(a) I, ...., the testator, sign my name to this instrument this .... day of ...., and being first duly sworn, declare to the undersigned authority all of the following:
1. I execute this instrument as my will.
2. I sign this will willingly, or willingly direct another to sign for me.
3. I execute this will as my free and voluntary act for the purposes expressed therein.
4. I am 18 years of age or older, of sound mind and under no constraint or undue influence.
Testator: ....
(b) We, ...., ...., the witnesses, being first duly sworn, sign our names to this instrument and declare to the undersigned authority all of the following:
1. The testator executes this instrument as his or her will.
2. The testator signs it willingly, or willingly directs another to sign for him or her.
3. Each of us, in the conscious presence of the testator, signs this will as a witness.
4. To the best of our knowledge, the testator is 18 years of age or older, of sound mind and under no constraint or undue influence.
Witness: ....
Witness: ....
State of ....
County of ....
(c) Subscribed and sworn to before me by ...., the testator, and by ...., and ...., witnesses, this .... day of ....,
.....
(Seal) ....
(Signed): ....
(Official capacity of officer): ....
(2) Two-step procedure. An attested will may be made self-proved at any time after its execution by the affidavit of the testator and witnesses. The affidavit must be made before an officer authorized to administer oaths under the laws of the state in which the affidavit occurs and must be evidenced by the officer's certificate, under official seal, attached or annexed to the will in substantially the following form:
State of ....
County of ....
(a) We, ...., ...., and ...., the testator and the witnesses whose names are signed to the foregoing instrument, being first duly sworn, do declare to the undersigned authority all of the following:
1. The testator executed the instrument as his or her will.
2. The testator signed willingly, or willingly directed another to sign for him or her.
3. The testator executed the will as a free and voluntary act.
4. Each of the witnesses, in the conscious presence of the testator, signed the will as witness.
5. To the best of the knowledge of each witness, the testator was, at the time of execution, 18 years of age or older, of sound mind and under no constraint or undue influence.
Testator: ....
Witness: ....
Witness: ....
(b) Subscribed and sworn to before me by ...., the testator, and by ...., and ...., witnesses, this .... day of ....,
.....
(Seal) ....
(Signed): ....
(Official capacity of officer): ....
(3) Effect of affidavit. (a) A signature affixed to a self-proving affidavit attached to a will is considered a signature affixed to the will, if necessary to prove the due execution of the will.
(b) Inclusion in a will of an affidavit in substantially the form under sub. (1) or (2) is conclusive evidence that the will was executed in compliance with s. 853.03.
188,130
Section 130
. 853.05 of the statutes is repealed and recreated to read:
853.05 Execution of wills outside the state or by nonresidents within this state. (1) A will is validly executed if it is in writing and any of the following applies:
(a) The will is executed according to s. 853.03.
(b) The will is executed in accordance with the law, at the time of execution or at the time of death, of any of the following:
1. The place where the will was executed.
2. The place where the testator resided, was domiciled or was a national at the time of execution.
3. The place where the testator resided, was domiciled or was a national at the time of death.
(2) Any will under sub. (1) (b) has the same effect as if executed in this state in compliance with s. 853.03.
188,131c
Section 131c. 853.07 (2) of the statutes is renumbered 853.07 (2) (a) and amended to read:
853.07 (2) (a) A Subject to pars. (b) and (c), a will is not invalidated because it is signed by an interested witness; but, unless the will is also signed by 2 disinterested witnesses.
(b) Except as provided in par. (c), any beneficial provisions of the will for a witness or the spouse of the a witness are invalid to the extent that such provisions in the aggregate exceed in value the aggregate value of those provisions exceeds what the witness or spouse would have received had the testator died intestate. Valuation is to be made as of testator's death.
188,131m
Section 131m. 853.07 (2) (c) of the statutes is created to read:
853.07 (2) (c) Paragraph (b) does not apply if any of the following applies:
1. The will is also signed by 2 disinterested witnesses.
2. There is sufficient evidence that the testator intended the full transfer to take effect.
188,133
Section 133
. 853.11 (1) (title) of the statutes is amended to read:
853.11 (1) (title) Subsequent Revocation by writing or physical act.
188,134
Section 134
. 853.11 (1) (intro.) and (a) of the statutes are consolidated, renumbered 853.11 (1) (a) and amended to read:
853.11 (1) (a) A will is revoked in whole or in part by: (a) A a subsequent will, codicil or other instrument which that is executed in compliance with s. 853.03 or 853.05 and which that revokes the prior will or a part thereof expressly or by inconsistency; or.
188,135
Section 135
. 853.11 (1) (b) of the statutes is renumbered 853.11 (1m) and amended to read:
853.11 (1m) (title) Revocation by physical act. Burning A will is revoked in whole or in part by burning, tearing, canceling or, obliterating
or destroying the will, or part, with the intent to revoke, by the testator or by some person in the testator's conscious presence and by the testator's direction.
