LRB-2179/1
RPN:lmk:pg
2005 - 2006 LEGISLATURE
March 30, 2005 - Introduced by Joint Legislative Council. Referred to
Committee on Veterans, Homeland Security, Military Affairs, Small Business
and Government Reform.
SB150,2,2 1An Act to repeal 227.114 (7); to amend 227.114 (5), 227.115 (2), 227.116 (4)
2(intro.) and (5), 227.135 (1) (e), 227.135 (2) and (3), 227.137 (2) (intro.), 227.138
3(2) (intro.), 227.14 (2) (a) (intro.), 227.14 (2) (a) 4., 227.14 (2g) (intro.), 227.14
4(2m), 227.14 (4m), 227.15 (1m) (intro.), 227.17 (2), 227.17 (3) (d), 227.19 (2),
5227.19 (3) (intro.), 227.19 (4) (b) 1. (intro.), 227.19 (4) (b) 2., 227.19 (4) (b) 6.,
6227.19 (4) (c), 227.19 (5) (a), 227.19 (5) (b) 1. (intro.), 227.19 (5) (b) 2., 227.19 (5)
7(b) 4., 227.19 (5) (e), 227.19 (5) (g) (intro.), 227.19 (6) (b), 227.20 (1), (2), and (3)
8(intro.), 227.21 (2) (b), 227.22 (2) (e), 227.24 (2) (am), 227.24 (2) (c), 227.24 (3m)
9(intro.), 227.25 (3), 227.26 (2) (f), 227.26 (2) (h), 227.26 (2) (j), 227.27 (2), 227.30
10(1), 227.30 (3), 227.40 (2) (f) and 601.41 (3) (b); and to create 227.14 (2) (a) 7.
11and 8., 227.14 (6) (d), 227.19 (3) (g), 227.19 (3) (h), 227.19 (4) (b) 3m. and 227.26

1(2) (L) of the statutes; relating to: making technical and minor substantive
2changes in the administrative rule-making process.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau
For further information, see the Notes provided by the Law Revision
Committee of the Joint Legislative Council.
For further information see the state fiscal estimate, which will be printed as
an appendix to this bill.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do
enact as follows:
Joint Legislative Council prefatory note: On May 4, 2004, the co-chairs of the
joint legislative council directed the legislative council staff to examine current laws
relating to the procedures used for the promulgation of administrative rules and to
develop proposed legislation that modifies current statutory language, codifies practices
used in the process, coordinates statutory changes made in the 2003 session of the
legislature, and makes minor substantive changes to the law.
In order to fulfill this request, the legislative council staff sought comments from
rule-promulgating state agencies, the chief clerks of the legislature, and the revisor of
statutes. This bill, as described in notes accompanying each Section, responds to many
of the comments the legislative council staff received as well as to issues noted by the
experience of the legislative council staff itself.
SB150, s. 1 3Section 1. 227.114 (5) of the statutes is amended to read:
SB150,2,64 227.114 (5) Prior to the notice required under s. 227.17 (1) (a), the agency shall
5notify the secretary of commerce and the small business ombudsman clearinghouse
6that it proposes to promulgate a rule that will have an effect on small businesses.
Note: Current law requires a rule-promulgating agency to notify the secretary of
commerce and the small business ombudsman clearinghouse when the agency proposes
to promulgate a rule that will have an effect on small businesses. This Section deletes
the reference to the small business ombudsman clearinghouse, since the clearinghouse
no longer exists.
SB150, s. 2 7Section 2. 227.114 (7) of the statutes is repealed.
Note: Current law requires each agency, for the 5-year period beginning after
December 31, 1983, to review the agency's rules to reduce their impact on small
businesses. This Section repeals the statutory provision, since it is no longer applicable.
SB150, s. 3 8Section 3. 227.115 (2) of the statutes is amended to read:
SB150,3,8
1227.115 (2) Report on rules affecting housing. If a proposed rule directly or
2substantially affects the development, construction, cost, or availability of housing
3in this state, the department, through the division of housing, shall prepare a report
4on the proposed rule before it is submitted to the legislative council staff under s.
5227.15. The department may request any information from other state agencies,
6local governments or individuals or organizations that is reasonably necessary for
7the department to prepare the report. The department shall prepare the report
8within 30 days after the rule is submitted to the department.
Note: Current law requires the department of commerce, through its division of
housing, to prepare a report on a proposed rule that directly or substantially affects the
development, construction, cost, or availability of housing in Wisconsin. This Section
removes the reference to the division of housing, since the department no longer has such
a division.
