Under current law, a child welfare agency that provides care and maintenance
for children must pay a biennial license fee of $100, plus $15 per child, based on
licensed capacity. This bill raises that fee to $110, plus $16.50 per child, based on
licensed capacity, beginning on the day on which the bill becomes law, and to $121,
plus $18.15 per child, based on licensed capacity, beginning on July 1, 1998.
Under current law, a child welfare agency that places children in foster homes
or group homes must pay a biennial license fee of $210. This bill raises that fee to
$231, beginning on the day on which the bill becomes law, and to $254.10, beginning
on July 1, 1998.
Under current law, a group home must pay a biennial license fee of $100, plus
$15 per child, based on licensed capacity. This bill raises that fee to $110, plus $16.50
per child, based on licensed capacity, beginning on the day on which the bill becomes
law, and to $121, plus $18.15 per child, based on licensed capacity, beginning on July
1, 1998.
Under current law, a day care center that provides care and supervision for 4
to 8 children must pay a biennial license fee of $50. This bill raises that fee to $55,
beginning on the day on which the bill becomes law, and to $60.50, beginning on July
1, 1998.
Under current law, a day care center that provides care and supervision for 9
or more children must pay a biennial license fee of $25, plus $7 per child, based on
licensed capacity. This bill raises that fee to $27.50, plus $7.70 per child, based on
licensed capacity, beginning on the day on which the bill becomes law, and to $30.25,
plus $8.47 per child, based on licensed capacity, beginning on July 1, 1998.
Under current law, a shelter care facility must pay a biennial license fee of $50,
plus $15 per juvenile, based on licensed capacity. This bill raises that fee to $55, plus
$16.50 per juvenile, based on licensed capacity, beginning on the day on which the
bill becomes law, and to $60.50, plus $18.15 per juvenile, based on licensed capacity,
beginning on July 1, 1998.
Under current law, the state receives federal foster care and adoption
assistance funding under Title IV-E of the federal social security act (generally
referred to as "IV-E funds") in reimbursement of moneys expended by the state or
the counties for activities relating to foster care and adoption of children. Currently,
IV-E funds are credited to the community aids appropriation account of DHFS and
distributed to counties to provide social services to children and families. Currently,
subject to certain exceptions, community aids moneys, including IV-E funds, that
are not spent or encumbered by December 31 of each year lapse to the general fund.
One of those exceptions permits DHFS to carry forward to the next year up to 3% of
the community aids funds allocated to a county in the current year.
This bill permits DHFS to distribute IV-E funds not only for services and
projects to assist children and families, but also for the operational requirements of
DHFS in administering programs to assist children and families. The bill also
provides that if, on December 31 of any year, there remains unspent or
unencumbered in the community aids allocation an amount that exceeds the amount
of IV-E funds allocated as community aids in that year ("excess moneys"), DHFS
must carry forward to the next year the excess moneys and distribute not less than
50% of the excess moneys to counties having a population of less than 500,000 for
services and projects to assist children and families. Under the bill, a county must
use not less than 50% of any excess moneys received by that county for services for
children who are at risk of abuse or neglect to prevent the need for child abuse and
neglect intervention services. A county may not use those excess moneys to supplant
any other moneys expended by the county for services and projects to assist children
and families in a base year determined by DHFS. Any excess moneys carried forward
by DHFS, but not distributed to counties, may be used for the operational
requirements of DHFS in administering programs for children and families.
Under current law, DHFS may establish a system of outpatient clinic services
in any mental health institute operated by DHFS. Currently, subject to certain
exceptions, DHFS may provide those outpatient services only to a patient contracted
for with a county department of community programs or developmental disabilities
services. This bill permits DHFS to provide outpatient services at the Winnebago
Mental Health Institute to a patient who is a pupil enrolled in a school district that
contracts with DHFS for the provision of those services.
Mental illness and developmental disabilities
Under current law, persons who receive treatment for mental illness,
developmental disabilities, alcoholism or drug dependency have the right to refuse
medication or treatment, except that this right does not apply to any of the following:
1. Certain persons who are detained or committed on the basis of mental illness
and certain incapability, lack of services and probability of suffering severe harm
(commonly known as the "5th standard" for mental health detention or
commitment).
2. Persons who a court has determined are incompetent to refuse medication
or treatment, either at or after the hearing to determine probable cause for
commitment or after a final commitment order.
3. Committed persons in a situation in which the medication or treatment is
necessary to prevent serious physical harm to the persons or others.
