(c) In consideration for paying the fee, the department may use work product 14
contained in an unsuccessful proposal in connection with any proposed or awarded 15
design-build project without making any additional compensation to the 16
design-builder. If an unsuccessful design-builder waives the stipulated fee, the 17
department may not use work product in the design-builder's unsuccessful proposal.
The department may promulgate rules necessary to implement 19
(a) Any person aggrieved and directly affected by a decision of 21
the office to issue a request for qualifications or a request for proposals under this 22
section shall be entitled to judicial review of the decision as provided in chapter 227, 23
subject to the procedural requirements of s. 227.53 (1). A person shall be considered 24
a person aggrieved and directly affected by a decision of the office if any of the
following apply to a request for qualifications or a request for proposals issued by the 2
office under this section:
1. The request does not include qualifications, requirements, or other items 4
required under this section.
2. The request does not comply with procedural requirements under this 6
3. The request contains material errors or omissions.
4. The request contains material discrepancies, deficiencies, or ambiguities 9
that prevent a person from submitting a responsive proposal.
5. The request indicates a bias against or preference for a specific 11
6. The request exceeds the department's authority.
(b) Any person aggrieved and directly affected by a decision of the office to issue 14
a notice of intent to award a contract under this section shall be entitled to judicial 15
review of the decision as provided in chapter 227, subject to the procedural 16
requirements of s. 227.53 (1). A person shall be considered a person aggrieved and 17
directly affected by a decision of the office if any of the following apply to a notice of 18
intent to award a contract under this section:
1. The design-builder that received the notice of intent to award a contract was 20
improperly certified as a qualified responsible bidder.
2. A mathematical error was made in scoring any of the proposals that resulted 22
in an improper intent to award a contract.
3. There is evidence of collusion or fraud involving either the design-builder 24
who received the notice of intent to award a contract or a member of the technical 25
4. There is evidence of bias of a member of the technical review committee.
5. There is evidence that a member of the technical review committee has a 3
conflict of interest because the committee member, a member of his or her immediate 4
family, as defined in s. 19.42 (7), or any organization or business with which the 5
member is associated, as defined in s. 19.42 (2), may benefit from the intent to award 6
6. The technical proposal or cost proposal submitted by the design-builder who 8
received the notice of intent to award a contract is not responsive to the request for 9
proposals, contains conditions or qualifications not provided for in the request for 10
proposals, or does not assign costs to all services identified in the technical proposal 11
or is otherwise materially unbalanced.
(c) If the office prevails upon judicial review, following any protest and 13
appellate court proceedings, the office shall be entitled to recover all costs and 14
charges included in the final order or judgment, excluding attorney's fees. Upon 15
payment of costs and charges by the protester, the bond shall be returned. If the 16
protesting party prevails, the protesting party shall be entitled to recover from the 17
office all costs and charges included in the final order or judgment, excluding 18
attorney's fees. The entire amount of the bond shall be forfeited if the hearing officer 19
determines that a protest was filed for a frivolous or improper purpose, including but 20
not limited to the purpose of harassing, causing unnecessary delay, or causing 21
needless cost for the office or parties.
(a) No later than 3 months after the effective date of this 23
act .... [LRB inserts date], the office shall prepare a report that establishes a program 24
structure for delivering projects as required under this subsection. The report shall 25
specify the types of highway improvement projects to be considered and procedures
and timelines for the bid process. The office may not designate a highway 2
improvement project as a design-build project prior to the completion of the report.
(b) No later than 6 months after the effective date of this act .... [LRB inserts 4
date], the office shall prepare a design-build procurement manual that incorporates 5
the requirements under this subsection and any applicable requirements under 6
federal law. The manual shall be created by a committee that includes all of the 7
1. The director.
2. Two employees of the department who represent the division of the 10
department responsible for transportation project development and who each have 11
not less than 5 years of experience in the transportation construction industry.
3. One person representing a state association of transportation architectural, 13
engineering, or design companies selected from a list of 3 individuals created by the 14
majority leader of the senate.
4. One person representing a state association of transportation construction 16
companies selected from a list of 3 individuals created by the speaker of the assembly.
5. One person representing a national trade group with a design-build 18
certification program and experience in assisting states with the implementation of 19
a design-build program.
(c) No later than December 31, 2026, the office shall submit a report the joint 21
committee on finance and the senate and assembly standing committees having 22
jurisdiction over transportation matters summarizing observations of the process 23
utilized for alternative project delivery methods and describing the effectiveness of 24
the alternative project delivery methods contracting procedures. The report shall 25
include discussion on scope of work, history of projects selected, evaluation criteria,
selection process, contract administration, work progression, time and cost 2
comparisons between the traditional contracting method and alternative delivery 3
methods, claims, and changes.
(d) No later than 6 months after receipt of the report required under par. (c), 5
the joint committee on finance shall determine whether the alternative project 6
delivery pilot program was successful in providing the department with additional 7
tools that allow innovation, reduced project completion time, cost certainty, or 8
reduced cost or other advantages or benefits and shall make a recommendation to 9
the legislature as to whether the pilot program should be made permanent.
85.64 of the statutes is created to read:
1185.64 Office of innovative program delivery. (1)
In this section:
(a) “Director” means the director of the office of innovative program delivery 13
attached to the department under s. 15.463 (1).
(b) “Office” means the office of innovative program delivery attached to the 15
department under s. 15.463 (1).
The secretary shall appoint a director who has no fewer than 5 years of 17
experience in design-build project development and delivery specific to public 18
transportation or public infrastructure construction.
The director shall do all of the following:
(a) Perform the duties and functions required under s. 84.062.
(b) Employ, supervise, and train personnel assigned to the office by the 22
(c) Supervise all expenditures of the office.
The office shall perform the duties and functions required under s. 84.062.
(1) Emergency rules.
The department of transportation may use the procedure 2
under s. 227.24 to promulgate emergency rules under s. 84.062 (5) to (7) for the period 3
before the date on which permanent rules under s. 84.062 (5) to (7) take effect. 4
Notwithstanding s. 227.24 (1) (c) and (2), emergency rules promulgated under this 5
subsection remain in effect until the first day of the 25th month beginning after the 6
effective date of the emergency rule, the date on which the permanent rules take 7
effect, of the effective date of the repeal of the emergency rule, whichever is earlier. 8
Notwithstanding s. 227.24 (1) (a) and (3), the department of transportation is not 9
required to provide evidence that promulgating a rule under this subsection as 10
emergency rules is necessary for the preservation of public peace, health, safety, or 11
welfare and is not required to provide a finding of emergency for a rule promulgated 12
under this subsection.
(2) Employees of the office of innovative program delivery.
The secretary of 14
the department of transportation shall assign from the department's existing 15
position authority at least 1.0 FTE position to the office of innovative program 16
delivery attached to the department of transportation.