188,136
Section 136
. 853.11 (1) (bm) of the statutes is created to read:
853.11 (1) (bm) 1. A subsequent will wholly revokes the prior will if the testator intended the subsequent will to replace rather than supplement the prior will, regardless of whether the subsequent will expressly revokes the prior will.
2. The testator is presumed to have intended a subsequent will to replace, rather than supplement, the prior will if the subsequent will completely disposes of the testator's estate. If this presumption arises and is not rebutted by clear and convincing evidence, the prior will is revoked.
3. The testator is presumed to have intended a subsequent will to supplement, rather than replace, the prior will if the subsequent will does not completely dispose of the testator's estate. If this presumption arises and is not rebutted by clear and convincing evidence, the subsequent will revokes the prior will only to the extent of any inconsistency.
188,137
Section 137
. 853.11 (2) of the statutes is repealed and recreated to read:
853.11 (2) Premarital will. (a) Entitlement of surviving spouse. Subject to par. (c), if the testator married the surviving spouse after the testator executed his or her will, the surviving spouse is entitled to a share of the probate estate.
(b) Value of share. The value of the share under par. (a) is the value of the share that the surviving spouse would have received had the testator died with an intestate estate equal to the value of the net estate of the decedent less the value of all of the following:
1. All devises to or for the benefit of the testator's children who were born before the marriage to the surviving spouse and who are not also the children of the surviving spouse.
2. All devises to or for the benefit of the issue of a child described in subd. 1.
3. All devises that pass under s. 854.06, 854.07, 854.21 or 854.22 to or for the benefit of children described in subd. 1. or issue of those children.
(c) Exceptions. Paragraph (a) does not apply if any of the following applies:
1. It appears from the will or other evidence that the will was made in contemplation of the testator's marriage to the surviving spouse.
2. It appears from the will or other evidence that the will is intended to be effective notwithstanding any subsequent marriage, or there is sufficient evidence that the testator considered revising the will after marriage but decided not to.
3. The testator provided for the spouse by transfer outside the will and the intent that the transfer be in lieu of a testamentary provision is shown by the testator's statements or is reasonably inferred from the amount of the transfer or other evidence.
4. The testator and the spouse have entered into an agreement that complies with ch. 766 and that provides for the spouse or specifies that the spouse is to have no rights in the testator's estate.
(d) Priority and abatement. In satisfying the share provided by this subsection:
1. Amounts received by the surviving spouse under s. 861.02 and devises made by will to the surviving spouse are applied first.
2. Devises other than those described in par. (b) 1. to 3. abate as provided under s. 854.18.
188,138
Section 138
. 853.11 (3) of the statutes is repealed and recreated to read:
853.11 (3) Former spouse. The effect of a transfer under a will to a former spouse is governed by s. 854.15.
188,139
Section 139
. 853.11 (3m) of the statutes is repealed and recreated to read:
853.11 (3m) Intentional killing of decedent by beneficiary. If a beneficiary under a will killed the decedent, the rights of that beneficiary are governed by s. 854.14.
188,140
Section 140
. 853.11 (6) of the statutes is repealed and recreated to read:
853.11 (6) Revival of revoked will. (a) If a subsequent will that partly revoked a previous will is itself revoked by a revocatory act under sub. (1m), the revoked part of the previous will is revived. This paragraph does not apply if it is evident from the circumstances of the revocation of the subsequent will or from the testator's contemporary or subsequent declarations that the testator did not intend the revoked part of the previous will to take effect as executed.
(b) If a subsequent will that wholly revoked a previous will is itself revoked by a revocatory act under sub. (1m), the previous will remains revoked unless it is revived. The previous will is revived if it is evident from the circumstances of the revocation of the subsequent will or from the testator's contemporary or subsequent declarations that the testator intended the previous will to take effect as executed.
(c) If a subsequent will that wholly or partly revoked a previous will is itself revoked by another, later will, the previous will or its revoked part remains revoked, unless it or its revoked part is revived. The previous will or its revoked part is revived to the extent that it appears from the terms of the later will, or from the testator's contemporary or subsequent declarations, that the testator intended the previous will to take effect.
(d) In the absence of an original valid will, establishment of the execution and validity of the revived will or part is governed by s. 856.17.
188,141
Section 141
. 853.13 of the statutes is repealed and recreated to read:
853.13 Contracts. (1) A contract to make a will or devise, not to revoke a will or devise or to die intestate may be established only by any of the following:
(a) Provisions of a will stating the material provisions of the contract.
(b) An express reference in a will to a contract and extrinsic evidence proving the terms of the contract.