LRB-1627/1
MJL:kaf:jlb
1997 - 1998 LEGISLATURE
April 17, 1997 - Introduced by Representatives Olsen, Jeskewitz, Albers, Duff,
Grothman, Hahn, Huebsch, Jensen, M. Lehman, Ott
and Owens, cosponsored
by Senators Darling, Huelsman, Schultz and Welch. Referred to Committee
on Education.
AB304,2,2 1An Act to renumber 121.07 (6) (e) and 121.07 (7) (e); to renumber and amend
2117.30 (1), 120.06 (2), 121.90 (2), 121.905 (3) (a) and 121.905 (3) (b); to amend
367.12 (12) (e) 2., 117.05 (1m), 117.05 (2) (a), 117.05 (4) (a) (intro.), 117.05 (5) (a),
4117.05 (8), 117.05 (9) (title), 117.05 (9) (a) (intro.), 117.05 (9) (b), 117.05 (10),
5117.14 (1) (b), 117.15 (2m), 117.15 (6), 117.17 (1) (a), 117.20 (1), 117.22 (2) (a) 1.,
6117.22 (2) (d), 120.42 (1) (a), 121.84 (1) (b) and 121.905 (4); and to create 67.05
7(6a) (bg), 67.05 (7) (j), 67.12 (12) (e) 2r., 67.12 (12) (h), 117.05 (4) (d), 117.05 (9)
8(a) 1. and 2., 117.105, 117.17 (1) (bm), 117.22 (2) (bm), 117.22 (3), 117.25 (4),
9117.30 (1) (b) and (c), 120.06 (2) (b), 120.42 (1) (c), 121.07 (6) (e) 2., 121.07 (7)
10(e) 2., 121.78 (2) (bm), 121.78 (2) (br), 121.90 (2) (b), 121.905 (3) (a) 2., 121.905
11(3) (b) 2., 121.91 (2m) (e), 121.91 (4) (c) 3. and 121.91 (4) (f) of the statutes;
12relating to: procedures to create a school district out of the territory of one or
13more existing school districts and information provided to persons filing a

1petition for a referendum on the detachment of large territory from one school
2district and its attachment to another school district.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill creates the following procedures under which a new school district may
be created out of a portion or portions of the territory of one or more existing school
districts and the following provisions applicable after the creation of the new school
district.
A. REORGANIZATION PROCEDURES
1. Initiation of reorganization
The reorganization may be initiated by either of the following:
(a) The adoption of resolutions to create the new school district by the school
boards of all the affected school districts (school districts containing territory within
the proposed district); or
(b) The filing of a petition to create the new school district signed by electors who
include at least 20% of the total number of electors residing in all the affected school
districts and 5% of the electors residing in each affected school district. The petition
must include the approximate boundaries of the proposed school district.
2. Public hearing, precise boundaries and allocation of assets and
liabilities
Each school board must hold a public hearing on the proposed reorganization.
Two or more school boards of the affected school districts may hold a joint public
hearing.
After the public hearing, the school boards of the affected school districts may
agree on the precise boundaries and the allocation of assets and liabilities between
the affected school districts and the new school district if the school boards of a
majority of the affected school districts adopt resolutions by November 1 following
the initiation of reorganization. If a majority of the school boards fails to agree on
the precise boundaries and fails to allocate the assets and liabilities by that date, the
school district boundary appeal board (SDBAB) must draw the precise boundaries
and allocate the assets and liabilities. In addition, the department of public
instruction (DPI) must charge the affected school boards a fee sufficient to reimburse
DPI for the costs of SDBAB. In determining the precise boundaries, neither the
school board nor SDBAB may detach territory from any additional school districts.
The assets and liabilities of the affected school districts must be allocated
among the affected school districts and the new school district in proportion to the
equalized valuations of all taxable property in the affected school districts and the
new school district. The boards of the affected school districts may establish an
alternative method to apportion assets and liabilities.

3. Decision of the school boards
After the precise boundaries have been drawn and the assets and liabilities
have been allocated, the school board of each affected school district must adopt a
resolution granting or denying the reorganization. The resolution must state the
school board's rationale and include an evaluation of the following factors:
(a) The geographical and topographical characteristics of the affected school
districts, including the estimated travel time to and from school for pupils in the
school districts.
(b) The educational needs of all the children residing in the affected school
districts, the educational programs currently offered by each affected school district
and the ability and commitment of each school district to meet those needs and
continue to offer those educational programs.
(c) Whether the creation of the new school district will have any adverse effect
on the programs currently offered by the affected school districts.
(d) The testimony of and written statements filed by the residents of the
affected school districts.
(e) The estimated fiscal effect of the proposed reorganization on the affected
school districts, including the effect of the apportionment of assets and liabilities.
(f) Whether the proposed creation of a new school district will make any part
of an affected school district's territory noncontiguous.
(g) The socioeconomic level and racial composition of the pupils who reside or
will reside in territory proposed to be included in the new school district; the
proportion of the pupils who reside in such territory who are children at risk; and the
effect that the pupils will have on the present and future socioeconomic level and
racial composition of the affected school districts and on the proportion of the affected
school district's enrollments that will be children at risk.
(h) Other appropriate factors.
The failure of a school board to adopt a resolution either ordering or denying the
creation of the school district before the required date constitutes a denial of the
creation of the school district by that school board. If any of the affected school boards
denies the reorganization and no electors file a petition for review by SDBAB of the
school boards' decision, the process ends and the reorganization does not occur. If all
the affected school boards grant the reorganization and the electors do not file a
petition for review, a referendum is held.
4. Review by SDBAB
If all the affected school boards grant the reorganization, a petition for review
by SDBAB may be filed if it is signed by 10% or more of the electors residing in the
territory of the affected school districts that is not located within the proposed new
school district. If any of the affected school districts denies the reorganization, a
petition for review by SDBAB may be filed if it is signed by 10% or more of the electors
residing in each affected school district.
If a petition for review is filed, SDBAB must hold a public hearing. After the
hearing and after consulting with the affected school boards, SDBAB may modify the
proposed boundaries and the allocation of assets and liabilities, unless SDBAB drew
the boundaries and made the allocation. If SDBAB modifies the proposed boundaries