4. Persons who are found by a court to be both incompetent and incompetent
to refuse psychotropic medication and for whom guardians of the person have been
appointed to consent to or refuse psychotropic medication, including forcible
administration of psychotropic medication, on behalf of the persons.
5. Persons ordered by a court to take medication in order to maintain their
competence to proceed at trial.
This bill substantially modifies the right of patients receiving services for
mental illness, developmental disabilities, alcoholism or drug dependency to refuse
medication or treatment. First, for a patient who has been found by a court to be
incompetent to refuse medication or treatment, the bill establishes, as a standard,
that the medication or treatment may be involuntarily administered if the facility
staff who are primarily responsible for developing the patient's treatment plan
determine that the medication or treatment is appropriate for the purpose of
ameliorating the patient's condition and represents the exercise of treatment
techniques and procedures that are reasonable and appropriate to the patient and
that there would be a current risk of harm to the patient or others if not administered.
Second, for a patient who has not been found by a court to be incompetent to refuse
medication or treatment, the bill establishes the right to request review of the offered
medication or treatment. The review must be conducted by a 3-member panel of
treatment professionals. If the review panel determines that the offered medication
or treatment is appropriate for the purpose of ameliorating the patient's condition
and represents the exercise of treatment techniques and procedures that are
reasonable and appropriate to the patient, or if the patient did not timely request
panel review, the patient's treatment facility or treatment program may, for certain
patients, terminate the contractual agreement with the county department of
community programs or developmental disabilities services and return the patient
to the care and custody of the county department, request reexamination of the
patient or discharge the patient. For all mental health patients, the treatment
facility may transfer the patient to a nontreatment unit or facility until the patient
is released or discharged or consents to the medication or treatment that is offered
under a treatment plan. Patients who are transferred to a nontreatment unit or
facility may be locked in their rooms for certain periods of time and may be subjected
to unit-wide or facility-wide isolation under certain circumstances. These patients
are not entitled to conditions or facilities that are identical or substantially similar
to those in which patients who consent to treatment are housed. The rights under
transfers concerning a form of treatment that is least restrictive of the patient's
personal liberty do not apply to these patients. The bill also authorizes a person
operating a mental health institute or other inpatient facility to establish and
operate nontreatment units or facilities. Lastly, for all patients, the treatment
facility or treatment program may file a motion to request the court to enter an order
requiring administration to the patient of treatment (not including the
administration of psychotropic medication).
Under current state law, treatment records of an individual who is receiving or
has received services for mental illness, developmental disability, alcoholism or drug
dependence that are maintained by DHFS, by county departments of community
programs or developmental disabilities services or by treatment facilities are
confidential. Patient health care records that are prepared by or under the
supervision of a health care provider also are confidential. With certain exceptions,
the treatment records or patient health care records may be released only with the
informed written consent of the individual. One of the exceptions applies to staff
members of the protection and advocacy agency or to staff members of a private
nonprofit corporation with which the protection and advocacy agency has contracted.
(A protection and advocacy agency is an entity designated by the governor to
implement a system to protect and advocate the rights of persons with
developmental disabilities or mental illness, as authorized by federal law.)
Currently, however, if the individual for whom treatment records are sought has had
a guardian appointed for him or her on grounds of incompetence or is a minor with
developmental disability who has a parent or a guardian but not a guardian who was
appointed for him or her on grounds of incompetence, information about that
individual that the protection and advocacy agency, or the nonprofit corporation with
which it has contracted, may obtain is limited to the nature of an alleged rights
violation, if any; the name, birth date and county of residence of the individual;
information as to whether the individual was voluntarily admitted, involuntarily
committed or protectively placed and the date and place of the admission,
commitment or placement; and the name, address and telephone number of the
guardian and the date and place of the guardian's appointment or, for a minor with
developmental disability who has not had a guardian appointed on grounds of
incompetence, the name, address and telephone number of the minor's parent or
guardian. If the protection and advocacy agency or the nonprofit corporation with
which it has contracted wishes to obtain additional information, it must notify the
guardian or the parent in writing and may obtain the information only if the
guardian or parent does not object in writing within 15 days after the notice is
mailed. However, access to records of an individual may be provided to the agency
or corporation if:
1. The record custodian fails to promptly provide the name and address of the
parent or guardian.
