LRB-4095/1
CMH&ARG:med:rs
2011 - 2012 LEGISLATURE
March 15, 2012 - Introduced by Senators Lassa and Vinehout, cosponsored by
Representatives Jorgensen, Roys, Turner and Ringhand. Referred to
Committee on Senate Organization.
SB575,1,3 1An Act to amend 16.87 (2) (a); and to create 84.01 (13m) and 85.65 of the
2statutes; relating to: state contractual services and requiring the exercise of
3rule-making authority.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, if a state agency enters into or renews a contract for services
that involves an estimated expenditure of more than $25,000, the agency must, in
accordance with standards prescribed by the Department of Administration (DOA),
conduct either a uniform cost-benefit analysis, for a new contract, or a continued
appropriateness review, for a contract renewal. In addition, if the estimated cost
exceeds $50,000, DOA must generally invite bids or proposals to be submitted and
award the contract to the entity that submits the lowest bid or most advantageous
competitive proposal.
Current law exempts from the requirements certain contracts for engineering
services or architectural services done for the state if DOA approves the contract.
Under this bill, these services remain exempt from the requirements, but an
engineer or an architect at DOA must determine if the project could be completed
more effectively and efficiently with state employees before DOA may approve the
contract.
Current law also exempts from the requirements contracts with the
Department of Transportation (DOT). Instead, under current law, DOT must, in
accordance with standards prescribed by DOT, conduct a uniform cost-benefit
analysis, or continued appropriateness review, of each proposed engagement that

involves an estimated expenditure of more than $25,000. Under this bill, DOT must
submit a report, with respect to the previous fiscal year, to the governor and the
legislature on the following:
1. The number, value, and nature of contractual engagements of services
authorized by DOT.
2. A summary of the cost-benefit analyses completed.
3. Recommendations for elimination of unneeded contractual engagements of
services and for consolidation or resolicitation of existing contractual engagements
of services.
4. An identification of all contractors engaged, contract amount, duration, and
services to be provided, as well as aggregated value of contracts for each contractor,
distinguishing between initial contracts and extended or renewed contracts and
specifying the termination date of each contract.
5. A summary of DOT's contract review activities.
6. An identification of contract services by code according to the type of services.
7. An identification of any contracts awarded by other than usual and
customary contracting procedures, including any single-source contracts.
Then, under this bill, within 30 days of completion of a contract for
engagements of services that involves an expenditure of more than $50,000, DOT
must submit to the governor and the legislature a summary of the purpose of the
contract, including why it was necessary to enter into the contract; the amount spent
on the contract; if the contract was awarded by other than usual and customary
contracting procedures and, if it was a single-source contract, an explanation of why
there was only a single source for the services; and a performance evaluation of the
work done under the contract.
This bill also requires DOT to establish a methodology to determine the
percentage of work for which DOT has responsibility that DOT may outsource to
persons not employed by DOT and to set forth a process by which DOT could attain
staffing levels sufficiently proficient to ensure that not more than 50 percent of work
for which DOT has responsibility is outsourced to persons not employed by DOT.
Finally, under this bill, within six months of the enactment of this bill, DOT
must submit a report to the Joint Committee on Finance that contains
recommendations on actions that DOT and local governments can take to improve
the efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and timeliness of local road construction projects
and proposed legislative changes to help to implement those recommendations. In
addition, this bill requires DOT to submit to the legislature by February 1, 2013, a
report on the work for which DOT has responsibility and that DOT has, during the
previous three fiscal years, outsourced to persons not employed by DOT, including
any outsourced projects for which DOT has encumbered, expended, or otherwise
committed any funding. In this report, DOT must denote work that was committed
from funding provided under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.

