has been placed in sustaining care following a TPR.
This bill provides that a denial, limitation, or discontinuation of parental
visitation with a child adjudged to be in need of protection or services, a temporary
order or injunction prohibiting a person whose parental rights are sought to be
terminated from visiting or contacting the child who is the subject of the TPR
petition, or a prohibition on visitation by a birth parent of a child in sustaining care
following a TPR shall not affect visitation between the child and any sibling of the
child, including a person who was a sibling of the child before adoption of or TPR to
the person, which visitation shall be granted, denied, or continued based on the best
interests of the child and sibling, regardless of whether parental visitation is denied,
limited, discontinued, or prohibited.
The bill also requires an agency preparing a permanency plan for a child, which
is a plan designed to ensure that the child is reunified with his or her family
whenever appropriate or that the child quickly attains a placement or home
providing long-term stability, to include in the permanency plan a statement as to
whether visitation between the child and any sibling of the child, including a person
who was a sibling of the child before adoption of or TPR to the person, would be in
the best interests of the child and sibling when parental visitation has been denied,
limited, discontinued, or prohibited by the juvenile court or when the agency
recommends that parental visitation be denied, limited, discontinued, or prohibited.
For further information see the state and local fiscal estimate, which will be
printed as an appendix to this bill.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do
enact as follows:
SB476, s. 1 1Section 1. 48.355 (3) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:
SB476,2,92 48.355 (3) (a) Except as provided in par. (b), if, after a hearing on the issue with
3due notice to the parent or guardian, the court finds that it would be in the best
4interest of the child, the court may set reasonable rules of parental visitation. Any
5denial, limitation, or discontinuation of parental visitation under an order under s.
648.345, 48.363, or 48.365 shall not affect visitation between the child and any sibling,
7as defined in s. 48.38 (4) (br), of the child, which visitation shall be granted, denied,
8or continued based on the best interests of the child and sibling, without regard to
9whether parental visitation is denied, limited, or discontinued.
SB476, s. 2
1Section 2. 48.38 (4) (bv) of the statutes is created to read:
SB476,3,72 48.38 (4) (bv) If parental visitation has been denied, limited, or discontinued
3by an order under s. 48.345, 48.363, or 48.365 or prohibited by an order under s.
448.428 (6) (a) or if the agency recommends that parental visitation be denied, limited,
5discontinued, or prohibited, a statement as to whether visitation between the child
6and any sibling, as defined in par. (br), of the child would be in the best interests of
7the child and sibling.
SB476, s. 3 8Section 3. 48.42 (1m) (d) of the statutes is amended to read:
SB476,3,169 48.42 (1m) (d) A temporary order under par. (b) or an injunction under par. (c)
10suspends the portion of any order under s. 48.345, 48.363, 48.365, 938.345, 938.363
11or 938.365 setting rules of parental visitation until the termination of the temporary
12order under par. (b) or injunction under par. (c). A temporary order under par. (b) or
13injunction under par. (c) shall not affect visitation between the child and any sibling,
14as defined in s. 48.38 (4) (br), of the child, which visitation shall be granted, denied,
15or continued based on the best interests of the child and sibling, without regard to
16whether parental visitation is prohibited.
SB476, s. 4 17Section 4. 48.428 (6) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:
SB476,3,2318 48.428 (6) (a) Except as provided in par. (b), the court may order or prohibit
19visitation by a birth parent of a child placed in sustaining care. A prohibition on
20visitation by a birth parent under this paragraph shall not affect visitation between
21the child and any sibling, as defined in s. 48.38 (4) (br), of the child, which visitation
22shall be granted, denied, or continued based on the best interests of the child and
23sibling, without regard to whether parental visitation is prohibited.
SB476, s. 5 24Section 5. 938.355 (3) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:
SB476,4,9
1938.355 (3) (a) Except as provided in par. (b), if, after a hearing on the issue with
2due notice to the parent or guardian, the court finds that it would be in the best
3interest of the juvenile, the court may set reasonable rules of parental visitation. Any
4denial, limitation, or discontinuation of parental visitation under an order under s.
5938.34, 938.345, 938.363, or 938.365 shall not affect visitation between the juvenile
6and any sibling, as defined in s. 48.38 (4) (br), of the juvenile, which visitation shall
7be granted, denied, or continued based on the best interests of the juvenile and
8sibling, without regard to whether parental visitation is denied, limited, or
9discontinued.
SB476, s. 6 10Section 6. 938.38 (4) (bv) of the statutes is created to read:
SB476,4,1511 938.38 (4) (bv) If parental visitation has been denied, limited, or discontinued
12by an order under s. 938.345, 938.363, or 938.365 or if the agency recommends that
13parental visitation be denied, limited, or discontinued, a statement as to whether
14visitation between the juvenile and any sibling, as defined in par. (br), of the juvenile
15would be in the best interests of the juvenile and sibling.
SB476, s. 7 16Section 7. Initial applicability.
SB476,4,2117 (1) Denial of parental visitation; sibling visitation unaffected. The
18treatment of sections 48.355 (3) (a), 48.42 (1m) (d), 48.428 (6) (a), and 938.355 (3) (a)
19of the statutes first applies to a child whose parent is subject to an order denying,
20limiting, or prohibiting visitation with the child on the effective date of this
21subsection, regardless of the date of the order.
SB476,4,2422 (2) Denial of parental visitation; permanency plans. The treatment of sections
2348.38 (4) (bv) and 938.38 (4) (bv) of the statutes first applies to a permanency plan
24prepared on the effective date of this subsection.
SB476,4,2525 (End)
Loading...
Loading...