We appreciate the courtesy and cooperation extended to us by staff of the Department of Health and Social Services and local public health departments.
Respectfully submitted,
Dale Cattanach
State Auditor
__________________
State of Wisconsin
Legislative Audit Bureau
Madison
January 12, 1995
To the Honorable, the Legislature:
We have completed a review of the Medical College or Wisconsin, Inc., for the 1993-95 biennium, as required by s.
39.15, Wis. Stats. State funds paid to the Medical College for tuition aid totaled $8,042,527 for the biennium, during which the College also received $6,651,300 for the development and operation of its family practice residency program, and $403,000 in matching funds for the federal Area Health Education Centers project.
Our review included tests to ensure that the Medical College has complied with statutory requirements set forth in ss.
39.15 and
39.155, Wis. Stats. We reviewed the residency and enrollment status of the students claimed for tuition aid to determine whether they were certified Wisconsin residents, had been charged appropriate tuition, and had not been claimed for aid payments for more than four years. We also reviewed whether the Medical College gave first preference in admissions to Wisconsin residents and promoted minority access. We found the Medical College was in compliance with the statutory requirements.
We appreciate the courtesy and cooperation extended to us by Medical College of Wisconsin administrators and the staff of the Higher Educational Aids Board during this review.
Respectfully submitted,
Dale Cattanach
State Auditor
__________________
Representative Notestein introduced a privileged joint resolution.
Assembly Joint Resolution 76
Relating to: creating a bipartisan special joint committee on 1995 Assembly Bill 591 that creates a new public assistance program called Wisconsin works.
By
Representatives Notestein, Kunicki, Riley, Krug, R. Young, Bock, Schneider, R. Potter, Robson and Coggs
.
Referred to committee on Assembly Organization.
Representative Notestein asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Joint Resolution 76 be withdrawn from the committee on Assembly Organization and taken up at this time.
Representative Jensen objected.
Representative Notestein moved that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Joint Resolution 76 be withdrawn from the committee on Assembly Organization and taken up at this time.
The question was: Shall the rules be suspended and Assembly Joint Resolution 76 be withdrawn from the committee on Assembly Organization and taken up at this time?
The roll was taken.
The result follows:
Ayes - Representatives Baldus, Baldwin, Baumgart, Bell, Black, Bock, Boyle, Carpenter, Coggs, Cullen, Dueholm, Gronemus, Hanson, Hasenohrl, Huber, Hubler, Kreuser, Krug, Krusick, Kunicki, La Fave, Linton, Meyer, Morris-Tatum, Murat, Notestein, Plache, Plombon, R. Potter, Reynolds, Riley, Robson, Rutkowski, Schneider, Springer, Travis, Turner, Vander Loop, Wasserman, Wilder, Williams, Wirch, Wood, L. Young, R. Young and Ziegelbauer - 46.
Noes - Representatives Ainsworth, Albers, Brancel, Brandemuehl, Coleman, Dobyns, Duff, Foti, Freese, Gard, Goetsch, Green, Grothman, Gunderson, Hahn, Handrick, Harsdorf, Hoven, Huebsch, Hutchison, Jensen, Johnsrud, Kaufert, Kelso, Klusman, Kreibich, Ladwig, F. Lasee, Lazich, Lehman, Lorge, Musser, Nass, Olsen, Ott, Otte, Ourada, Owens, Porter, Powers, Schneiders, Seratti, Silbaugh, Skindrud, Underheim, Urban, Vrakas, Walker, Ward, Zukowski and Speaker Prosser - 51.
Absent or not voting - Representative Ryba - 1.
Motion failed.
Representative Nass asked unanimous consent to be withdrawn as a coauthor of Assembly Bill
588. Granted.
Representative Jensen asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 290 be withdrawn from the calendar of Tuesday, January 23 and taken up at this time. Granted.
Assembly Bill 290
Relating to: responsibility for unpaid utility bills and municipal utility collection practices.
Representative Plombon moved that Assembly Bill 290 be referred to the committee on Mandates.
The question was: Shall Assembly Bill
290 be referred to the committee on Mandates?
The roll was taken.
The result follows:
A764
Ayes - Representatives Baldus, Baldwin, Bell, Black, Bock, Coggs, Cullen, Dueholm, Hanson, Huber, Kreuser, Krug, Kunicki, La Fave, Meyer, Morris-Tatum, Notestein, Plache, Plombon, R. Potter, Riley, Robson, Rutkowski, Schneider, Springer, Turner, Vander Loop, Wilder, Williams, Wirch, L. Young, R. Young and Ziegelbauer - 33.
Noes - Representatives Ainsworth, Albers, Baumgart, Boyle, Brancel, Brandemuehl, Carpenter, Coleman, Dobyns, Duff, Foti, Freese, Gard, Goetsch, Green, Gronemus, Grothman, Gunderson, Hahn, Handrick, Harsdorf, Hasenohrl, Hoven, Hubler, Huebsch, Hutchison, Jensen, Johnsrud, Kaufert, Kelso, Klusman, Kreibich, Krusick, Ladwig, F. Lasee, Lazich, Lehman, Linton, Lorge, Murat, Musser, Nass, Olsen, Ott, Otte, Ourada, Owens, Porter, Powers, Reynolds, Schneiders, Seratti, Silbaugh, Skindrud, Travis, Underheim, Urban, Vrakas, Walker, Ward, Wasserman, Wood, Zukowski and Speaker Prosser - 64.
