LRB-3174/1
GMM:kjf:ph
2011 - 2012 LEGISLATURE
March 15, 2012 - Introduced by Senator Lassa, cosponsored by Representatives
Barca and Turner. Referred to Committee on Senate Organization.
SB568,1,2 1An Act to create 227.28 of the statutes; relating to: periodic review of
2administrative rules.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, a state agency (agency) may promulgate administrative
rules (rules) to interpret the provisions of any statute enforced or administered by
the agency, if the agency considers it necessary to effectuate the purpose of the
statute.
This bill requires periodic review of rules. Specifically, the bill requires every
agency that has promulgated rules to determine which of those rules has been in
effect for ten years without being modified or revised. The bill, however, permits
agencies to make that determination with respect to a rule that is in effect on
January 1, 2013, which is the effective date of the bill, during a five-year grace period
beginning on that date. If an agency determines that a rule has been in effect for ten
years without being modified or revised, the agency must submit a report regarding
the rule to the Joint Committee for Review of Administrative Rules (JCRAR). The
report must include all of the following:
1. An analysis of the continued need for the rule; the nature and merits of any
complaints or comments received from the public regarding the rule; the complexity
of the rule; the extent to which the rule overlaps, duplicates, or conflicts with federal
regulations, other state rules, or local ordinances; and the degree to which
technology, economic conditions, or other factors have changed in the subject area
affected by the rule since the rule was promulgated or last modified or revised.
2. Recommendations to delete any obsolete provisions of the rule; to address
any meritorious complaints or comments received from the public regarding the rule;

to simplify any unnecessarily complex provisions of the rule; to eliminate any
overlap, duplication, or conflict of the rule with federal regulations, other state rules,
or local ordinances; and to modernize the rule in light of technological, economic, or
other changes in the subject area affected by the rule since the rule was promulgated
or last modified or revised.
JCRAR then must review the report using a 14-day passive review process.
Specifically, if the cochairpersons of JCRAR do not notify the head of the agency that
JCRAR has scheduled a meeting for the purpose of reviewing the report within 14
working days after receipt of the report, the rule identified in the report continues
in effect and the agency may proceed with rule making to revise the rule in
accordance with its recommendations. If, however, the cochairpersons of JCRAR
notify the head of the agency, within those 14 working days, that JCRAR has
scheduled a meeting for the purpose of reviewing the report, JCRAR may schedule
a meeting to review the report. At the conclusion of its review, JCRAR may do any
of the following:
1. Approve the rule in its current form, as modified by the agency's
recommendations, in which case the rule continues in effect and the agency may
proceed with rule making to revise the rule in accordance with those
recommendations.
2. Approve the rule in its current form, but object to the agency's
recommendations, in which case the rule continues in effect and the agency may
submit modified recommendations to JCRAR.
3. Object to the rule in its current form, but approve the agency's
recommendations, in which case JCRAR may suspend the rule and the agency may
proceed with rule making to revise the rule in accordance with those
recommendations.
4. Object to the rule in its current form and to the agency's recommendations,
in which case JCRAR may suspend the rule and the agency may submit modified
recommendations to JCRAR.
5. Refer the report to a standing committee in each house of the legislature, in
which case each standing committee to which the report is referred may approve or
object to the rule in its current form and the agency's recommendations and JCRAR
may concur or nonconcur in the actions of those standing committees or otherwise
approve or object to the rule and those recommendations.
For further information see the state fiscal estimate, which will be printed as
an appendix to this bill.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do
enact as follows:
SB568, s. 1 1Section 1. 227.28 of the statutes is created to read:
SB568,3,8 2227.28 Periodic review of rules. (1) Every agency that has promulgated
3rules shall determine which of those rules has been in effect for 10 years without

