15. Correct the number of a subdivision.
16. Update wildlife rehabilitation code language so that it is consistent with proposed changes to the list of threatened and endangered species.
Related statute or rule
There are no state rules or statutes currently under promulgation that directly relate to the provisions that are proposed in this administrative order.
Comparison with federal regulations
These state rules and statutes do not relieve individuals from the restrictions, requirements and conditions of federal statutes and regulations. Regulating the hunting and trapping of native species has been delegated to state fish and wildlife agencies. Additionally, none of the proposed rules exceed the authorities granted to states in
50 CFR part 10.
Comparison with rules in adjacent states
These rule change proposals do not represent significant policy changes and do not differ significantly from surrounding states. All surrounding states have regulations and rules in place for the management and recreational use of wild game and furbearer species that are established based on needs that are unique to that state's resources and public desires.
Summary of factual data and analytical methodologies
This rule order is necessary to correct inconsistencies created through the promulgation of other rules and statutes, update code language, correct previous drafting errors, and to clarify existing administrative code language. The rule changes included in this order do not deviate from current department policy on the management of wildlife and the regulation of hunting and trapping.
Analysis and supporting documentation used to determine effect on small businesses
These rules are applicable to individual sportspersons and impose no compliance or reporting requirements for small businesses, and no design or operational standards are contained in the rule.
Small Business Impact
Pursuant to s.
227.114, Stats., it is not anticipated that the proposed rules will have a significant economic impact on small businesses.
Environmental Analysis
The Department has made a preliminary determination that this action does not involve significant adverse environmental effects and does not need an environmental analysis under ch.
NR 150, Wis. Adm. Code. However, based on the comments received, the Department may prepare an environmental analysis before proceeding with the proposal. This environmental review document would summarize the Department's consideration of the impacts of the proposal and reasonable alternatives.
Fiscal Estimate
Summary
The intent of these rule changes is to correct drafting errors, provide clarification to existing rules, simplify regulations, and update administrative code language and references. The department anticipates no fiscal effect from these proposed rule changes.
State fiscal effect
None.
Local government fiscal effect
None.
Long-range fiscal implications
No long-range fiscal implications are anticipated.
Notice of Hearing
Natural Resources
Environmental Protection — Air Pollution Control,
Chs.
NR 400—
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN That pursuant to ss.
227.16 and
227.17, Stats, the Department of Natural Resources, hereinafter the DNR, will hold a public hearing on proposed revisions to Chapters
NR 404,
438, and
484, relating to ambient air quality standards for ozone and lead and new reporting requirements for lead compounds on the date and at the time and location listed below.
The proposed revisions relate to issues for State Implementation Plan approvability, and the State Implementation Plan developed under s.
285.11 (6), Stats., will be revised.
Hearing Information
Date: December 1, 2009 (Tuesday)
Time: 1:00 p.m.
Location: DNR Southeast Region Headquarters
Room 140-141
2300 N. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Dr.
Milwaukee, WI
Reasonable accommodations, including the provision of informational material in an alternative format, will be provided for qualified individuals with disabilities upon request. Contact Robert Eckdale in writing at the DNR, Bureau of Air Management, P.O. Box 7921, Madison, WI 53707; by E-mail to
Robert.Eckdale@wisconsin.gov ; or by calling (608) 266-2856. A request must include specific information and be received at least 10 days before the date of the scheduled hearing.
Copies of Proposed Rule
The proposed rule and supporting documents, including the fiscal estimate, may be viewed and downloaded from the
Administrative Rules System Web site which can be accessed through the link provided on the Proposed Air Pollution Control Rules Calendar at
http://www.dnr.state.wi.us/air/ rules/calendar.htm . If you do not have Internet access, a copy of the proposed rule and supporting documents, including the fiscal estimate, may be obtained free of charge by contacting Robert B. Eckdale, Bureau of Air Management Rules Coordinator, by e-mail at
robert.eckdale@wisconsin.gov or by calling (608) 266-2856.
Submission of Written Comments
Comments on the proposed rule must be received on or before Monday, December 14, 2009. Written comments may be submitted by mail, fax, E-mail, or through the Internet and will have the same weight and effect as oral statements presented at the public hearing. Written comments and any questions on the proposed rules should be submitted to:
Larry Bruss
Department of Natural Resources
Bureau of Air Management (AM/7)
101 S. Webster Street
Madison, WI 53703
Phone: (608) 267-7543
Fax: (608) 267-0560
Internet: Use the Adm. Rules System Web site accessible
through the link provided on the Proposed Air
Pollution Control Rules Calendar at
Analysis Prepared by Department of Natural Resources
Statute interpreted
Statutory authority
Explanation of agency authority
The Department is required under s.
285.21 (1) (a), Stats., to promulgate by rule ambient air standards similar to, but not more restrictive than the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). The Department is also authorized under s.
285.11 (1) and
(6), Stats., to promulgate rules and establish control strategies in order to prepare and implement the State Implementation Plan for the prevention, abatement and control of air pollution in the state.