2. A complaint is received by the agency or corporation about an individual, the
agency or corporation determines that there is probable cause to believe that the
health or safety of the individual is in serious and immediate jeopardy and the
agency or corporation has made a good-faith effort to contact the parent or guardian
and has either been unable to contact the parent or guardian or has offered
assistance to resolve the situation and the parent or guardian has failed or refused
to act on behalf of the individual.
3. A complaint is received by the agency or corporation about an individual or
there is otherwise probable cause to believe that the individual has been subject to
abuse or neglect by a parent or guardian.
4. The individual is a minor whose custody has been transferred to a legal
custodian or for whom a guardian, who is an agency of the state or a county, has been
appointed.
Current federal law authorizes access to records of an individual with mental
illness or developmental disability who has a legal guardian or other legal
representative and for whom the agency or corporation has received a complaint or
for whom there is probable cause to believe that the health and safety of the
individual is in serious or immediate jeopardy, whenever the agency or corporation
has contacted the individual's representative and offered assistance and the
representative has failed or refused to act on behalf of the individual. Current
federal law also authorizes access for an individual who, by reason of his or her
mental or physical condition, is unable to authorize access for the agency or
corporation, who does not have a legal guardian or other legal representative or for
whom the legal guardian is the state and with respect to whom the agency or
corporation has received a complaint or there is probable cause to believe that the
individual has been subject to abuse or neglect.
This bill changes the conditions under which the agency, or the corporation with
which it contracts, is authorized to provide access to the treatment or patient health
care records of an individual, to conform the conditions to current federal law.
However, the bill retains overriding a denial of access if the record custodian fails to
promptly provide the parent's or guardian's name or address or if the individual is
a minor whose custody is transferred to a legal custodian or for whom the state or
county is appointed as guardian.
Under current law, elderly, physically disabled, developmentally disabled,
chronically mentally ill or chemically dependent persons receive services under the
long-term support community options program. Reimbursement for long-term
community support services may not exceed the average monthly cost of nursing
home care, as determined by DHFS. This limitation does not apply to a person under
the age of 22 or a person who is ventilator-dependent, or if DHFS determines that
the cost of providing that person with nursing home care would exceed the cost of
providing the person with care in the community. This bill eliminates the limitation
on payment under the long-term support community options program for long-term
community support services.
Under current law, DHFS must implement a plan that is approved by DOA to
ensure that, before July 1, 1999, there are sufficient revenues to cover expenditures
in reimbursement of care provided to patients of the Mendota and Winnebago mental
health institutes. DHFS must report to DOA every 3 months, ending on July 1, 1999,
on the implementation of this plan. This bill appropriates general purpose revenues
equivalent to the value of the equipment and buildings of the Mendota and
Winnebago mental health institutes to be used to cover expenditures in
reimbursement of care provided to the mental health institutes. The bill also
eliminates the requirement that DHFS annually increase rates charged for services
provided by the mental health institutes and eliminates the plan deadline of July 1,
1999.
Currently, a county department of community programs must prepare a local
plan to meet the needs of persons within the county department's jurisdiction who
have mental illness, developmental disability, alcoholism or drug addiction,
including homeless persons. The proposed budget for the county for mental health
services for the succeeding year must be based on this plan. The county department
of community programs must submit this plan every 3 years to DHFS for review.
DHFS, in turn, must develop a model community mental health plan for county use,
assist counties in developing their individual plans and, in conjunction with the
council on mental health, review the plans submitted by counties. This bill
eliminates all these requirements.
Other health and human services
Under current law, DHFS must give prior approval to the construction or total
replacement of a nursing home; an increase in the bed capacity of a nursing home;
a capital expenditure that exceeds $1,000,000 by or on behalf of a nursing home; an
expenditure that exceeds $600,000 for clinical equipment by or on behalf of a nursing
home; and the partial or total conversion of a nursing home to a facility primarily
serving the developmentally disabled. This bill eliminates the requirement for prior
approval by DHFS of the total replacement of a nursing home, capital expenditures
that exceed $1,000,000 for renovation or replacement of a nursing home and
expenditures that exceed $600,000 for renovation or replacement of clinical
equipment of a nursing home.
This bill requires that DHFS distribute a total of $250,000 in fiscal year
1997-98 and a total of $150,000 in fiscal year 1998-99 to develop and extend use of
a facility licensing and certification system. However, the bill permits the secretary
of administration to withhold approval for expenditure of these funds until he or she
determines that DHFS has adequately explored and planned for the use of a common
licensing and certification system with the department of regulation and licensing.
