66.0420(8)(c)3.3. Developments and buildings that are not accessible using reasonable technical solutions under commercially reasonable terms and conditions. 66.0420(8)(c)5.5. Other factors beyond the control of the video service provider. 66.0420(8)(d)(d) Alternative technologies. A video service provider may satisfy the requirements of this subsection through the use of an alternative technology, other than satellite service, that does all of the following: 66.0420(8)(d)1.1. Offers service, functionality, and content demonstrably similar to the service, functionality, and content provided through the video service provider’s video service network. 66.0420(8)(d)2.2. Provides access to PEG channels and messages broadcast over the emergency alert system. 66.0420(8)(e)(e) Limitations. Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, a telecommunications video service provider is not required to provide video service outside the provider’s basic local exchange service area, and a video service provider that is an incumbent cable operator is not required to provide video service outside the area in which the incumbent cable operator provided cable service at the time the department of financial institutions issued a video service franchise to the incumbent cable operator. 66.0420(9)(a)(a) Except as provided in par. (b), upon 90 days’ advance notice, a municipality may require a video service provider to comply with the customer service standards specified in 47 CFR 76.309 (c) in its provision of video service. Neither the department nor any municipality shall have the authority to impose additional or different customer service standards that are specific to the provision of video service. 66.0420(9)(b)(b) Except as provided in s. 100.209, no video service provider that provides video service in a municipality may be subject to any customer service standards if there is at least one other person offering cable or video service in the municipality or if the video service provider is subject to effective competition, as determined under 47 CFR 76.905, in the municipality. This paragraph does not apply to any customer service standards promulgated by rule by the department of agriculture, trade and consumer protection. 66.0420(9m)(a)(a) In this subsection, a “noncable video service provider” means a video service provider that is not a cable operator. 66.0420(9m)(b)(b) If a local broadcast station is authorized to exercise against a cable operator the right to require mandatory carriage under 47 USC 534, or the right to grant or withhold retransmission consent under 47 USC 325 (b), the local broadcast station may exercise the same right against a noncable video service provider to the same extent as the local broadcast station may exercise such right against a cable operator under federal law. 66.0420(9m)(c)(c) A noncable video service provider shall transmit, without degradation, the signals that a local broadcast station delivers to the noncable video service provider, but is not required to utilize the same or similar reception technology as the local broadcast station or the programming providers of the local broadcast station. 66.0420(9m)(d)(d) A noncable video service provider may not do any of the following: 66.0420(9m)(d)1.1. Discriminate among or between local broadcast stations, or programming providers of local broadcast stations, with respect to the transmission of their signals. 66.0420(9m)(d)2.2. Delete, change, or alter a copyright identification transmitted as part of a local broadcast station’s signal. 66.0420(10)(10) Limitation on rate regulation. The department or a municipality may not regulate the rates charged for any video service by an interim cable operator or video service provider that provides video service in a municipality if at least one other interim cable operator or video service provider is providing video service in the municipality and the other interim cable operator or video service provider is not an affiliate of the interim cable operator or video service provider. This subsection applies regardless of whether any affected interim cable operator or video service provider has sought a determination from the FCC regarding effective competition under 47 CFR 76.905. 66.0420(11)(11) Transfer of video service franchise. A person who is issued a video service franchise may transfer the video service franchise to any successor-in-interest, including a successor-in-interest that arises through merger, sale, assignment, restructuring, change of control, or any other transaction. No later than 15 days after the transfer is complete, the successor-in-interest shall apply for a video service franchise under sub. (3) (d) and comply with sub. (3) (e) 1. The successor-in-interest may provide video service in the video franchise area during the period that the department reviews the application. 66.0420(12)(a)(a) Except for costs for any of the following, a municipality that owns and operates a cable system, or an entity owned or operated, in whole or in part, by such a municipality, may not require nonsubscribers of the cable system to pay any of the costs of the cable system: 66.0420(12)(a)2.2. Debt service on bonds issued under s. 66.0619 to finance the construction, renovation, or expansion of a cable system. 66.0420(12)(am)(am) Paragraph (a) does not apply to a municipality that, on March 1, 2004, was providing cable service to the public. 66.0420(12)(b)(b) Paragraph (a) does not apply to a municipality if all of the following conditions apply: 66.0420(12)(b)1.1. On November 1, 2003, the public service commission has determined that the municipality is an alternative telecommunications utility under s. 196.203. 66.0420(12)(b)2.2. A majority of the governing board of the municipality votes to submit the question of supporting the operation of a cable system by the municipality to the electors in an advisory referendum and a majority of the voters in the municipality voting at the advisory referendum vote to support the operation of a cable system by the municipality.