Read a third time.
The question was: Concurrence of Assembly Bill 2?
The ayes and noes were required and the vote was: ayes, 27; noes, 5; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Agard, Ballweg, Bernier, Bewley, Bradley, Darling, Erpenbach, Felzkowski, Feyen, Jacque, Johnson, Kapenga, Kooyenga, LeMahieu, Marklein, Petrowski, Pfaff, Ringhand, Roth, Roys, Smith, Stafsholt, L. Taylor, Testin, Wanggaard, Wimberger and Wirch - 27.
Noes - Senators Carpenter, Cowles, Larson, Nass and Stroebel - 5.
Absent or not voting – None - 0.
Concurred in.
hist127695Senator LeMahieu, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate Bill 2 be laid on the table. Senator LeMahieu, with unanimous consent, asked that all action be immediately messaged to the Assembly:
Messaged.
Senate Bill 1
Relating to: modifications to the tax treatment of tax-option corporations that elect to pay tax at the entity level.
hist127692Senator LeMahieu, with unanimous consent, asked that Assembly Bill 3 be withdrawn from the committee on Senate Organization and taken up at this time. Assembly Bill 3
Relating to: modifications to the tax treatment of tax-option corporations that elect to pay tax at the entity level.
hist127699Senator LeMahieu, with unanimous consent, asked that the rules be suspended and the bill be given its third reading. Read a third time.
The question was: Concurrence of Assembly Bill 3?
The ayes and noes were required and the vote was: ayes, 32; noes, 0; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Agard, Ballweg, Bernier, Bewley, Bradley, Carpenter, Cowles, Darling, Erpenbach, Felzkowski, Feyen, Jacque, Johnson, Kapenga, Kooyenga, Larson, LeMahieu, Marklein, Nass, Petrowski, Pfaff, Ringhand, Roth, Roys, Smith, Stafsholt, Stroebel, L. Taylor, Testin, Wanggaard, Wimberger and Wirch - 32.
Noes – None - 0.
Absent or not voting – None - 0.
Concurred in.