SB107,7,12 4. An assessment of the potential impact of the system on civil liberties and civil rights and any plans to safeguard those public rights.

SB107,7,14 5. The fiscal costs of a system, including establishment costs, ongoing costs, and program funding.

SB107,7,15 (e) A municipality shall develop uniform guidelines for all of the following:

SB107,7,16 1. The screening and issuing of citations under this section.

SB107,7,18 2. The processing and storage of confidential information under this section and procedures to ensure compliance with confidentiality requirements.

SB107,8,5 (f) A contract between a municipality and a manufacturer or supplier of an automated speed enforcement system shall allow the municipality to purchase materials, lease equipment, and contract for processing services from the manufacturer or supplier based on the services rendered on a monthly schedule or another schedule agreed upon by the municipality and contractor. The contract may not include provisions for payment or compensation based on the number of citations issued under this section, or as a percentage of revenue generated, from the use of the system. The contract shall include a provision that all data collected from a system is confidential, and shall prohibit the manufacturer or supplier of a system from sharing, repurposing, or monetizing collected data. The local law enforcement agency shall oversee and maintain control over all enforcement activities, including the determination of when a citation should be issued.

SB107,8,10 (g) Two years after implementation of an automated speed enforcement program and 5 years after the effective date of this paragraph .... [LRB inserts date], a municipality shall prepare and submit to the standing committees of the legislature with jurisdiction over transportation matters a system report that includes all of the following information:

SB107,8,11 1. A description of how systems were used.

SB107,8,14 2. Whether and how often system data was shared with outside entities, the name of any recipient entity, the type of data disclosed, and the legal reason for the disclosure.

SB107,8,16 3. A summary of any community complaints or concerns about the use of systems.

SB107,8,18 4. Results of any internal audits, information about any violations of the system use policy, and any actions taken in response.

SB107,8,20 5. Information regarding the impact that the use of systems has had on the highways where the systems were deployed.

SB107,8,21 6. A summary of any public records requests related to systems.

SB107,9,4 (h) Not later than March 1 of the 5th year beginning after the effective date of this paragraph .... [LRB inserts date], a municipality shall prepare and submit to the standing committees of the legislature with jurisdiction over transportation matters an evaluation of the use of automated speed enforcement systems in its jurisdiction, including an assessment of the system's impact on highway safety and the system's economic impact on the communities where the system is used. The report shall be made available on the website of the local law enforcement agency and shall include all of the following information:

SB107,9,9 1. Before and after data on the number and proportion of vehicles speeding between 10 to 19 miles per hour over the legal speed limit, 20 to 29 miles per hour over the legal speed limit, 30 to 39 miles per hour over the legal speed limit, and every additional 10 miles per hour increment thereafter on a highway on which a system is used to enforce speed limits.

SB107,9,12 2. The number of citations issued under this section by month and year and the corridors or locations where violations occurred and, to the extent feasible, the day of the week and time the violation occurred.

SB107,9,15 3. Before and after data on the number of traffic collisions, categorized by injury severity, that occurred where systems are used relative to jurisdiction-wide data and the mode of transportation of the parties involved.

SB107,9,16 4. The number of citations paid and citations dismissed.

SB107,9,18 5. The costs associated with implementation and operation of the systems, and revenues collected by each jurisdiction.

SB107,9,21 6. The uses of revenues collected by use of systems in the jurisdiction, including information on roadway traffic safety projects, traffic safety education, and law enforcement activities and programs that were implemented.

SB107,9,23 7. Before and after data on the number of law enforcement officers, including the number of officers dedicated to traffic enforcement.

SB107,10,3 8. An evaluation of whether use of systems has resulted in traffic impacts on highways that may be susceptible to traffic diversion, in the vicinity of corridors with installed systems.

SB107,10,5 9. The results of surveys and outreach to low-income and predominantly minority communities where systems were deployed.

SB107,10,7 (7) A visual image made by an automated speed enforcement system is not subject to the right of inspection and copying under s. 19.35 (1).

SB107,10,8 (8) This section applies only in a 1st class city.

SB107,10,10 (9) This section does not apply 5 years after the effective date of this subsection .... [LRB inserts date].

SB107,4 Section 4 . 346.60 (6) of the statutes is created to read:

SB107,10,19 346.60 (6) A vehicle owner found liable under s. 346.575 is subject to a forfeiture in the same amount that may be imposed on a vehicle operator for the corresponding violation of s. 346.57 including, if applicable, the doubling of the forfeiture as provided in sub. (3m) (a). For purposes of this subsection, a person's prior violation of s. 346.57 may be counted as a prior violation of s. 346.575. Imposition of liability under s. 346.575 shall not result in suspension or revocation of a person's operating privilege under s. 343.30 or 343.31, nor shall it result in demerit points being recorded on a person's driving record under s. 343.32 (2) (a).

SB107,5 Section 5 . 349.107 of the statutes is created to read: