LRB-1758/1
GMM:bjk:rs
2009 - 2010 LEGISLATURE
April 6, 2009 - Introduced by Joint Legislative Council. Referred to Committee
on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and
Housing.
SB152,1,3 1An Act to amend 938.18 (6) of the statutes; relating to: creating a rebuttable
2presumption of retaining juvenile court jurisdiction in waiver proceedings
3involving a first offender.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill is explained in the Notes provided by the Joint Legislative Council in
the bill.
For further information see the state and local fiscal estimate, which will be
printed as an appendix to this bill.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do
enact as follows:
Joint Legislative Council prefatory note: This bill was prepared for the Joint
Legislative Council's Special Committee on High-Risk Juvenile Offenders.
Under current law, the court assigned to exercise jurisdiction under the Juvenile
Justice Code (juvenile court) may waive its jurisdiction over a juvenile who is alleged to
have violated one of several serious offenses on or after the juvenile's 14th birthday and
over a juvenile who is alleged to have violated any criminal law on or after the juvenile's
15th birthday and transfer the case to a court of criminal jurisdiction (adult court).
The juvenile court must base its decision whether to waive jurisdiction on specified
criteria, including the juvenile's personality and prior record.

This bill creates a rebuttable presumption that the juvenile court must retain
jurisdiction if the juvenile has not previously been adjudicated delinquent.
SB152, s. 1 1Section 1. 938.18 (6) of the statutes is amended to read:
SB152,2,102 938.18 (6) Decision on waiver. After considering the criteria under sub. (5),
3the court shall state its finding with respect to the criteria on the record, and, if the
4court determines on the record that there is clear and convincing evidence that it is
5contrary to the best interests of the juvenile or of the public to hear the case, the court
6shall enter an order waiving jurisdiction and referring the matter to the district
7attorney for appropriate proceedings in the court of criminal jurisdiction. There is
8a rebuttable presumption that the court shall retain jurisdiction if the juvenile has
9not previously been adjudicated delinquent.
After the an order waiving jurisdiction,
10the court of criminal jurisdiction has exclusive jurisdiction.
Note: Creates a rebuttable presumption that in a proceeding to waive the
jurisdiction of the juvenile court and transfer the case to adult court, the juvenile court
must retain jurisdiction if the juvenile has not previously been adjudicated delinquent.
SB152, s. 2 11Section 2. Initial applicability.
SB152,2,1612 (1) Rebuttable presumption for first offenders. This act first applies to
13offenses committed on the effective date of this subsection, but does not preclude
14consideration of a juvenile's prior record in determining whether to waive the
15jurisdiction of the court assigned to exercise jurisdiction under chapter 938 of the
16statutes.
SB152,2,1717 (End)
Loading...
Loading...