281.343(4d)(c)(c) No party may approve a proposal if the party determines that the proposal is inconsistent with this compact or the standard of review and decision or any implementing rules or regulations promulgated thereunder. The party may approve, approve with modifications, or disapprove any proposal depending on the proposal’s consistency with this compact and the standard of review and decision. 281.343(4d)(d)(d) Each party shall monitor the implementation of any approved proposal to ensure consistency with the approval and may take all necessary enforcement actions. 281.343(4d)(e)(e) No party shall approve a proposal subject to council or regional review, or both, pursuant to this compact unless it shall have been first submitted to and reviewed by either the council or regional body, or both, and approved by the council, as applicable. Sufficient opportunity shall be provided for comment on the proposal’s consistency with this compact and the standard of review and decision. All such comments shall become part of the party’s formal record of decision, and the party shall take into consideration any such comments received. 281.343(4f)(4f) Water management and regulation; requirement for originating party approval. No proposal subject to management and regulation under this compact shall hereafter be undertaken by any person unless it shall have been approved by the originating party. 281.343(4h)(4h) Water management and regulation; regional review. 281.343(4h)(a)1.1. It is the intention of the parties to participate in regional review of proposals with the provinces, as described in this compact and the agreement. 281.343(4h)(a)2.2. Unless the applicant or the originating party otherwise requests, it shall be the goal of the regional body to conclude its review no later than 90 days after notice under par. (b) of such proposal is received from the originating party. 281.343(4h)(a)3.3. Proposals for exceptions subject to regional review shall be submitted by the originating party to the regional body for regional review and, where applicable, to the council for concurrent review. 281.343(4h)(a)4.4. The parties agree that the protection of the integrity of the Great Lakes — St. Lawrence River Basin ecosystem shall be the overarching principle for reviewing proposals subject to regional review, recognizing uncertainties with respect to demands that may be placed on basin water, including groundwater, levels and flows of the Great Lakes and the St. Lawrence River, future changes in environmental conditions, the reliability of existing data, and the extent to which diversions may harm the integrity of the basin ecosystem. 281.343(4h)(a)5.5. The originating party shall have lead responsibility for coordinating information for resolution of issues related to evaluation of a proposal and shall consult with the applicant throughout the regional review process. 281.343(4h)(a)6.6. A majority of the members of the regional body may request regional review of a regionally significant or potentially precedent setting proposal. Such regional review must be conducted, to the extent possible, within the time frames set forth in this subsection. Any such regional review shall be undertaken only after consulting the applicant. 281.343(4h)(b)1.1. The originating party shall determine if a proposal is subject to regional review. If so, the originating party shall provide timely notice to the regional body and the public. 281.343(4h)(b)2.2. Such notice shall not be given unless and until all information, documents, and the originating party’s technical review needed to evaluate whether the proposal meets the standard of review and decision have been provided. 281.343(4h)(b)3.a.a. Provide notice to the regional body of an application, even if notification is not required; or 281.343(4h)(b)3.b.b. Request regional review of an application, even if regional review is not required. Any such regional review shall be undertaken only after consulting the applicant. 281.343(4h)(b)4.4. An originating party may provide preliminary notice of a potential proposal. 281.343(4h)(c)1.1. To ensure adequate public participation, the regional body shall adopt procedures for the review of proposals that are subject to regional review in accordance with subs. (4) to (4z). 281.343(4h)(c)2.2. The regional body shall provide notice to the public of a proposal undergoing regional review. Such notice shall indicate that the public has an opportunity to comment in writing to the regional body on whether the proposal meets the standard of review and decision. 281.343(4h)(c)3.3. The regional body shall hold a public meeting in the state or province of the originating party in order to receive public comment on the issue of whether the proposal under consideration meets the standard of review and decision. 281.343(4h)(c)4.4. The regional body shall consider the comments received before issuing a declaration of finding. 281.343(4h)(c)5.5. The regional body shall forward the comments it receives to the originating party. 281.343(4h)(d)1.1. The originating party shall provide the regional body with its technical review of the proposal under consideration. 281.343(4h)(d)2.2. The originating party’s technical review shall thoroughly analyze the proposal and provide an evaluation of the proposal sufficient for a determination of whether the proposal meets the standard of review and decision. 281.343(4h)(d)3.3. Any member of the regional body may conduct the member’s own technical review of any proposal subject to regional review.