LRB-2610/1
SRM:kjf:nwn
2007 - 2008 LEGISLATURE
May 9, 2007 - Introduced by Representatives Nelson, Tauchen, Hraychuck,
Mursau, Jorgensen, Murtha, Soletski, Davis, Garthwaite, Hines, Smith,
Krusick, Travis, Hixson, Van Roy, Nerison, Molepske, Vruwink, Moulton,
Sheridan, Hintz, Van Akkeren, Toles, Mason, A. Ott, Jeskewitz, Kaufert,
Cullen, Richards, Hubler, Kreuser, Sherman, Sinicki, Hilgenberg,
Staskunas, Grigsby, Schneider, Berceau, Gronemus, Hebl, Steinbrink,
Benedict, Seidel, Shilling, Fields, Turner, Young, Zepnick, Boyle, Pocan,
Wasserman, Pope-Roberts, Parisi, Black, Kessler, Colon
and M. Williams,
cosponsored by Senators Plale, Kreitlow, Wirch, Sullivan, Taylor, Coggs,
Hansen, Lehman, Risser, Roessler, Lassa, Carpenter
and Leibham. Referred
to Committee on Rules.
AJR52,1,2 1Relating to: urging U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Secretary
2Michael Leavitt to renew SeniorCare.
AJR52,1,53 Whereas, Wisconsin's congressional delegation has made great strides to save
4SeniorCare, Wisconsin's highly successful prescription drug program for seniors,
5and should be duly thanked for their efforts to save the program; and
AJR52,1,86 Whereas, SeniorCare is set to expire on June 30, 2007, unless the federal
7government grants the state's request for a three-year waiver to continue the
8program; and
AJR52,1,119 Whereas, many of SeniorCare's current 105,000 beneficiaries, and an untold
10number of future beneficiaries, may face undue hardship if the program were to end;
11and
AJR52,1,1412 Whereas, in most cases, SeniorCare provides better coverage, is less expensive,
13and is much easier to apply for than the federal Medicare Part D prescription drug
14benefit; and
AJR52,2,3
1Whereas, unlike Medicare Part D, SeniorCare negotiates lower prices with
2drug companies and actually costs taxpayers much less than the federal program;
3and
AJR52,2,64 Whereas, the federal government spends on average about $617 per
5SeniorCare participant, almost half as much as the $1,174 it spends per Medicare
6Part D participant; and
AJR52,2,107 Whereas, SeniorCare has already saved Wisconsin seniors and taxpayers
8hundreds of millions of dollars since its inception in 2002, reducing prescription drug
9costs for more than 100,000 seniors by almost $200 million in state fiscal year 2006
10alone; and
AJR52,2,1311 Whereas, according to an analysis by AARP Wisconsin, more than 94 percent
12of seniors are better off on SeniorCare than they would be under Medicare Part D
13because the copayments are lower and the coverage is more comprehensive; and
AJR52,2,1714 Whereas, Wisconsin Governor Jim Doyle submitted a request to the U.S.
15Department of Health and Human Services on October 23, 2006, to extend the state's
16SeniorCare Pharmacy Plus Waiver for three years to June 30, 2010; now, therefore,
17be it
AJR52,2,21 18Resolved by the assembly, the senate concurring, That the legislature of
19the state of Wisconsin urges U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
20Secretary Michael Leavitt to extend the federal waiver that funds Wisconsin's
21SeniorCare program; and, be it further
AJR52,2,23 22Resolved, That the assembly chief clerk shall provide a copy of this joint
23resolution to the president.
AJR52,2,2424 (End)
Loading...
Loading...