1being modified or revised. With respect to a rule that is in effect on January 1, 2013,
2an agency shall make that determination during the 5-year period beginning on that
3date. If an agency determines that a rule has been in effect for 10 years without being
4modified or revised, the agency shall submit a report regarding the rule to the joint
5committee for review of administrative rules. The report shall identify the rule,
6specify the date on which the rule was first promulgated and the date on which the
7rule was last modified or revised, and briefly describe the subject matter of the rule.
8The report shall also include all of the following:
SB568,3,149 (a) An analysis of the continued need for the rule; the nature and merits of any
10complaints or comments received from the public regarding the rule; the complexity
11of the rule; the extent to which the rule overlaps, duplicates, or conflicts with federal
12regulations, other state rules, or local ordinances; and the degree to which
13technology, economic conditions, or other factors have changed in the subject area
14affected by the rule since the rule was promulgated or last modified or revised.
SB568,3,2115 (b) Recommendations to delete any obsolete provisions of the rule; to address
16any meritorious complaints or comments received from the public regarding the rule;
17to simplify any unnecessarily complex provisions of the rule; to eliminate any
18overlap, duplication, or conflict of the rule with federal regulations, other state rules,
19or local ordinances; and to modernize the rule in light of technological, economic, or
20other changes in the subject area affected by the rule since the rule was promulgated
21or last modified or revised.
SB568,4,8 22(2) Upon receipt of a report under sub. (1), the cochairpersons of the joint
23committee for review of administrative rules shall notify, in writing, each committee
24member of receipt of the report. If the cochairpersons of the committee do not notify
25the head of the agency that the committee has scheduled a meeting for the purpose

1of reviewing the report within 14 working days after the date of receipt of the report,
2the rule identified in the report shall continue in effect and the agency may proceed
3with rule making under the procedures prescribed in this subchapter to revise the
4rule in accordance with the recommendations submitted under sub. (1) (b). If, within
514 working days after receipt of the report, the cochairpersons of the committee
6notify the head of the agency that the committee has scheduled a meeting for the
7purpose of reviewing the report, the committee may schedule a meeting to review the
8report.
SB568,4,14 9(3) In reviewing a report under sub. (1), the joint committee for review of
10administrative rules shall consider the analysis under sub. (1) (a), the
11recommendations under sub. (1) (b), and any other information included in the
12report. The committee may hold a public hearing to review the report and may
13request the agency to meet with the committee to review the report. At the
14conclusion of its review, the committee may do any of the following:
SB568,4,1815 1. Approve the rule in its current form, as modified by the recommendations
16submitted under sub. (1) (b), in which case the rule shall continue in effect and the
17agency may proceed with rule making under the procedures prescribed in this
18subchapter to revise the rule in accordance with those recommendations.
SB568,4,2119 2. Approve the rule in its current form, but object to the recommendations
20submitted under sub. (1) (b), in which case the rule shall continue in effect and the
21agency may submit modified recommendations to the committee.
SB568,5,222 3. Object to the rule in its current form, but approve the recommendations
23submitted under sub. (1) (b), in which case the committee may suspend the rule
24under s. 227.26 (2) and the agency may proceed with rule making under the

1procedures prescribed in this subchapter to revise the rule in accordance with those
2recommendations.
SB568,5,53 4. Object to the rule in its current form and to the recommendations submitted
4under sub. (1) (b), in which case the committee may suspend the rule under s. 227.26
5(2) and the agency may submit modified recommendations to the committee.
SB568,5,126 5. Refer the report to the presiding officer of each house of the legislature for
7referral to a standing committee as provided in s. 227.19 (2), in which case each
8standing committee to which the report is referred may approve or object to the rule
9in its current form and the recommendations submitted under sub. (1) (b) and the
10joint committee for review of administrative rules may concur or nonconcur in the
11actions of those standing committees or otherwise approve or object to the rule and
12those recommendations as provided in subds. 1. to 4.
SB568, s. 2 13Section 2. Effective date.
SB568,5,1414 (1) Periodic review of rules. This act takes effect on January 1, 2013.
SB568,5,1515 (End)
Loading...
Loading...