LRB-0456/1
TKK:jld:ph
2011 - 2012 LEGISLATURE
February 22, 2011 - Introduced by Representatives Nass, Jacque, August,
LeMahieu, Spanbauer, Knodl, Ziegelbauer, Pridemore, Kerkman, Ballweg,
Tiffany, Strachota, Rivard, Petersen, Bies, Farrow, Marklein
and Kaufert,
cosponsored by Senators Lazich, Kedzie, Lasee and Leibham. Referred to
Committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs.
AB26,1,3 1An Act to repeal 118.134; and to amend 118.51 (13) of the statutes; relating
2to:
the use of race-based nicknames, logos, mascots, and team names by school
3boards.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, a school district resident may object to the use of a
race-based nickname, logo, mascot, or team name by the school board of the district
by filing a complaint with the state superintendent of public instruction. Upon
receipt of a complaint, the state superintendent must notify the school board and
must, with certain exceptions, schedule a contested case hearing. At the hearing, the
school board must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the use of the
race-based nickname, logo, mascot, or team name does not promote discrimination,
pupil harassment, or stereotyping, as defined by the state superintendent by rule.
Following the hearing, the state superintendent must issue a written decision
and order. The state superintendent must dismiss the complaint unless he or she
determines that the school board's use of the race-based nickname, logo, mascot, or
team name promotes discrimination, pupil harassment, or stereotyping. If the state
superintendent finds that the school board's use promotes discrimination, pupil
harassment, or stereotyping, the state superintendent must order the school board
to terminate its use of the nickname, logo, mascot or team name; and the school board
must, with limited exceptions, do so within 12 months after the school board receives
the order. Failure of a school board to comply with the decision and order subjects
the school board to forfeitures. A decision of the state superintendent under the
complaint, hearing, and order process is subject to judicial review.

This bill eliminates the specific right of a school district resident to object to the
use of a race-based nickname, logo, mascot, or team name by filing a complaint with
the school board and eliminates the right of the school district resident to obtain a
contested case hearing on that complaint. The bill eliminates the authority granted
to the state superintendent to determine whether the use of a race-based nickname,
logo, mascot, or team name promotes discrimination, pupil harassment, or
stereotyping; to order a school board to terminate the use of a race-based nickname,
logo, mascot, or team name; and to impose forfeitures upon the school board for
failure to comply with the order.
The bill also voids all orders issued by the state superintendent under the
complaint, hearing, and order process eliminated by this bill; requires the state
superintendent to dismiss with prejudice any complaints pending under the
complaint, hearing, and order process eliminated by the bill; and requires a court to
dismiss with prejudice any decision and order, issued by the state superintendent
under the complaint, hearing, and order process eliminated by the bill, for which
judicial review has been sought.
The bill does not eliminate the provision that permits a school district resident
to submit a complaint to a school board if the resident believes that he or she has been
discriminated against on the basis of a number of factors, including the person's race,
national origin, ancestry, or creed. A school district resident who submits such a
complaint to a school board may appeal a negative determination made by the school
board to the state superintendent.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do
enact as follows:
AB26, s. 1 1Section 1. 118.134 of the statutes is repealed.
AB26, s. 2 2Section 2. 118.51 (13) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB26,2,73 118.51 (13) Rights and privileges of nonresident pupils. Except as provided
4in s. 118.134 (3m), a
A pupil attending a public school in a nonresident school district
5under this section has all of the rights and privileges of pupils residing in that school
6district and is subject to the same rules and regulations as pupils residing in that
7school district.
AB26, s. 3 8Section 3. Nonstatutory provisions.
AB26,2,99 (1) Orders of department of public instruction void; notice.
AB26,3,3
1(a) Any decision and order issued before the effective date of this subsection by
2the state superintendent of public instruction under section 118.134 (3), 2009 stats.,
3is void.
AB26,3,64 (b) The state superintendent of public instruction shall provide written notice
5to the complainant and to the school district that a decision and order described in
6paragraph (a) is void.
AB26,3,77 (2) Pending complaints; notice.
AB26,3,108 (a) Any complaint filed before the effective date of this subsection under section
9118.134 (1), 2009 stats., shall be dismissed by the state superintendent of public
10instruction with prejudice.
AB26,3,1311 (b) The state superintendent of public instruction shall provide written notice
12to the complainant and to the school district that the complaint described in
13paragraph (a) has been dismissed.
AB26,3,1814 (3) Judicial review. Any decision and order issued by the state superintendent
15of public instruction under section 118.134 (3), 2009 stats., for which judicial review
16is pending under section 118.134 (3) (c), 2009 stats., on the effective date of this
17subsection shall be dismissed with prejudice by the court in which the review is
18pending.
AB26,3,1919 (End)
Loading...
Loading...