For further information see the state and local fiscal estimate, which will be
printed as an appendix to this bill.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do
enact as follows:
SB575, s. 1 1Section 1. 16.87 (2) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:
SB575,3,102 16.87 (2) (a) A contract for engineering services or architectural services or a
3to be done for or furnished to the state or a department, board, commission, or officer
4of the state is exempt from the requirements of ss. 16.705 and 16.75, but an engineer
5or an architect employed at the department shall determine if the project could be
6completed more effectively and efficiently with state employees before a contract
7may be approved under sub. (3). A
contract involving an expenditure of $10,000 or
8more for construction work, or $30,000 or more for limited trades work, to be done
9for or furnished to the state or a department, board, commission, or officer of the state
10is exempt from the requirements of ss. 16.705 and 16.75.
SB575, s. 2 11Section 2. 84.01 (13m) of the statutes is created to read:
SB575,3,1912 84.01 (13m) Contractual engagements of services reporting. (a) On or
13before October 15 of each year, the department shall submit to the governor, the joint
14committee on finance, the joint legislative audit committee, and the chief clerk of
15each house of the legislature for distribution to the appropriate standing committees
16under s. 13.172 (3) a report concerning the number, value, and nature of contractual
17engagements of services authorized under sub. (13) during the preceding fiscal year.
18The report shall also include, with respect to contractual engagements of services for
19the preceding fiscal year, all of the following:
SB575,3,2120 1. A summary of the cost-benefit analyses completed in compliance with rules
21promulgated by the department.
SB575,4,3
12. Recommendations for elimination of unneeded contractual engagements of
2services and for consolidation or resolicitation of existing contractual engagements
3of services.
SB575,4,74 3. Identification of all contractors engaged, contract amount, duration, and
5services to be provided, as well as aggregated value of contracts for each contractor.
6The report shall distinguish between initial contracts and extended or renewed
7contracts and shall specify the termination date of each contract.
SB575,4,88 4. A summary of the department's contract review activities.
SB575,4,99 5. Identification of contract services by code according to the type of services.
SB575,4,1110 6. Identification of any contracts awarded by other than usual and customary
11contracting procedures, including any single source contracts.
SB575,4,1712 (b) Within 30 days of final completion of a contract for engagements of services
13authorized under sub. (13) that involves an expenditure of more than $50,000, the
14secretary shall submit to the governor, the joint committee on finance, the joint
15legislative audit committee, and the chief clerk of each house of the legislature for
16distribution to the appropriate standing committees under s. 13.172 (3) a one-page
17report that includes all of the following information:
SB575,4,1918 1. A summary of the purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary
19to enter into the contract.
SB575,4,2020 2. The amount spent on the contract.
SB575,4,2321 3. If the contract was awarded by other than usual and customary contracting
22procedures, including if it was a single-source contract, an explanation of why the
23department determined that there was only a single source for the services.
SB575,5,324 4. A written performance evaluation of the work done under the contract,
25including an appraisal of the contractor's timeliness, quality, cost, and overall

1performance in meeting the terms and objectives of the contract. Contractors may
2request copies of evaluations prepared under this subdivision and may respond in
3writing. The department shall maintain contractor responses with the contract file.
SB575, s. 3 4Section 3. 85.65 of the statutes is created to read:
SB575,5,11 585.65 Workload outsourcing rules. The department shall promulgate rules
6establishing a methodology to determine the percentage of work for which the
7department has responsibility that the department may outsource to persons not
8employed by the department. The rules shall set forth a process by which the
9department could attain staffing levels sufficiently proficient to ensure that not more
10than 50 percent of work for which the department has responsibility is outsourced
11to persons not employed by the department.
SB575, s. 4 12Section 4. Nonstatutory provisions.
SB575,5,1613 (1) Report on local road projects. No later than the first day of the 7th month
14beginning after the effective date of this subsection, the department of
15transportation shall submit a report to the joint committee on finance that contains
16all of the following:
SB575,5,1917 (a) Recommendations on actions that the department and local governments
18can take to improve the efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and timeliness of local road
19construction projects.
SB575,5,2120 (b) Any proposed legislative changes that the legislature can consider that may
21help to implement the recommendations under paragraph (a ).
SB575,6,622 (2) Report on workload outsourcing. No later than February 1, 2013, the
23department of transportation shall submit to the legislature under section 13.172 (2)
24of the statutes a report on the work for which the department of transportation has
25responsibility and that the department of transportation has, during the previous 3

1fiscal years, outsourced to persons not employed by the department of
2transportation. The report shall include any outsourced projects for which the
3department of transportation has encumbered, expended, or otherwise committed
4any funding. In this report, the department of transportation shall also denote work
5that was committed from funding provided under the American Recovery and
6Reinvestment Act of 2009.
SB575,6,127 (3) Rulemaking on workload outsourcing. The department of transportation
8shall begin promulgating the rules required under section 85.65 of the statutes, as
9created by this act, no later than February 1, 2013, and shall submit in proposed form
10the rules required under section 85.65 of the statutes, as created by this act, to the
11legislative council staff under section 227.15 (1) of the statutes no later than
12February 1, 2014.
SB575,6,1313 (End)
Loading...
Loading...