This bill changes the name of DOD to the department of commerce on July 1,
1996.
Correctional system
Adult correctional system
Prison industries
Under current law, the department of corrections (DOC) administers a prison
industries program for the employment of inmates. This bill permits DOC to lease
space within prisons, or within correctional institutions for children, to not more
than 3 private businesses to employ inmates or residents to manufacture products
or components or provide services for sale on the open market. Before any such
business begins, the joint committee on finance (JCF) must hold an informational
hearing and the prison industries board must approve the business. The private
business may not be run as a prison industry, except in regard to payment and
disposition of wages, eligibility of employes for worker's compensation benefits and
the authority of DOC to maintain security and control in its institutions. The private
business would not be subject to provisions that require adherence to state
purchasing requirements, such as the general requirement to purchase from the
lowest responsible bidder; prohibit the sale of many products in the open market;
require the sale of products by prison industries sales personnel; and include all the
industries in a manufacturing and marketing plan and a separate accounting
system.
Current law prohibits the sale in the open market of most goods made by state,
city or county prisoners. Current exceptions apply for items such as farm machinery,
implements and tools. This bill authorizes the sale, in the open market, of
by-products of mattresses and by-products of paint from prison industries recycling
operations. The bill also authorizes tax-supported institutions and nonprofit
agencies to sell, on the open market, products manufactured by inmates of any state
penal institution as part of a hobby-craft program or vocational training.
Currently, DOC administers the prison industries program only in state
prisons. This bill allows DOC to operate prison industries in any DOC correctional
institution for children.
Under current law, state agencies generally must pay interest when they
receive property or services and have a balance due after 31 days. One exception to
this requirement involves situations in which an order or contract is between 2 or
more state agencies. This bill removes the exception if the order or contract involves
prison industries. Thus, in that situation, interest must be paid.
Other adult correctional system
Under current law, DOC has general authority to enter into contracts to
purchase care and services from public or private agencies. This bill specifically
permits DOC to contract with public or private vendors to provide for the supervision
of probationers and parolees who are under minimum or administrative supervision.
These are probationers and parolees who need only infrequent face-to-face contacts
with a probation and parole agent or other representative of DOC. The contract must
authorize any such vendor to charge a fee to the supervised probationers and
parolees.
Under current law, DOC charges and collects fees for certain services that it
provides. This bill requires DOC to charge and collect a fee of $1 per day from
probationers and parolees. A probationer or parolee is exempt from the fee while he
or she is unemployed, in school on a full-time basis, undergoing treatment or unable
to work for medical reasons.
Under current law, if an inmate earns wages and receives medical or dental
services, DOC may require him or her to pay a deductible, coinsurance, copayment
or similar charge upon the services that the inmate receives. This bill requires DOC
to assess the inmate for the deductible, coinsurance, copayment or similar charge if
the inmate requests the services. DOC must charge at least $2.50 for each request.
These provisions are subject to DOC's current authority to waive liability based on
inability to pay.
Under current law, counties are generally responsible for the costs associated
with prisoners in county jails. However, DOC must pay counties for certain costs
relating to the maintenance of a person held, pursuant to a departmental hold order,
in a county jail pending the disposition of his or her parole or probation revocation
proceedings. Counties receive $40 per prisoner per day subject to various
restrictions. In addition, DOC must pay $500,000 in each fiscal year to any county
that had 12,000 or more reimbursable days in the prior fiscal year. This bill requires
that payment to be made to a county with 18,000 or more reimbursable days in a
fiscal year.
Under current law, DOC may not expand the Green Bay Correctional
Institution beyond the institution's walls. This bill permits DOC to expand beyond
the walls on the west and north sides of the institution.
Juvenile correctional system
Under current law, the department of health and social services (DHSS)
operates the juvenile secured correctional facilities known as the Ethan Allen School
and the Lincoln Hills School. Those facilities are used for the placement of children
who have been adjudicated delinquent and placed in one of those facilities under the
supervision of DHSS. Under current law, effective December 1, 1995, DOC will
administer a youthful offender program for children who have been adjudicated
delinquent and ordered to participate in that program. Current law authorizes DOC,
effective December 1, 1995, to operate juvenile secured correctional facilities for the
placement of youthful offender program participants. This bill transfers from DHSS
to DOC, effective July 1, 1996, the Ethan Allen School and the Lincoln Hills School.