Related statute or rule
There are no related statutes that are not identified above.
Plain language analysis
Chapter
NR 404, Wis. Adm. Code, contains ambient air standards which are intended to be the same as the federal NAAQS promulgated by EPA, as is required under s.
285.21(1)(a), Stats. Chapter
NR 438, Wis. Adm. Code, establishes requirements for submission of reports for owners or operators of air contaminant sources related to the ambient air standards that are employed by the Department. The Clean Air Act requires EPA to review the latest scientific information every five years and promulgate NAAQS which are designated to protect public and public welfare. In 2008, EPA strengthened the 8-hour ozone NAAQS to 0.075 ppm and revised the NAAQS for lead from 1.5 micrograms/cubic meter (
mg/m
3) to 0.15
mg/m
3.
The Department is proposing to amend chs.
NR 404 and
438, Wis. Adm. Code
, to maintain consistency with the federal NAAQS. Specifically, the proposed rule revisions would: A) adopt the ozone and lead NAAQS into ch.
NR 404, Wis. Adm. Code; and B) incorporate the corresponding lead reporting requirements into ch.
NR 438, Wis. Adm. Code.
Comparison with federal regulations
The federally-enforced NAAQS are contained in Title 40, Part 50 of the Code of Federal Regulations (
40 CFR Part 50). The purpose of these proposed rules is to make the State-enforced ambient air standards for ozone and lead in ch.
NR 404, Wis. Adm. Code, consistent with the corresponding federal NAAQS, as required under s.
285.21(a), Stats.
Comparison with rules in adjacent states
These proposed rule revisions are designed to make Wisconsin's ambient air quality standards consistent with federal NAAQS, which are effective and enforced throughout the United States. Consequently, these proposed rules would be identical to the ambient air standard regulations in effect in the adjacent states.
Summary of factual data and analytical methodologies
The EPA, through its Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee has conducted exhaustive reviews and assessments on the health science of air pollution impacts to human health and welfare. This research has yielded NAAQS that are based upon sound health science designed to protect public health and welfare. The Department is accepting this extensive federal research as this order's factual data and analytical methodologies. Information on the federal rule changes are obtained from the federal registers published on March 27, 2008 (Vol. 73, No. 60) for ozone and on November 12, 2008 (Vol. 73, No. 219) for lead.
Analysis and supporting documents used to determine effect on small business
In light of the statutory requirement to promulgate by rule new ambient air quality standards similar to but not more restrictive than the federal standards, the Department relies on the federal data and the analytical methodologies EPA used to develop and promulgate the national ambient air quality standards. EPA analysis establishes that NAAQS do not have significant impacts upon small entities, including small businesses because NAAQS themselves impose no regulations upon small entities. Information on the analysis and supporting documents used to determine effect on small entities are contained in the EPA's Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0225 for the ozone NAAQS and RIA docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0735 for the lead NAAQS.
An economic impact report has not been requested.
Small Business Impact
The promulgation of the ozone and lead ambient air quality standards would not have any direct effect on businesses, including those defined as small business. Following the promulgation of the ozone and lead air quality standards, the EPA will determine if any areas in the state should be designated as nonattainment for either of the new air quality standards. The Department is required to develop an air quality management state implementation plan (SIP) to ensure that all ambient air quality standards are attained and maintained in all areas of the state. The future development of that SIP to address ozone and lead may result in emission limitations being developed for specific source categories or implementing emission control technologies which may affect businesses, including small businesses. Any prospective SIP revisions would occur through the development of additional rules, which would include analyses of the rules' potential effects on the private sector, including small businesses.
Environmental Analysis
The DNR has made a preliminary determination that adoption of the proposed rules would not involve significant adverse environmental effects and would not need an environmental analysis under ch.
NR 150, Wis. Adm. Code. However, based on the comments received, the DNR may prepare an environmental analysis before proceeding. This analysis would summarize the DNR's consideration of the impacts of the proposal and any reasonable alternatives.
Fiscal Estimate
Summary
The proposed rules will not have any direct economic impact on the private sector. If, in the future, EPA were to designate any areas in the state as non-attainment areas for either of the proposed ambient air quality standards, it could become necessary to develop rules to control emissions of ozone precursors or lead. If such rules become necessary, any potential economic impact to the private sector will be evaluated at that time.
State fiscal effect
None.
Local government fiscal effect
None.
Notice of Hearing
Pharmacy Examining Board
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to authority vested in the Pharmacy Examining Board in ss.
15.08 (5) (b),
227.11 (2) and
450.02 (3) (a),
(b),
(d) and
(e), Stats., the Pharmacy Examining Board will hold a public hearing at the time and place indicated below to consider an order to amend sections
Phar 6.08,
7.12 (2) (f) and
8.12 (2) (b), relating to security systems, utilization reviews, and prescription orders transmitted by facsimile.
Hearing Information
Date: December 2, 2009