Absent or not voting - Representative Ryba - 1.
Motion failed.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 290 be adopted?
Motion carried.
Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 290 offered by Representative Skindrud.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 290 be adopted?
Motion carried.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 290 be adopted?
Motion carried.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 3 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 290 be adopted?
Motion carried.
Assembly amendment 4 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 290 offered by Representatives Otte and Baumgart.
Representative Skindrud moved that Assembly amendment 4 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 290 be laid on the table.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 4 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 290 be laid on the table?
The roll was taken.
The result follows:
Ayes - Representatives Ainsworth, Albers, Baldus, Brancel, Brandemuehl, Coleman, Dobyns, Duff, Foti, Freese, Gard, Goetsch, Green, Grothman, Gunderson, Hahn, Hanson, Harsdorf, Hoven, Huebsch, Hutchison, Jensen, Johnsrud, Kaufert, Kelso, Klusman, Kreibich, Krusick, La Fave, Ladwig, F. Lasee, Lazich, Morris-Tatum, Murat, Musser, Nass, Olsen, Ott, Owens, Plache, Plombon, Porter, Powers, Rutkowski, Schneiders, Seratti, Silbaugh, Skindrud, Springer, Underheim, Urban, Vrakas, Walker, Ward, Wasserman, Williams, Wood, Ziegelbauer, Zukowski and Speaker Prosser - 60.
Noes - Representatives Baldwin, Baumgart, Bell, Black, Bock, Boyle, Carpenter, Coggs, Cullen, Dueholm, Gronemus, Handrick, Hasenohrl, Huber, Hubler, Kreuser, Krug, Kunicki, Lehman, Linton, Lorge, Meyer, Notestein, Otte, Ourada, R. Potter, Reynolds, Riley, Robson, Schneider, Travis, Turner, Vander Loop, Wilder, Wirch, L. Young and R. Young - 37.
Absent or not voting - Representative Ryba - 1.
Motion carried.
Representative Morris-Tatum asked unanimous consent to be recorded as voting "No" on the previous question. Granted.
Assembly amendment 5 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 290 offered by Representative Johnsrud.
Representative Skindrud moved that Assembly amendment 5 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 290 be laid on the table.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 5 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 290 be laid on the table?
The roll was taken.
The result follows:
Ayes - Representatives Ainsworth, Albers, Brancel, Brandemuehl, Coleman, Dobyns, Duff, Foti, Gard, Green, Gronemus, Grothman, Hahn, Hanson, Harsdorf, Hoven, Huebsch, Hutchison, Jensen, Kaufert, Kelso, Klusman, Kreibich, Ladwig, F. Lasee, Lazich, Murat, Musser, Nass, Olsen, Ott, Owens, Plache, Porter, Powers, Schneiders, Silbaugh, Skindrud, Springer, Travis, Underheim, Urban, Vrakas, Walker, Ward, Wasserman, R. Young and Speaker Prosser - 48.
Noes - Representatives Baldus, Baldwin, Baumgart, Bell, Black, Bock, Boyle, Carpenter, Coggs, Cullen, Dueholm, Freese, Goetsch, Gunderson, Handrick, Hasenohrl, Huber, Hubler, Johnsrud, Kreuser, Krug, Krusick, Kunicki, La Fave, Lehman, Linton, Lorge, Meyer, Morris-Tatum, Notestein, Otte, Ourada, Plombon, R. Potter, Reynolds, Riley, Robson, Rutkowski, Schneider, Seratti, Turner, Vander Loop, Wilder, Williams, Wirch, Wood, L. Young, Ziegelbauer and Zukowski - 49.
Absent or not voting - Representative Ryba - 1.
Motion failed.
A765
Representative Skindrud moved rejection of Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 5 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 to
Assembly Bill
290.
Representative Skindrud asked unanimous consent that Assembly amendment 5 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 290 be placed after Assembly amendment 10 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 290 on calendar of Tuesday, January 23. Granted.
Assembly amendment 6 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 290 offered by Representative Skindrud.
Representative Skindrud asked unanimous consent that Assembly amendment 6 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 290 be withdrawn and returned to the author. Granted.
Assembly amendment 7 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 290 offered by Representatives Duff and Skindrud.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 7 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 290 be adopted?
Motion carried.
Assembly amendment 8 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 290 offered by Representatives Hanson, R. Young, Black, Baldwin and Travis.
Representative Skindrud moved that Assembly amendment 8 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 290 be laid on the table.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 8 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 290 be laid on the table.
Motion carried.
Assembly amendment 9 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 290 offered by Representative Kaufert.
Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 9 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 290 offered by Representatives Skindrud and Kaufert.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 9 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 290 be adopted?
Motion carried.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 9 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 290 be adopted?
Motion carried.
Assembly amendment 10 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 290 offered by Representatives R. Potter, Baumgart and Hanson.
