LRB-0872/1
RAC:kjf:ph
2009 - 2010 LEGISLATURE
February 5, 2009 - Introduced by Senators Carpenter, Lehman and Harsdorf,
cosponsored by Representatives Pasch, Van Akkeren, Lothian and Townsend.
Referred to Committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations.
SJR11,1,3 1To renumber section 23a of article IV; and to create section 23a (2) of article IV of
2the constitution; relating to: veto power of county executive over
3appropriations (first consideration).
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau
The constitution grants the chief executive of a county the power to approve
appropriations contained in resolutions or ordinances in whole or part. This
executive power is similar to that granted the governor with respect to
appropriations bills. In fact, in 1984, the attorney general opined that the county
executive's veto power over appropriations "is not dissimilar to that of the Governor"
(OAG 27-84). This proposed constitutional amendment, proposed to the 2009
legislature on first consideration, provides that, in approving an appropriation in
part, the county executive may not create a new word by rejecting individual letters
in the words of the resolution or ordinance and may not create a new sentence by
combining parts of two or more sentences of the resolution or ordinance. These are
the identical restrictions that are currently placed on the governor in the exercise of
his or her veto power over appropriations bills.
A proposed constitutional amendment requires adoption by two successive
legislatures, and ratification by the people, before it can become effective.
SJR11,1,4 4Resolved by the senate, the assembly concurring, That:
SJR11, s. 1
1Section 1. Section 23a of article IV of the constitution is renumbered 23a (1)
2of article IV of the constitution.
SJR11, s. 2 3Section 2. Section 23a (2) of article IV of the constitution is created to read:
SJR11,2,74 [Article IV] Section 23a (2) In approving an appropriation in part under sub.
5(1), the chief executive may not create a new word by rejecting individual letters in
6the words of the resolution or ordinance and may not create a new sentence by
7combining parts of 2 or more sentences of the resolution or ordinance.
SJR11, s. 3 8Section 3. Numbering of new provisions. The new subsection (2) of section
923a of article IV of the constitution created in this joint resolution shall be designated
10by the next higher open whole subsection number in that section in that article if,
11before the ratification by the people of the amendment proposed in this joint
12resolution, any other ratified amendment has created a subsection (2) of section 23a
13of article IV of the constitution of this state. If one or more joint resolutions create
14a subsection (2) of section 23a of article IV simultaneously with the ratification by
15the people of the amendment proposed in this joint resolution, the subsections
16created shall be numbered and placed in a sequence so that the subsections created
17by the joint resolution having the lowest enrolled joint resolution number have the
18numbers designated in that joint resolution and the subsections created by the other
19joint resolutions have numbers that are in the same ascending order as are the
20numbers of the enrolled joint resolutions creating the subsections.
SJR11,2,23 21Be it further resolved, That this proposed amendment be referred to the
22legislature to be chosen at the next general election and that it be published for 3
23months previous to the time of holding such election.
SJR11,2,2424 (End)
Loading...
Loading...