Under current law, providers of care or services who contract with DHFS or
with a county department of social services, human services, developmental
disabilities services or community programs must, as a condition of reimbursement,
provide the purchaser with a certified financial and compliance audit report for
purchased care and services that exceed $25,000. The audit report is required
biennially unless federal law requires an annual report. This bill revises audit
requirements for care and service providers who contract with DHFS or county
departments to require annual submission of audits if care and services purchased
exceed $50,000. The bill authorizes DHFS to require audits of a provider from whom
purchases were less than $50,000, under certain circumstances.
Under current law, the Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority
(WHEFA) may issues bonds to finance certain projects for the construction,
remodeling, furnishing or equipping of a health facility. The definition of "health
facility" does not include a rural medical center that is required to be licensed by
DHFS. A rural medical center is a facility that provides 2 or more health care
services, is organized under a single governing and corporate structure, and is
located in a county or municipality that has a population of less than 15,000 and in
an area that is not an urbanized area.
This bill changes the definition of "health facility" by including rural medical
centers and excluding fitness centers and weight reduction centers. The bill also
provides that WHEFA may retain bond counsel services only on the basis of a
competitive process that is approved by the secretary of administration.
This bill eliminates the current expiration date of July 1, 1997, for the
requirement that DHFS establish a pilot project for a contract with the Red Cliff
Band of Lake Superior Chippewas and requires that DHFS administer the pilot
project.
Under current law, as part of the home-based enterprise program, DILJD must
distribute funds for homecraft services relating to the marketing and distribution of
homecraft products and to the purchase of capital equipment for each client who
participates in the homecraft program. This bill eliminates the requirement that
DILJD distribute funds for homecraft services relating to the purchase of capital
equipment.
Currently, DHFS, in cooperation with DPI, must prepare a joint alcohol and
other drug abuse prevention, intervention, treatment and rehabilitation plan and
biennially submit a report to the legislature on implementation of the plan. This bill
eliminates this requirement.
Insurance
The health insurance risk-sharing plan (HIRSP) under current law provides
major medical health insurance coverage for persons who are covered under
medicare because they are disabled, persons who have tested positive for the human
immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and persons who have been refused coverage, or
coverage at an affordable price, in the private health insurance market because of
their mental or physical health conditions. Responsibility for administering HIRSP
is split between the office of the commissioner of insurance (OCI) and a board of
governors, which includes the commissioner of insurance or a designated
representative from OCI. Claims, other than those in excess of premiums, are paid
by premiums collected from persons with coverage under HIRSP. Administrative
expenses of HIRSP, including claims in excess of premiums, are paid out of the health
insurance risk-sharing fund, which is derived from assessments paid by health
insurers. The commissioner determines each health insurer's annual assessment
and the schedule of premiums. Covered persons with annual household incomes
below $20,000 pay reduced premiums and deductibles through a subsidy program
administered by the board and funded with general purpose revenue and certain
assessments and penalties paid by health insurers.
This bill transfers responsibility for administering HIRSP to the department
of health and family services (DHFS) and the board and makes a number of changes
to the program. Under the bill, the commissioner continues to determine each
insurer's share of the assessments that provide funding for HIRSP and to impose
assessments for certain insurer actions that make a person eligible for coverage
under HIRSP. The secretary of health and family services, or his or her
representative, as well as the commissioner, or his or her representative, are
members of the board, and the secretary, or his or her representative, serves as
chairperson of the board. Payment of claims, as well as other administrative duties,
is performed by the same fiscal agent that pays claims under the medical assistance
(MA) program. While under current law covered expenses under HIRSP are the
usual and customary charges, reduced by 10%, for specified services, after the
transfer occurs the covered expenses are the amounts that are paid for those services
under MA. Under the bill, services and articles covered under HIRSP must be
provided by persons who are certified to provide services or articles under MA.
Reduced premiums and deductibles for covered persons with incomes below $20,000
continue to be subsidized, but DHFS may recover from the estate of a deceased
person who had coverage under HIRSP the amount of any subsidies that are paid on
behalf of the person after the transfer to DHFS occurs.
Local government
Under the current tax incremental financing (TIF) program, a city or village
may create a tax incremental district (TID) in part of its territory to foster
development if at least 50% of the area to be included in the TID is blighted, in need
of rehabilitation or suitable for industrial sites. Before a city or village may create
a TID, several steps are required. These steps include public hearings, preparation
and adoption of a proposed project plan for the TID, approval of the proposed project
plan by the city or village and the creation of a joint review board to review the
proposal. The joint review board, which is made up of representatives of the
overlying taxing jurisdictions of the proposed TID, must approve the project plan or
the TID may not be created.
