Under current law, before a person may commence an action for damages
related to a libelous publication in a newspaper or periodical, the person must give
the person alleged to have committed the libel the chance to correct the libelous
material. The person libeled must specify the article and the alleged statements that
are false and defamatory and a statement of what are the true facts. If the person
alleged to have committed the libel publishes a correction in the first issue of the
newspaper or periodical published within one week after the receipt of the notice
from the person libeled, the person libeled may only recover his or her actual
damages.
This bill creates a parallel procedure for dealing with libelous material
published in radio, television and electronic media, such as an electronic bulletin
board on the internet, a computer network or an electronic online service. Under the
bill, a person libeled in radio, television or an electronic medium may not commence
a civil action for damages until he or she gives the person alleged to be responsible
for the libelous material the opportunity to correct the libelous material. The
correction must be broadcast at approximately the same time of day or times of day
as the alleged defamatory broadcasts, and within 4 days after receiving a request for
the correction. If electronic media are used, the correction must be placed in the same
locations in the electronic media as the libelous material was placed within one week
after receipt of the request for the correction from the libeled person. If the correction
meets the requirements under the bill, the person libeled is only eligible for his or
her actual damages.
The bill also provides that the person that administers or provides facilities for
an electronic medium involved in an alleged libel may not be held liable for the
alleged libel unless that person knew that the material was false and defamatory and
still allowed it to be added to the electronic medium or did not remove the material
from the electronic medium after becoming aware that the material was false and
defamatory.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do
enact as follows:
AB328, s. 1
1Section
1. 895.05 (3) of the statutes is created to read:
AB328,2,42
895.05
(3) (a) In this subsection, "electronic medium" means a computerized
3or electronic information service, including a bulletin board, a network, an online
4service, electronic mail, a forum or a news group.
AB328,2,105
(b) Before any civil action is commenced for damages related to the inclusion
6of any libelous material in any electronic medium, the libeled person shall first give
7the person alleged to be responsible for the libelous material a reasonable
8opportunity to correct the libelous material. The libeled person shall request that
9the person alleged to be responsible for the libelous material correct the material.
10A request may be made only by doing all of the following:
AB328,2,1311
1. Mailing or delivering a written request to the person alleged to be responsible
12for the libelous material or placing the request at one of the locations in the electronic
13medium known to the libeled person where the libelous material was placed.
AB328,2,1714
2. Specifying in the request the locations in the electronic media known to the
15libeled person where the libelous material was placed, the material in the electronic
16medium that is claimed to be false and defamatory and a statement of what are
17claimed to be the true facts.
AB328,3,2
13. Stating the sources, if any, from which the true facts may be ascertained with
2definiteness and certainty.
AB328,3,93
(c) To correct the libelous material, the person alleged to be responsible for the
4libelous material shall, within one week after receiving the request under par. (b),
5place a correction under par. (d) in the same location in the electronic medium as the
6libelous material was placed. The person alleged to be responsible for the libelous
7material shall maintain the correction at that location for a period similar to the time
8that the libelous material was at that location, to the extent that the person can
9control the location and period of that placement.
AB328,3,1610
(d) If the true facts are, with reasonable diligence, ascertainable with
11definiteness and certainty, only a retraction shall constitute a correction. If the true
12facts are not, with reasonable diligence, ascertainable with definiteness and
13certainty, the placement of the libeled person's statement of the true facts identified
14as the libeled person's statement at the same electronic medium location as the
15libelous material was placed shall constitute a correction within the meaning of this
16paragraph.
AB328,3,2117
(e) A correction under par. (d), timely added to the proper location in the
18electronic medium, without comment, in a position and type as prominent as the
19alleged libel, shall constitute a defense against the recovery of any damages except
20actual damages, as well as being competent and material in the mitigation of actual
21damages to the extent that the correction mitigates the actual damages.
AB328,3,2422
(f) The person who administers or provides facilities for the electronic medium
23involved in the alleged libel may not be held liable for the alleged libel unless the
24person did one of the following:
AB328,4,2
11. Knowingly and wilfully allowed material that the person knew was false and
2defamatory to be placed in the electronic medium.
AB328,4,43
2. Allowed material to remain in the electronic medium after the person
4became aware that the material was false and defamatory.
AB328, s. 2
5Section
2. 895.052 of the statutes is renumbered 895.052 (2) and amended to
6read:
AB328,4,147
895.052
(2) The Notwithstanding sub. (1), the owner, licensee or operator of a
8visual or sound radio broadcasting station or network of stations, and the agents or
9employes of any such owner, licensee or operator, shall not be liable in damages for
10any defamatory statement published or uttered in, or as a part of, a visual or sound
11broadcast by a candidate for political office in those instances in which, under the
12acts of congress or the rules and regulations of the federal communications
13commission, the broadcasting station or network is prohibited from censoring the
14script of the broadcast.
AB328, s. 3
15Section
3. 895.052 (1) of the statutes is created to read:
AB328,4,2116
895.052
(1) (a) Before any civil action is commenced for damages related to
17defamation in any radio or television broadcast or cable television transmission, the
18defamed person shall first give the person alleged to be responsible for the
19defamatory statement or material broadcast or transmitted a reasonable
20opportunity to correct the defamatory statement or material. A request to correct the
21defamatory statement or material may be made only by doing all of the following:
AB328,4,2322
1. Mailing or delivering a written request to the person alleged to be responsible
23for the defamatory broadcast or transmission.
AB328,5,3
12. Specifying in the request the program and the statement or material that
2is claimed to be false and defamatory and a statement of what are claimed to be the
3true facts.
AB328,5,54
3. Stating the sources, if any, from which the true facts may be ascertained with
5definiteness and certainty.
AB328,5,136
(b) To correct the defamatory statement or material, the person alleged to be
7responsible for the defamatory statement or material shall, within 4 days after
8receiving the request under par. (a), broadcast or transmit a correction, as described
9under par. (c). The person alleged to be responsible for the defamatory statement or
10material shall broadcast or transmit at least 2 corrections for each alleged
11defamatory broadcast or transmission, one of which shall be at approximately the
12same time or times of day and of approximately the same length as the alleged
13defamatory broadcast or transmission.
AB328,5,2114
(c) If the true facts are, with reasonable diligence, ascertainable with
15definiteness and certainty, only a retraction shall constitute a correction. If the true
16facts are not, with reasonable diligence, ascertainable with definiteness and
17certainty, the broadcast or transmission of the defamed person's statement of the
18true facts, or as much of the statement as is not defamatory to another, scurrilous,
19or otherwise improper for broadcast or transmission, identified as the defamed
20person's statement, shall constitute a correction within the meaning of this
21paragraph.
AB328,5,2522
(d) A correction timely broadcast or transmitted as required under par. (b),
23without comment, shall constitute a defense against the recovery of any damages
24except actual damages, as well as being competent and material in the mitigation of
25actual damages to the extent that the correction mitigates the actual damages.
AB328,6,32
(1) This act first applies to material placed in electronic media or broadcast or
3transmitted on radio or television on the effective date of this subsection.