Ayes - Senators Bernier, Bradley, Cowles, Darling, Felzkowski, Feyen, Jacque, Jagler, Kapenga, Kooyenga, LeMahieu, Marklein, Nass, Petrowski, Roth, Stafsholt, Stroebel, Testin, Wanggaard and Wimberger - 20.

Noes - Senators Agard, Bewley, Carpenter, Johnson, Larson, Pfaff, Ringhand, Roys, Smith, L. Taylor and Wirch - 11.

Absent or not voting - Senators Ballweg and Erpenbach - 2.

Concurred in.

Senator Erpenbach, with unanimous consent, asked to be recorded as voting “No” on the question of concurrence in Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 to Senate Joint Resolution 84.

Senate Bill 213

Relating to: actions for violations of elections laws.

hist156021 Senator LeMahieu raised the point of order that Senate Amendment 1 to Assembly Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 213 was not germane, pursuant to Senate Rule 50 (6)(b)4.

Senator Kapenga, with unanimous consent, asked that the Senate stand informal.

The Chair ruled the point of order well taken.

hist156089 Senator Larson appealed the ruling of the Chair.

The question was: Shall the Decision of the Chair stand as the judgment of the Senate?

The ayes and noes were required and the vote was: ayes, 20; noes, 11; absent or not voting, 2; as follows:

Ayes - Senators Bernier, Bradley, Cowles, Darling, Felzkowski, Feyen, Jacque, Jagler, Kapenga, Kooyenga, LeMahieu, Marklein, Nass, Petrowski, Roth, Stafsholt, Stroebel, Testin, Wanggaard and Wimberger - 20.

Noes - Senators Agard, Bewley, Carpenter, Johnson, Larson, Pfaff, Ringhand, Roys, Smith, L. Taylor and Wirch - 11.

Absent or not voting - Senators Ballweg and Erpenbach - 2.

The Decision of the Chair stands as the judgment of the Senate.

Senator Erpenbach, with unanimous consent, asked to be recorded as voting “No” on the question of shall the decision of the chair stand as the judgment of the Senate.

hist156090 The question was: Concurrence in Assembly Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 213?

Concurred in.

Senate Bill 259

Relating to: the regulation and licensure of genetic counselors, creating a genetic counselors affiliated credentialing board, providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures, granting rule-making authority, and providing a penalty.

hist156091 The question was: Concurrence in Assembly Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 259?

Concurred in.

Senate Bill 392

Relating to: certification of expanded function dental auxiliaries, extending the time limit for emergency rule procedures, providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures, and granting rule-making authority.

hist156092 The question was: Concurrence in Assembly Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 392?

Concurred in.

Senate Bill 394