Under current law relating to community youth and family aids (generally
referred to as "youth aids"), various state and federal funds are allocated to counties
to pay for state-provided correctional services and local delinquency-related and
juvenile justice services. DHSS charges counties for the costs of services provided
by DHSS. Under current law, youth aids may not be used for children who are placed
in correctional institutions on the basis of having committed certain violent offenses.
Under current law, the cost of care for these children is paid at a specified per person
daily reimbursement rate from general purpose revenue moneys appropriated to
DHSS. Because under this bill, those children may be placed in the serious juvenile
offender program administered by DOC, the bill eliminates payment for those
children from general purpose revenues appropriated to DHSS effective July 1, 1996.
The bill also provides the amount of youth aids funds allocated to counties for
the 1995-97 state fiscal biennium and provides new per-person daily cost
assessments upon counties for juvenile placements during the 1995-97 biennium as
follows:
-
See PDF for table 
The bill requires DHSS to submit to the secretary of administration and the
cochairpersons of the joint committee on finance (JCF) proposed rates to counties for
maintaining a child in a juvenile correctional institution during the 1996-97 fiscal
year and requires the secretary, if he or she approves of those rates, to submit
proposed legislation providing for those rates to the cochairpersons of JCF.
The bill requires DHSS to evaluate the formula used by DHSS to allocate youth
aids to counties in light of any changes in the number of children placed under the
supervision of DHSS as a result of amendments in the law made by this bill and to
submit to the secretary of administration and the cochairpersons of JCF a proposed
youth aids formula that reflects that change. If the secretary approves that formula,
he or she must include it in the 1997-99 budget compilation.
Under current law, DHSS must adjust the per-person daily cost assessment
upon counties for state-provided juvenile correctional services at least annually. If
there is an increase in the assessment, DHSS must increase the funds available to
counties to cover that increase. This bill eliminates the requirements that DHSS
adjust that assessment annually and provide funding to cover any increase in that
assessment.
Under current law, a county department of human services or social services
may provide an intensive supervision program, consisting of intensive surveillance
and community-based treatment services, for children who have been adjudicated
delinquent and ordered to participate in an intensive supervision program. This bill
eliminates the authority of county departments to provide intensive supervision
programs.
Current law provides an intensive aftercare program for children who have
been released from secured correctional facilities, child-caring institutions and
secure alcohol and other drug abuse treatment programs with the aim of reducing
recidivism by determining what types and levels of intensity of services are effective
for reducing recidivism for children on aftercare. This bill eliminates that program.
Under current law, DOC may enter into contracts with counties to have DOC
provide electronic monitoring for certain children who have been ordered by a
juvenile court to be subject to electronic monitoring. Currently, children may not be
assessed a fee for these services. This bill broadens DOC's authority, allowing DOC
to enter into a contract with a county social services department or DHSS so that
DOC can provide electronic monitoring services for any child who is in the custody
or under the supervision of the county department or DHSS. DOC charges fees for
the services that it provides. Under a placement agreement, the child or the child's
parent or guardian may be charged a fee for these services.
This bill permits moneys received as payments in restitution of property that
is damaged at a juvenile secured correctional facility, moneys received from the sale
of surplus property from a juvenile secured correctional facility and moneys received
for miscellaneous services provided at a juvenile secured correctional facility to be
used for the repair or replacement of property damaged at the facility and for the
provision of those miscellaneous services.
Courts and procedure
Circuit courts
Under current law, the director of state courts reimburses counties for the costs
of guardians ad litem, who are appointed by courts to represent the interests of
children or incompetent persons. If the state moneys appropriated are insufficient,
the county payments are prorated. This bill eliminates that reimbursement program
and allows counties to include those costs in the court costs that are eligible for state
reimbursement under current circuit court support grants.
The court support payment program is currently funded by a $20 court support
services fee that is assessed to litigants. This bill raises that fee to $40.