This bill creates a mechanism, very similar to the TIF program, for financing
the "eligible costs" incurred by a city, village, town or county (political subdivision)
for environmental remediation (ER) of property that is owned by the political
subdivision. If the remediated property is transferred to another person and is then
subject to property taxation, ER tax incremental financing may be used to allocate
some of the property taxes that are levied on the property to the political subdivision
to pay for the costs of remediation.
"Eligible costs" are capital costs, financing costs and administrative and
professional service costs for the removal, containment or monitoring of, or the
restoration of soil or groundwater affected by, environmental pollution. Eligible
costs are reduced by any amounts received from persons responsible for the
discharge of a hazardous substance on the property to pay remediation costs and by
the amount of net gain on the sale of the property by the political subdivision.
If development on the remediated parcel increases the value of the property
above the base value, an "ER value increment" is created. That portion of taxes
collected on the ER value increment in excess of the base value is called an "ER tax
increment". The ER tax increment is placed in a special fund that may be used by
the political subdivision only to pay back the eligible costs of the ER, instead of being
distributed to the overlying taxing jurisdictions that have the authority to levy
property taxes on the remediated parcel of property. The ER tax increment must be
paid into the special fund until all of the political subdivision's eligible costs are paid
or until 17 years after the ERTID of the property has been certified by the
department of revenue (DOR), whichever comes first.
In calculating shared revenue payments, "full valuation" includes these
increments for municipalities and counties that create the district but not for the
other units of government in the district, and "local general purpose taxes" includes
the portion of these increments collected for a municipality or county that is
attributable to the municipality's or county's own levy. Shared revenue payments
decrease as full valuation increases, and those payments increase as local general
purpose taxes increase.
The bill also provides that the equalized valuation of a school district is reduced
by the amount of an ER value increment on a parcel of property that is certified by
DOR under the bill. In certain cases the result of such a reduction is additional state
aid to the school district.
Under current law, the state or any city, village, town, county, school district,
metropolitan sewerage district, regional planning commission and several other
units of local government may enter into a cooperative agreement or contract with
other such entities and with federally recognized Indian tribes or bands in this state
for the receipt or furnishing of services or the joint exercise of any power or duty
required or authorized by law. Such contracts may provide for creation of a
commission and letting of contracts. A commission that is created under current law
may finance the acquisition, development, remodeling, construction and equipment
of land, buildings and facilities for a regional project by issuing revenue bonds or by
borrowing or issuing municipal bonds.
This bill authorizes a local governmental unit in the Wisconsin Dells area to
enter into a cooperative agreement or contract with another such unit under these
current law provisions to establish a commission to jointly create a premier resort
center. Such a center is one or more related structures owned, operated or leased by
a governmental unit and used primarily for, or to support, cultural events or
commercial activities, but not primarily for recreational or sporting activities. The
governmental units that participate in the establishment of a commission may
finance a premier resort center by issuing, either jointly or separately, revenue
bonds. The governmental units that constitute the commission may also impose,
separately, a sales tax on food and beverages and may issue "Class B" liquor licenses,
which authorize the retail sale of alcohol beverages, in excess of the quotas that
otherwise apply to the governmental units.
Under the bill, the interest income generated by revenue bonds issued by a
governmental unit or units to finance a premier resort center is exempt from income
taxation (see also Taxation).
Current law establishes a local professional baseball park district (a "baseball
district") for each county with a population exceeding 500,000 (currently, only
Milwaukee County). All counties contiguous to the county with a population
exceeding 500,000 are included in the baseball district's jurisdiction. Among other
powers, a baseball district has the power to acquire, construct, equip, maintain,
improve, operate and manage baseball park facilities as revenue-generating
enterprises. Current law authorizes the department of administration (DOA) to
provide certain services to a baseball district, for compensation to be agreed upon
between DOA and the district, including engineering, architectural, project
management and other building construction services. Similarly, current law
authorizes the building commission to serve as financial consultant to assist and
coordinate the issuance of the bonds of a baseball district. A baseball district is
authorized to levy a sales tax of 0.1% within the baseball district's jurisdiction to fund
its activities. This tax is collected by DOR, which retains a percentage of the sales
taxes collected for the district (3% for the first 2 years and 1.5% thereafter) to cover
the costs of administering the tax.
