Read a third time and passed.
Senator Chvala, with unanimous consent, asked that all action be immediately messaged to the Assembly.
Senate Bill 166
Relating to: calculation of interest expense of affiliated entities under medical assistance.
Read a second time.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Moen, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Senate Bill 166
Read a third time.
The ayes and noes were required and the vote was: ayes, 25; noes, 7; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Darling, Decker, Farrow, George, Grobschmidt, Huelsman, Jauch, Moen, Moore, Panzer, Plache, C. Potter, Risser, Roessler, Rosenzweig, Rude, Shibilski, Welch, Wineke, Wirch and Zien - 25.
Noes - Senators Cowles, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Fitzgerald, A. Lasee, Schultz and Weeden - 7.
Absent or not voting - None.
Passed.
Senate Bill 181
Relating to: establishment of species harvest limits and allotment of individual licensee catch quotas among holders of commercial fishing licenses and granting rule-making authority.
Read a second time.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate Bill 181?
Adopted.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Chvala, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Senate Bill 181
Read a third time and passed.
Senate Bill 200
Relating to: stationery utilized by state agencies for outside correspondence.
Read a second time.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate Bill 200?
Adopted.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Chvala, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Senate Bill 200
Read a third time and passed.
Senate Bill 225
Relating to: the use of original manufacturer replacement parts.
Read a second time.
Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 225 offered by Senators Rude, Panzer, Zien, Huelsman and Farrow.
Senator Chvala moved rejection of Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 225.
The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 225?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 18; noes, 14; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Grobschmidt, Jauch, Moen, Moore, Plache, C. Potter, Risser, Roessler, Shibilski, Welch, Wineke and Wirch - 18.
Noes - Senators Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden and Zien - 14.
Absent or not voting - None.
Rejected.
Senate amendment 2 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 225 offered by Senators Rude and Drzewiecki.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 2 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 225?
Senator Chvala moved rejection of Senate amendment 2 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 225.
The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 2 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 225?
Rejection refused.
Senator Chvala moved that Senate amendment 2 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill
225 be laid on the table.
The question was: Shall Senate amendment 2 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill
225 be laid on the table?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 12; noes, 20; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Grobschmidt, Jauch, Moen, Moore, Plache, C. Potter and Risser - 12.
Noes - Senators Breske, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Roessler, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Shibilski, Weeden, Welch, Wineke, Wirch and Zien - 20.
Absent or not voting - None.
Tabling refused.
Senator Shibilski,with unanimous consent, asked that the journal show he would liked to have voted no on the motion by which Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 was rejected.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 2 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 225?
Adopted.
S505
Senate amendment 3 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 225 offered by Senator Drzewiecki.
Senator Shibilski moved reconsideration of the vote by which Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 was rejected.
Senator Drzewiecki, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate amendment 3 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 225 be withdrawn and returned to author.
__________________
Senator Plache, with unanimous consent, asked that the Senate recess until 1:55 P.M..
1:40 P.M.
__________________
1:55 P.M.
The Senate reconvened.
Senator Risser in the chair.
__________________
The question was: Shall the vote by which Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate
Bill 225 was rejected be reconsidered?
Reconsideration Refused.
The question was: Adoption of Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 225?
Adopted.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Chvala, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Senate Bill 225
Read a third time and passed.
Senate Bill 227
Relating to: requiring headlights and other required lamps on vehicles to be lighted while windshield wipers are being used.
Read a second time.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate Bill 227?
Adopted.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Chvala, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Senate Bill 227
Read a third time.
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 24; noes, 8; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Fitzgerald, George, Grobschmidt, Jauch, A. Lasee, Moen, Moore, Panzer, Plache, C. Potter, Risser, Roessler, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Wirch and Zien - 24.