This bill requires a county board to provide one judicial assistant for every 3
circuit judges in counties with 3 or more circuit court branches to assist the judges
with clerical and administrative duties. Under current law, the costs of the judicial
assistants are included in those court costs that are eligible for state reimbursement
under the circuit court support grants.
Under current law, the fees collected by the clerk of circuit court for most civil
actions are increased for the period from September 1, 1989, to December 31, 1995.
This bill removes the expiration date of December 31, 1995, for the increased fees.
Under current law, funding to reimburse Milwaukee County for the costs of
operating a drug court in Milwaukee expires June 30, 1995. This bill changes that
expiration date to June 30, 1997.
Under current law, each circuit judge is responsible for appointing a court
reporter to serve in the branch of that circuit judge. This bill instead requires the
chief judge of the judicial administrative district, in cooperation with the district
court administrator, to appoint, assign and supervise the court reporters serving the
circuit courts within that judicial administrative district.
Under current law, in civil cases, traffic cases, municipal court actions to impose
civil monetary forfeitures and small claims actions if a jury is requested, the jury
consists of 6 persons. In certain cases, including traffic cases and forfeiture actions,
a party to the action may request a greater number of jurors, not to exceed 12 persons.
This bill limits the number of jurors to 6 persons in cases involving traffic
regulations.
Under current law, a circuit court fee of $10 collected by each county for filing
a petition requesting child or family support or maintenance is used to fund the
county's cost of administering the child and spousal support and paternity program.
Under this bill, the fee is used for court services related to the filing of a petition for
support or maintenance.
Under current law, a court reporter receives a fee for making a transcript of the
court record of $1.50 for a 25-line page for the original and 50 cents for a duplicate
page. The fee generally is paid by the county. If the state public defender (SPD)
represents the defendant, the state pays the fee. If another party to an action
requests a transcript, the party pays the court reporter a fee of $1.75 for a 25-line
page for the original and 60 cents for a duplicate page.
This bill allows a court reporter to collect these transcript fees after June 30,
1995, only if the transcript is produced on computer-aided transcription equipment
owned by the court reporter and purchased before January 1, 1995. The bill
eliminates all court reporter fees after June 30, 1997.
Other courts and procedure
Under current law, certain proceedings in a criminal case may be conducted by
telephone or live audiovisual means, if available. Some of these proceedings may be
conducted by telephone or live audiovisual means only with the consent of the
defendant. This bill eliminates the requirement for the defendant's consent. Under
the bill, either party may request that the proceedings be conducted by telephone or
live audiovisual means. The court may then permit the proceedings to be conducted
by telephone or live audiovisual means unless the opposing party shows good cause
for not doing so.
Under current law, in antitrust actions, the court may award private parties,
but not the department of justice (DOJ), the costs of a suit, including reasonable
attorney fees. The costs must be paid by the losing party. In pollution discharge
actions, the court may award DOJ the costs of any investigation and monitoring
related to a prosecution. Current law does not give the court authority to provide any
similar awards to DOJ in consumer protection, medical assistance fraud and
environmental protection actions.
This bill permits the court, in consumer protection, environmental protection,
medical assistance fraud and pollution discharge actions, to award DOJ an amount
reasonably necessary to remedy the harmful effects of the violation, the costs of the
suit, including attorney fees and the expenses of investigation and prosecution.
Under current law, the judicial commission, composed of 5 nonlawyers
appointed by the governor with the consent of the senate and 2 judges and 2 state
bar members appointed by the supreme court, investigates any misconduct or
permanent disability of a judge or court commissioner. The supreme court reviews
the actions of the commission and determines the appropriate discipline or action to
take in response to the commission's investigation.
Under current law, the judicial council studies the rules of practice and
procedure in the courts and the organization and methods of operation of the courts.
The judicial council recommends changes in court practice and procedure to the
legislature and to the supreme court and advises the supreme court in the
promulgation of rules that regulate pleadings, practice and procedure in judicial
proceedings.
This bill retains both the judicial commission and the judicial council but
abolishes the executive secretary of and clerical support for the judicial council.
Under the bill, the judicial commission provides staff services to the judicial council.
