SB370: Bill Text

LRB-3376/2

RCT&MES:kmg:ch

1995 - 1996 LEGISLATURE

1995 Senate BILL 370

October 10, 1995 - Introduced by Joint Legislative Council. Referred to Joint survey committee on Tax Exemptions.

SB370,2,2 An Act to repeal 71.61 (2); to renumber 91.55 (3); to renumber and amend 91.78; to amend 20.115 (7) (g), 20.835 (2) (dm), 66.021 (11) (title) and (a), 66.021 (11) (b), 66.021 (11) (c) (intro.), 66.021 (11) (d), 71.05 (6) (a) 17., 71.58 (8), 71.59 (1) (a), 71.59 (1) (d) 5. and (2) (b) and (c), 71.60 (title), (1) (intro.) and (2), 91.06, 91.19 (7) and (8), 91.21 (1), 91.51, 91.55 (1) (b), 91.63, 91.73 (2), 91.75 (8) (b), 92.104 (5), 92.105 (6), 92.14 (3) (intro.), 144.04 (1), 236.11 (2), 236.12 (3), 236.12 (6), 301.046 (1), 301.048 (4) (b) and 301.16 (2); and to create 20.835 (2) (r), 32.036, 66.021 (11) (d), 71.05 (6) (b) 22., 71.07 (3m) (e), 71.26 (1) (i), 71.28 (2m) (e), 71.47 (2m) (e), 71.58 (1) (h), 71.605, 91.25, 91.52, 91.55 (1m) (intro.) and (a), 91.72, 91.75 (10), 91.77 (1) (d), 91.77 (1) (e), 91.78 (2), 92.14 (3e), 145.19 (7), 147.25 (9) and 236.13 (1) (bm) of the statutes; relating to: eliminating farmland preservation agreements, modifying the requirement to repay farmland preservation credits, converting the farmland preservation credit to a straight percentage of property taxes accrued, terminating the farmland tax relief credit, creating guidelines for the designation of agricultural preservation areas by counties, creating guidelines for the rezoning of land in an exclusive agricultural zone to residential use, making conformance with certified county agricultural preservation plans a condition in certain land use decisions, granting rule-making authority and making appropriations.

Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill is explained in the Notes provided by the joint legislative council in the bill.

This bill will be referred to the joint survey committee on tax exemptions for a detailed analysis, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.

For further information see the state and local fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.

The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:

Prefatory note: This bill contains the recommendations of the joint legislative council's special committee on protection of rural resources. The special committee was directed by the joint legislative council to evaluate and make recommendations to enhance the effectiveness of the farmland preservation program in retaining land in agricultural use.

This bill contains a variety of proposals for modifications to the farmland preservation program, including the following key provisions:

1. Elimination of farmland preservation agreements as a farmland preservation tool and a method for landowners to obtain farmland preservation credits.

2. Reduction from 10 to 5 the number of years for which farmland preservation credits must be repaid when a farmland preservation agreement is relinquished or when farmland is no longer protected under exclusive agricultural zoning.

3. Conversion of the farmland preservation credit from an income-based formula to a straight percentage of property taxes accrued, with a $7,500 cap on the maximum amount of the credit.

4. Repeal of the farmland tax relief credit.

5. Creation of guidelines for the designation of agricultural preservation areas by counties and for the rezoning of land in an exclusive agricultural zone to residential use.

6. Establishment of linkages between county agricultural preservation plans and other current statutes with land use implications, including subdivision plat approval, sewer extensions, land condominiums, annexation and condemnation of land.

For detailed information about the provisions of this bill, see the Notes throughout the bill.

SB370, s. 1 Section 1. 20.115 (7) (g) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB370,3,2 20.115 (7) (g) (title) Agricultural impact statements Effect of condemnation on farm operators. All moneys received by the department under s. 32.035 from the preparation of agricultural impact statements and under s. 32.036 from determining whether condemnation conforms with county agricultural preservation plans, for general program operations.

Note: Allows the department of agriculture, trade and consumer protection (DATCP) to expend the fees collected for review of condemnation actions, in order to determine conformity with county agricultural preservation plans.

SB370, s. 2 Section 2. 20.835 (2) (dm) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB370,3,6 20.835 (2) (dm) (title) Farmland preservation credit supplement. A sum sufficient to pay the aggregate claims approved under subch. IX of ch. 71 that exceed the amount appropriated under par. (r).

SB370, s. 3 Section 3 . 20.835 (2) (r) of the statutes is created to read:

SB370,3,11 20.835 (2) (r) Farmland preservation credit. From the lottery fund, a sum sufficient, not to exceed, in a fiscal year, $16,300,000, less the amounts expended under par. (q) in that fiscal year, to pay the aggregate claims approved under subch. IX of ch. 71.