This bill validates all actions taken by DOA or the building commission before
the day on which this bill becomes law to provide services that directly benefit a
baseball district, including services provided before the creation of the baseball
district. A baseball district that directly benefits from these services is liable for the
fair market value of those services, as determined by the secretary of administration,
regardless of whether the baseball district was in existence at the time that the
services were provided or whether the baseball district authorized the provision of
those services. If the secretary of administration determines that a baseball district
is liable for services and that the liability remains unpaid, the bill requires the
secretary of administration to certify to DOR the amount of the unpaid liability. The
bill requires the amount certified to be transferred from the sales tax moneys
collected by DOR for the baseball district to a specified DOA appropriation account
and the capital improvement fund in payment of the liability. These transfers may
be made in a lump sum or in instalments, as specified in the certification.
Under current law, a person who becomes a member of a paid city fire
department must become a member of that city's fire fighters relief association,
which gives relief to the sick and disabled members of the association and their
families. Such a person is required to pay an initiation fee of not more than $50 and
annual dues. This bill deletes the $50 cap on the initiation fee.
Also under current law, a retired fire fighter who continues to be a member of,
and pay dues to, his or her association is not allowed to be an officer in the association.
This bill allows such a person to become an officer of the association.
Natural resources
Fish, game and wildlife
This bill authorizes the department of natural resources (DNR) to determine
who may issue each type of fish and game license, permit and stamp. DNR may issue
them directly and may appoint one or more county clerks or other persons as issuing
agents. Under current law, DNR must issue all types of fish and game licenses,
permits and stamps. Also under current law, with certain limited exceptions, if a
county clerk issues a type of fish and game license or stamp, all county clerks must
do so.
The bill also prohibits county clerks from appointing agents to issue fish and
game licenses and stamps. Under current law, county clerks may make these
appointments.
The bill allows DNR to charge a fee for releasing the names, addresses and
telephone numbers of persons to whom fish and game licenses, permits and stamps
have been issued. Under current law, DNR must release this information for free.
Under this bill, if DNR and the Lac du Flambeau band of the Lake Superior
Chippewa have in effect an agreement under which the band agrees to limit its
treaty-based, off-reservation rights to fish, the band may elect to issue fishing
licenses and stamps that are equivalent to fishing licenses or stamps issued by DNR.
These licenses and stamps include resident and nonresident annual and 2-day
licenses and inland waters trout stamps. If the band chooses to issue any of these
licenses or the trout stamps, it must collect the same fee as DNR charges. Although
the licenses or stamps may be used wherever a DNR license or stamp is valid, they
may be issued only on the Lac du Flambeau reservation.
If the agreement described above is in effect, the bill authorizes the band to
issue DNR fishing licenses and the DNR trout stamp and to retain the fees that the
band collects for these licenses and stamps and authorizes DNR to pay the band an
amount equal to the amount that DNR collects from its agents who issue DNR fishing
licenses and trout stamps on the reservation.
The band must use the fees that it collects for its own and for DNR fishing
licenses and stamps and any payment from DNR for these licenses and trout stamps
for fishery management on the reservation.
Under current law, DNR must sell any wild animals or carcasses that are seized
in violation of the fish and game laws and that are not destroyed by DNR. This bill
allows DNR to distribute for free seized carcasses to programs that provide food to
low-income persons or to the elderly. The bill also specifically allows DNR to sell
seized animals and carcasses to certain businesses licensed by DNR, such as bait
dealers, wholesale fish dealers and taxidermists. Under the bill, these businesses
may resell the seized animals or carcasses. Resale is prohibited under current law
except by eating establishments to their customers.
Under current law, DNR may limit the total number of certain types of fish and
game that are harvested by establishing a system for issuing a limited number of
permits. Under this bill, DNR may establish a permitting system for harvesting
sturgeon, either by hook and line or by spearing or by both.
With certain exceptions, under current law any person born after January 1,
1973, must successfully complete a hunter education and safety course administered
by DNR in order to be issued a license that authorizes hunting, either by firearm or
by bow and arrow or by both. This bill requires DNR to include 2 components in the
course: one in firearm safety and one in bow hunting safety. Under the bill, a person
may take only the bow hunting safety component. However, if a person successfully
completes only the bow hunting safety component, the person may only be issued a
license authorizing hunting by bow and arrow.