This bill provides immunity from civil liability for property damage if the
person causing the damage was acting in good faith in containing and stabilizing a
discharge of oil into any navigable waterway and was under the direction of a state
or federal hazardous substance contingency plan, a federal on-scene coordinator or
the secretary of natural resources. This immunity does not apply to a person who
possesses or controls the oil which is discharged, who causes the discharge of the oil
or whose act or omission involves reckless, wanton or intentional misconduct.
Public defender
Under current law, the SPD may seek payment for legal services provided to
persons who are indigent in part, from the parents of children for whom the SPD
provides legal counsel who are not indigent or who are indigent in part and from
persons who have been represented by the SPD and whose financial circumstances
improve.
Under this bill, the SPD must establish a system to verify the income, assets
and expenses of the persons seeking representation, to make redeterminations of
indigency during the course of representation and to collect payments from persons
who have been provided counsel. The bill authorizes the SPD to gain access to, and
to receive copies of, the income tax returns of its clients from whom the SPD seeks
payment for legal representation.
Under current law, if an indigent person is the respondent in a paternity action
and the petitioner is represented by the district attorney, corporation counsel,
attorney responsible for support enforcement or some other state or county attorney,
the indigent person is entitled to state-paid legal counsel under the SPD program
on the issues of paternity determination and initial child support establishment.
The legal services provided by SPD end, however, if during the paternity proceeding
the results of blood tests show that the respondent is excluded as the father or that
the statistical probability of the respondent being the father is 99.0% or higher. This
bill eliminates entirely the entitlement of an indigent respondent in a paternity
action to state-paid legal services provided by SPD.
Under a decision by the Wisconsin court of appeals, which the Wisconsin
supreme court refused to review and thus upheld, an indigent person is entitled to
representation by the SPD in an action for contempt of court that is brought by the
state because the person, if found in contempt, may be incarcerated.
Brotzman v.
Brotzman, 91 Wis. 2d 335 (1979). This bill provides that the SPD may not provide
legal representation to a person who is subject to a contempt of court proceeding for
failure to pay child or family support if the matter is not brought by the state or if
the judge or family court commissioner hearing the matter certifies to the SPD that
the person will not be incarcerated if found in contempt.
Under current law, the SPD may provide legal representation on behalf of an
indigent person in a case attacking the conditions of the person's confinement, if the
SPD believes the case should be pursued. This bill eliminates this authority.
Current law provides caseload standards that a staff attorney in the SPD trial
division is expected to handle. This bill increases those standards for felony cases
from 166.8 to 184.5 per year, for misdemeanor cases from 410.9 to 492 per year and
for juvenile cases from 228.4 to 246 per year.
Current law reduces the caseload standards of 12 SPD staff attorneys to 50%
of the full caseload standards imposed by law and requires them to perform
supervisory duties. This bill repeals this provision.
Under current law, the SPD assigns some cases to staff attorneys and some
cases to private local attorneys. In each county, the SPD creates a list of qualified
private local attorneys for each type of case handled. Generally, the SPD assigns
cases in order according to the applicable list. An attorney may not be excluded from
a list unless the SPD states in writing the reasons for the exclusion. This bill allows
the SPD to assign cases to a private local attorney, without regard to the lists, for
reasons related to that attorney's performance.
Under current law, a private local attorney who receives an assignment from
the SPD generally receives $50 per hour for time spent in court, $40 per hour for time
spent out of court, excluding travel, and $25 per hour for travel in certain situations.
The SPD may also enter into annual contracts with private local attorneys to handle
vehicle-related cases and to pay those attorneys an amount set in the contract that
does not exceed the previously described rates. This bill authorizes such contracts
in all cases, requires the SPD to enter into as many of these contracts as possible,
allows the contracts to be made with attorneys or law firms and requires that the
contracts set a fixed-fee total amount (subject to the hourly rate limits).
Current law requires that a prosecutor make available to a person charged with
a crime certain information, such as statements of witnesses, police reports and
reports of scientific testing, that the prosecutor has in his or her possession. This bill
requires the SPD to pay any fee charged for photocopying any such items made
available to a person charged with a crime if the SPD or a private attorney appointed
by the SPD represents the person. The fee that the SPD may be charged for
photocopies may not exceed the actual, necessary and direct cost of photocopying.