or allocation of assets and liabilities, the school boards of the affected school districts
have another opportunity to vote on the proposed reorganization before SDBAB
issues its decision.
SDBAB must issue a written decision granting or denying the reorganization,
which states its rationale and evaluation of each of the factors listed in section A.3.
If SDBAB does not grant the reorganization, there is no reorganization. If SDBAB
grants the reorganization, a referendum of electors is held.
DPI may charge the person filing the petition for review a fee sufficient to
reimburse DPI for the costs of SDBAB.
5. Referendum for final approval; election of school board; effective date of
reorganization; appeal to court
If the affected school boards or SDBAB grants the reorganization, the proposed
reorganization must also be approved at a referendum by electors residing in the
territory of the proposed new school district. If the referendum fails to approve the
reorganization, no reorganization occurs. If the referendum approves the
reorganization, the reorganization takes effect either on the next July 1 or on the 2nd
July 1, if the members of the new school board, who are elected at the spring election,
choose to delay the effective date of the reorganization for one year. Members of the
school board of the new school district who are elected at the first election must reside
in the territory of the school district that will be created. If a person elected to the
school board of the new school district is also a member of a school district from which
territory was detached to create the new school district, he or she is not eligible to
serve on the school board of the new school district unless he or she resigns as a
member of the school board of the other school district.
Any person aggrieved by SDBAB's granting or denial of the proposed
reorganization may appeal to circuit court.
B. PROVISIONS APPLICABLE AFTER THE REORGANIZATION
1. Revenue limits and state aid
School districts from which territory was detached to create the new school
district receive state equalization aid based on their previous year's per member
equalized valuations, enrollments and costs, as current law provides. In addition:
(a) In the school year in which the reorganization takes effect, the existing
school districts' revenue limits are increased by an amount equal to 10% of their state
aid; and
(b) In each of the following 4 school years, the school districts' primary and
secondary cost ceilings per member and their primary, secondary and tertiary
guaranteed valuations per member are multiplied by 1.1. The additional state aid
generated by these 10% adjustments is not subject to revenue limits.
The 3-year rolling membership average used to reflect changes of membership
under the current revenue limits applies to a school district's loss of membership due
to the loss of territory to the new school district created by the reorganization.
The revenue limit for the new school district for its first year of operation is
calculated by multiplying the previous year's per pupil revenue for each existing
school district by the number of pupils enrolled in that school district during the
previous school year who resided in territory that was detached from that school

district to create the new school district. The per pupil revenues of each existing
school district are then added and the sum is divided by the total number of pupils
residing in the detached territory who were enrolled in the previous school year in
the school district from which the territory was detached. The allowable revenue
increase for the current school year is added and the resulting sum is multiplied by
the greater of:
(a) The total number of pupils residing in the detached territory who were
enrolled in the previous school year in the school district from which the territory was
detached; or
(b) The number of pupils enrolled in the new school district as determined by
its 3rd Friday of September pupil count for the current school year.
After the first year of operation of the new school district, its revenue limit is
computed as the revenue limit for other school districts is computed, with
appropriate adjustments to reflect that pupil counts cannot be averaged over 3 years
until a school district has been in operation for that long.
2. Referenda for borrowing to finance the allocation of assets and liabilities
Under current law, if a school district proposes to borrow through the issuance
of promissory notes in excess of $5,000 or through the issuance of bonds in any
amount, a referendum may be required if the amount to be borrowed causes the
school district's outstanding indebtedness incurred without a referendum (excluding
debt incurred before August 9, 1989) to exceed the lesser of $1,000,000 or 1.5% of the
statewide average equalized valuation per member multiplied by the school district's
membership.
This bill creates an exception to these referenda provisions that allows both the
new school district and the school districts from which territory was detached,
without holding a referendum, to issue bonds or promissory notes to finance any
assets or liabilities apportioned to them under the reorganization or to finance any
assets, including cash, apportioned to another school district. In addition, the
revenue limits of the school districts issuing the notes or bonds is increased by the
amount of the funds needed to pay the general obligation debt service on the
borrowed amounts.
Loading...
Loading...