Note: Transfers the funding for the farmland tax relief credit, which is terminated under this bill, except for payments to persons who refile their tax returns, to fund the farmland preservation credit. The farmland tax relief credit is funded by a sum sufficient appropriation from the lottery fund, and in fiscal year 1994-95 the amount estimated for this credit was $16,300,000. This bill makes an appropriation from the lottery fund with a cap of $16,300,000, to first fund any payments for refilers for the farmland tax relief credit, with the remainder to fund the farmland preservation credit. The remainder of the funding for the farmland preservation credit is a sum sufficient appropriation from the general fund, as under current law.

SB370, s. 4 Section 4. 32.036 of the statutes is created to read:

SB370,3,14 32.036 Conformity with county agricultural preservation plan. (1) Definitions. In this section:

SB370,3,16 (a) "Department" means the department of agriculture, trade and consumer protection.

SB370,3,17 (b) "Farm operation" has the meaning given in s. 32.035 (1) (b).

SB370,3,19 (2) Applicability. This section does not apply to a project located entirely within the boundaries of a city or village.

SB370,4,7 (3) Procedure . The condemnor shall notify the department of any project involving the actual or potential exercise of the powers of eminent domain affecting a farm operation. The notice required under s. 32.035 (3) shall be considered notice under this subsection. The department may require the condemnor to compile and submit information about an affected farm operation. The department shall charge the condemnor a fee approximating the actual costs of the review and determination under this section.

SB370,4,12 (4) Review and determination . The department shall review the project and determine whether it conforms with any county agricultural preservation plan that is certified under s. 91.06. If the department determines that the project does not conform with a certified county agricultural preservation plan, the condemnor may not proceed with the project unless one of the following occurs:

SB370,4,15 (a) The county amends the agricultural preservation plan, the land and water conservation board certifies the amended plan under s. 91.06 and the department determines that the project conforms with the amended plan.

SB370,4,18 (b) The condemnor submits a petition to the land and water conservation board and the land and water conservation board determines that one or more of the conditions listed in s. 91.55 (2) exist with respect to the project.

SB370,4,23 (c) If the project consists of the creation of or an addition to a park, the condemnor submits a petition for review to the land and water conservation board and the land and water conservation board determines that the project is consistent with the statement of policy in the county agricultural preservation plan as required under s. 91.55 (1) (a).

SB370,5,3 (5) Preparation time. The department shall complete the review and determination under this section within 60 days after receiving the information requested from the condemnor under sub. (3).

Note: Requires the DATCP to review each project involving the actual or potential exercise of the powers of eminent domain and affecting a farm operation, to determine whether the project is in conformance with the applicable county agricultural preservation plan. A "condemnor" is any entity with the power of eminent domain, and includes state agencies, general purpose local units of government, special purpose districts and public utilities.

If the DATCP determines that the project is not in conformance with a county agricultural preservation plan, the condemnor may either seek to have the county plan amended or petition the land and water conservation board (LWCB) for a determination regarding the existence of any of the conditions in s. 91.55 (2) for excluding land from a county agricultural preservation plan. The conditions for excluding land from a county agricultural preservation plan are as follows:

1. Existing or planned activities adjacent to the identified agricultural area are incompatible with agricultural use.

2. The area is not economically viable for agricultural use.

3. Substantial urban growth in the area or planned urban expansion has created a public need to convert agricultural land use to other uses.

4. Maintenance of the area in agricultural use is not consistent with the goals and objectives of a county agricultural preservation plan.

If the project consists of a new or expanded park, and the project is not in conformance with the county agricultural preservation plan, the condemnor may petition the LWCB for approval of the project. The LWCB may approve the project if it is consistent with the general statements of policy in the county agricultural preservation plan, even though the project may not conform with the specific requirements of the plan.

SB370, s. 5 Section 5. 66.021 (11) (title) and (a) of the statutes are amended to read:

SB370,5,11 66.021 (11) (title) Review and approval of annexations. (a) (title) Annexations within populous counties Notice of annexation . No annexation proceeding within a county having a population of 50,000 or more shall be valid unless the person causing a notice of annexation to be published under sub. (3) shall within 5 days of the publication mail a copy of the notice, legal description and a scale map of the proposed annexation to the clerk of each municipality affected and the department of administration.

SB370,6,7 (b) (title) Review of annexations within populous counties. The department of administration may, within 20 days after receipt of the notice under par. (a) regarding an annexation proceeding within a county having a population of 50,000 or more, mail to the clerk of the town within which the territory lies and to the clerk of the proposed annexing village or city a notice that in its opinion the annexation is against the public interest. No later than 10 days after mailing the notice, the department shall advise the clerk of the town in which the territory is located and the clerk of the village or city to which the annexation is proposed of the reasons the annexation is against the public interest as defined, as that term is used in par. (c). The annexing municipality shall review the advice before final action is taken.