SB150, s. 4 9Section 4. 227.116 (4) (intro.) and (5) of the statutes are amended to read:
SB150,3,1410 227.116 (4) (intro.) If an agency fails to review and make a determination on
11a permit application within the time period specified in a rule or law, for each such
12failure the agency shall prepare a report and submit it to the business development
13assistance center
department of commerce within 5 business days of the last day of
14the time period specified, setting forth all of the following:
SB150,3,18 15(5) If an agency fails to review and make a determination on a permit
16application within the time period specified in a rule or law, upon completion of the
17review and determination for that application, the agency shall notify the business
18development assistance center
department of commerce.
Note: Current law requires that an agency make various reports to the business
development assistance center when it fails to review and make a determination on a
permit application within the time specified in a rule or law. This Section requires that
the information be delivered to the department of commerce, since the business
development assistance center no longer exists.
SB150, s. 5 19Section 5. 227.135 (1) (e) of the statutes is amended to read:
SB150,4,2
1227.135 (1) (e) A description of all of the entities that will may be affected by
2the rule.
Note: Current law requires that an agency scope statement include a description
of all of the entities that will be affected by a proposed rule of the agency. This Section
requires the scope statement to describe all of the entities that may be affected by the
proposed rule, because it may be impossible for an agency to be aware of every entity that
will be affected by the proposed rule.
SB150, s. 6 3Section 6. 227.135 (2) and (3) of the statutes are amended to read:
SB150,4,154 227.135 (2) Until the individual or body with policy-making powers over the
5subject matter of a proposed rule approves a statement of the scope of the proposed
6rule, a state employee or official may not perform any activity in connection with
7drafting the proposed rule except for an activity necessary to prepare the statement
8of the scope of the proposed rule. The individual or body with policy-making powers
9may not approve a statement until at least 10 days after publication of the statement
10in the register as required under sub. (3).
If the individual or body with
11policy-making powers over the subject matter of a proposed rule does not disapprove
12the statement of the scope of the proposed rule within 30 days after the statement
13is presented to the individual or body, or by the 11th day after publication of the
14statement in the register, whichever is later,
the statement is considered to be
15approved.
SB150,4,22 16(3) The agency shall send the statement of the scope of a proposed rule to the
17revisor for publication in the register. On the same day that the agency sends the
18statement to the revisor, the agency shall send a copy of the statement to the
19secretary of administration. The individual or body with policy-making powers over
20the subject matter of a proposed rule may not take action on a statement of the scope
21of the proposed rule until at least 10 days after publication of the statement in the
22register.

Note: Current law states that if an individual or body with policy-making powers
does not disapprove a scope statement within 30 days after the statement is presented
to that individual or body, the statement is considered to be approved and work may begin
on drafting the proposed rule. However, current law also states that the individual or
body may not take action on a scope statement until at least 10 days after publication of
the statement in the Wisconsin administrative register. Since the latter date may occur
more than 30 days after the scope statement is presented to the individual or body, this
Section provides that if the individual or body does not disapprove the scope statement
within 30 days after the statement is presented to the individual or body, or by the 11th
day after publication of the statement in the register, whichever is later, the statement
is considered to be approved.
SB150, s. 7 1Section 7 . 227.137 (2) (intro.) of the statutes is amended to read:
SB150,5,192 227.137 (2) (intro.) After an agency publishes a statement of the scope of a
3proposed rule under s. 227.135, and before the agency submits the proposed rule to
4the legislative council for review under s. 227.15 legislature for review under s.
5227.19 (2)
, a municipality, an association that represents a farm, labor, business, or
6professional group, or 5 or more persons that would be directly and uniquely affected
7by the proposed rule may submit a petition to the department of administration
8asking that the secretary of administration direct the agency to prepare an economic
9impact report for the proposed rule. The agency shall prepare an economic impact
10report before submitting the proposed rule to the legislative council staff under s.
