NR 666.103(2)(b)1. 1. General facility information:

NR 666.103(2)(b)1.a. a. EPA facility ID number.

NR 666.103(2)(b)1.b. b. Facility name, contact person, telephone number and address.

NR 666.103(2)(b)1.c. c. Description of boilers and industrial furnaces burning hazardous waste, including type and capacity of device.

NR 666.103(2)(b)1.d. d. A scaled plot plan showing the entire facility and location of the boilers and industrial furnaces burning hazardous waste.

NR 666.103(2)(b)1.e. e. A description of the air pollution control system on each device burning hazardous waste, including the temperature of the flue gas at the inlet to the particulate matter control system.

NR 666.103(2)(b)2. 2. Except for facilities complying with the Tier I or adjusted Tier I feed rate screening limits for metals or total chlorine and chloride provided by ss. NR 666.106 (2) or (5) and 666.107 (2) (a) or (5), respectively, the estimated uncontrolled (at the inlet to the air pollution control system) emissions of particulate matter, each metal controlled by s. NR 666.106, and hydrogen chloride and chlorine, and all of the following information to support such determinations:

NR 666.103(2)(b)2.a. a. The feed rate (lb/hr) of ash, chlorine, antimony, arsenic, barium, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, silver and thallium in each feedstream (hazardous waste, other fuels, industrial furnace feedstocks).

NR 666.103(2)(b)2.b. b. The estimated partitioning factor to the combustion gas for the materials identified in subd. 2. a. and the basis for the estimate and an estimate of the partitioning to HCl and Cl2 of total chloride and chlorine in feed materials. To estimate the partitioning factor, the owner or operator shall use either best engineering judgment or the procedures specified in ch. NR 666 Appendix IX.

NR 666.103(2)(b)2.c. c. For industrial furnaces that recycle collected particulate matter (PM) back into the furnace and that will certify compliance with the metals emissions standards under sub. (3) (c) 2. a., the estimated enrichment factor for each metal. To estimate the enrichment factor, the owner or operator shall use either best engineering judgment or the procedures specified in “Alternative Methodology for Implementing Metals Controls” in ch. NR 666 Appendix IX.

NR 666.103(2)(b)2.d. d. If best engineering judgment is used to estimate partitioning factors or enrichment factors under subd. 2. b. or c. respectively, the basis for the judgment. When best engineering judgment is used to develop or evaluate data or information and make determinations under this section, the determinations shall be made by a qualified, registered professional engineer and a certification of the engineer’s determinations in accordance with s. NR 670.011 (4) shall be provided in the certification of precompliance.

NR 666.103(2)(b)3. 3. For facilities complying with the Tier I or adjusted Tier I feed rate screening limits for metals or total chlorine and chloride provided by ss. NR 666.106 (2) or (5) and 666.107 (2) (a) or (5), the feed rate (lb/hr) of total chloride and chlorine, antimony, arsenic, barium, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, silver and thallium in each feed stream (hazardous waste, other fuels, industrial furnace feedstocks).

NR 666.103(2)(b)4. 4. For facilities complying with the Tier II or Tier III emission limits for metals or HCl and Cl2 (under ss. NR 666.106 (3) or (4) or 666.107 (2) (b) or (3)), the estimated controlled (outlet of the air pollution control system) emissions rates of particulate matter, each metal controlled by s. NR 666.106, and HCl and Cl2, and the following information to support such determinations:

NR 666.103(2)(b)4.a. a. The estimated air pollution control system (APCS) removal efficiency for particulate matter, HCl, Cl2, antimony, arsenic, barium, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, silver and thallium.

NR 666.103(2)(b)4.b. b. To estimate APCS removal efficiency, the owner or operator shall use either best engineering judgment or the procedures prescribed in ch. NR 666 Appendix IX.

NR 666.103(2)(b)4.c. c. If best engineering judgment is used to estimate APCS removal efficiency, the basis for the judgment. Use of best engineering judgment shall be in conformance with provisions of subd. 2. d.

NR 666.103(2)(b)5. 5. Determination of allowable emissions rates for HCl, Cl2, antimony, arsenic, barium, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, silver and thallium, and the following information to support such determinations:

NR 666.103(2)(b)5.a. a. For all facilities, all of the following:

1) Physical stack height.

2) Good engineering practice stack height as defined by 40 CFR 51.100(ii).

3) Maximum flue gas flow rate.

4) Maximum flue gas temperature.

5) Attach a US geological service topographic map (or equivalent) showing the facility location and surrounding land within 5 km of the facility.

6) Identify terrain type: complex or noncomplex.

7) Identify land use: urban or rural.

NR 666.103(2)(b)5.b. b. For owners and operators using Tier III site specific dispersion modeling to determine allowable levels under s. NR 666.106 (4) or 666.107 (3), or adjusted Tier I feed rate screening limits under s. NR 666.106 (5) or 666.107 (5):

1) Dispersion model and version used.

2) Source of meterological data.

3) The dilution factor in micrograms per cubic meter per gram per second of emissions for the maximum annual average off-site (unless on-site is required) ground level concentration (MEI location).