The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 2 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
Adopted.
Senate amendment 3 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senators Clausing, C. Potter, Jauch, Chvala, Moen, Andrea, Wineke and Shibilski.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 3 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
Senator Weeden moved that Senate amendment 3 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be laid on the table.
The question was: Shall Senate amendment 3 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be laid on the table?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 17; noes, 16; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Buettner, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Petak, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 17.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Andrea, Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Grobschmidt, Jauch, Moen, Moore, C. Potter, Risser, Shibilski and Wineke - 16.
Absent or not voting - None.
Tabled.
Senator Ellis, with unanimous consent, asked that the Senate recess until 4:21 P.M..
4:04 P.M.
__________________
RECESS
4:21 P.M.
The Senate reconvened.
__________________
in the chair
4:21 P.M.
Senator Rude in the chair.
Senate amendment 4 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senator Weeden.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 4 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
Adopted.
Senate amendment 5 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senators Decker and A. Lasee.
Senate amendment 6 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senator Wineke.
Senate amendment 7 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senators Andrea, Adelman, Clausing, C. Potter, Breske, Moen, Chvala, Grobschmidt, Panzer and Moore.
Senate amendment 8 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senators Decker, A. Lasee and Welch.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 5 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
Senator Decker, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate amendment 5 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be laid on the table.
Senator Decker, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate amendment 8 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be laid on the table.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 6 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
Senator Weeden moved that Senate amendment 6 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be laid on the table.
The question was: Shall Senate amendment 6 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be laid on the table?
Tabled.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 7 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
__________________
in the chair
4:43 P.M.
Senator Lasee in the chair.
Senator Zien moved rejection of Senate amendment 7 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565.
The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 7 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 17; noes, 16; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Buettner, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Petak, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 17.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Andrea, Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Grobschmidt, Jauch, Moen, Moore, C. Potter, Risser, Shibilski and Wineke - 16.
Absent or not voting - None.
Rejected.
Senate amendment 9 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senators Chvala, Moen and Shibilski.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 9 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
Senator Weeden moved that Senate amendment 9 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be laid on the table.
The question was: Shall Senate amendment 9 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be laid on the table?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 17; noes, 16; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Buettner, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Petak, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 17.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Andrea, Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Grobschmidt, Jauch, Moen, Moore, C. Potter, Risser, Shibilski and Wineke - 16.
Absent or not voting - None.
Tabled.
Senate amendment 10 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senators Jauch, Andrea and Shibilski.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 10 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
S722 Senate amendment 1 to Senate amendment 10 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senator Jauch.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate amendment 10 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
Adopted.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 10 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
Senator Weeden moved that Senate amendment 10 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be laid on the table.
The question was: Shall Senate amendment 10 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be laid on the table?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 17; noes, 16; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Buettner, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Petak, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 17.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Andrea, Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Grobschmidt, Jauch, Moen, Moore, C. Potter, Risser, Shibilski and Wineke - 16.
Absent or not voting - None.
Tabled.
Senate amendment 11 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senator Wineke.
Senate amendment 12 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senators Decker, A. Lasee and Welch.
Senate amendment 13 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senators George, Moore and Burke.
Senate amendment 14 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senator Panzer.
Senate amendment 15 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senator Wineke.
Senate amendment 16 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senator Wineke.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 11 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
Senator Wineke, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate amendment 11 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be laid on the table.
Senator Wineke, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate amendment 15 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be laid on the table.
Senator Wineke, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate amendment 16 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be laid on the table.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 12 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
Adopted.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 13 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
Senator Weeden moved that Senate amendment 13 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be laid on the table.
The question was: Shall Senate amendment 13 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be laid on the table?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 17; noes, 16; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Buettner, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Petak, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 17.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Andrea, Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Grobschmidt, Jauch, Moen, Moore, C. Potter, Risser, Shibilski and Wineke - 16.
Absent or not voting - None.
Tabled.
Loading...
Loading...