11227.15
legislature for review under s. 227.19 (2) if the secretary of administration
12directs the agency to prepare that report. The secretary of administration may direct
13the agency to prepare an economic impact report for the proposed rule before
14submitting the proposed rule to the legislative council staff under s. 227.15
15legislature for review under s. 227.19 (2). The secretary of administration shall
16direct the agency to prepare an economic impact report for the proposed rule before
17submitting the proposed rule to the legislative council staff under s. 227.15
18legislature for review under s. 227.19 (2) if the secretary determines that all of the
19following apply:

Note: Current law provides that a request for an economic impact report may be
made with respect to a proposed rule offered by the departments of agriculture, trade and
consumer protection; commerce; natural resources; transportation; or workforce
development. If a report is requested, the report must be prepared before the agency
submits the proposed rule to the legislative council staff for review. In order to abide by
this requirement, an affected agency must allow the period for making the request to
expire. A request for the economic impact report must be submitted to the department
of administration no later than 90 days after the publication of the scope statement or no
later than 10 days after publication of the notice for a public hearing regarding the
proposed rule, whichever is earlier. Sections 7 and 8 allow an agency to submit a
proposed rule to the legislative council staff prior to the preparation of an economic
impact report. Although, under current law, both the department of administration and
the legislative council staff will review such a rule for the statutory authority of the
agency to promulgate it, the reports of each body are fundamentally different; the
economic impact report focuses on the economic effects of the proposed rule, while the
legislative council staff report is concerned with the clarity of the proposed rule and
editorial matters. There is no need to delay the rule-making process with respect to rules
that will never be the subject of a request for an economic impact report. When such a
report is requested, the preparation of the legislative council staff report should have no
impact on the department's independent review of the proposed rule. Under this Section,
an agency that is directed to prepare an economic impact report must finalize the report
before the proposed rule is submitted to the legislature for review under s. 227.19 (2),
stats.
SB150, s. 8 1Section 8 . 227.138 (2) (intro.) of the statutes is amended to read:
SB150,6,72 227.138 (2) (intro.) If an economic impact report will be prepared under s.
3227.137 (2) regarding a proposed rule, the department shall review the proposed rule
4and issue a report. The agency shall not submit a proposed rule to the legislative
5council staff for review under s. 227.15 (1)
legislature for review under s. 227.19 (2)
6until the agency receives a copy of the department's report and the approval of the
7secretary of administration. The report shall include all of the following findings:
Note: See Note to Section 7.
SB150, s. 9 8Section 9. 227.14 (2) (a) (intro.) of the statutes is amended to read:
SB150,6,129 227.14 (2) (a) (intro.) An agency shall prepare in plain language an analysis
10of each proposed rule, which shall be printed with the as a preface to the text of the
11proposed rule when it is published or distributed. The analysis shall include all of
12the following:
Note: Current law requires an agency to prepare an analysis of each proposed rule.
The analysis must be printed with the proposed rule when it is published or distributed.
Some agencies have interpreted this requirement to mean that the analysis must be

printed both as a separate document attached to the proposed rule and as part of the
preface to the proposed rule. This Section clarifies that double publication is not
required; the analysis need be published only once as a preface to the text of the proposed
rule.
SB150, s. 10 1Section 10. 227.14 (2) (a) 4. of the statutes is amended to read:
SB150,7,32 227.14 (2) (a) 4. A comparison of with similar rules in adjacent states Illinois,
3Iowa, Michigan, and Minnesota
.
Note: Current law requires that an agency prepare a plain language analysis of
a proposed rule. One of the items that must be included is a comparison with similar rules
in adjacent states. This Section specifically names the 4 adjacent states.
SB150, s. 11 4Section 11. 227.14 (2) (a) 7. and 8. of the statutes are created to read:
SB150,7,65 227.14 (2) (a) 7. The electronic mail address and telephone number of an agency
6contact person for the proposed rule.
SB150,7,97 8. The place where comments on the proposed rule should be submitted and the
8deadline for submitting those comments, if the deadline is known at the time the
9proposed rule is submitted to the legislative council staff under s. 227.15.
Note: Section 227.15 (1m), stats., requires the legislative council staff to create
and maintain an Internet site that includes a copy of each proposed rule it receives.
Among the information that is required to be included on the site is the electronic mail
address and a telephone number of an agency contact person for each proposed rule and
a place where comments on the proposed rule should be submitted and a deadline for
submitting those comments. This Section requires an agency to place in its rule analysis:
(1) the electronic mail address and telephone number of an agency contact person for the
proposed rule; and (2) the place where the comments on the proposed rule should be
submitted and the deadline for submitting those comments, if the deadline is known at
the time the proposed rule is submitted to the legislative council staff. This information
then will be placed on the Internet site when the entire rule is posted there by the
legislative council staff.
SB150, s. 12 10Section 12. 227.14 (2g) (intro.) of the statutes is amended to read:
Loading...
Loading...