Wisconsin Legislature: LRB-0310

SECTION 1. 20.285 (1) (mc) of the statutes is created to read:

20.285 (1) (mc) Veterinary diagnostic laboratory; federal funds. All moneys received from the federal government for the veterinary diagnostic laboratory to be used in accordance with the provisions of the federal grant or program.

****NOTE: This SECTION involves a change in an appropriation that must be reflected in the revised schedule in s. 20.005, stats.

(End)

LRB-0279LRB-0279/2
PJK:cjs&wlj:jf
2003 - 2004 LEGISLATURE

DOA:......Fath - BB0179, Federal incentive payments exceeding statutory cap

For 2003-05 Budget -- Not Ready For Introduction

2003 BILL

AN ACT ...; relating to: federal child support incentive payments and making an appropriation.

Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau

Health and human services

Other health and human services

Under current state law, DWD must distribute child support incentive payments (incentive payments) to counties according to a formula worked out between DWD and representatives of counties. The incentive payments come from two sources: 1) federal incentive payments made to the state on the basis of successful child support enforcement efforts of DWD and county child support agencies and 2) certain child support collections assigned to the state by public assistance recipients. The statutes provide that a county's share of the incentive payments may not exceed the costs of the county's child support program (generally, the program in each county under which child support is established and enforced), that all incentive payments received by a county may be used only for the costs of its child support program, and that the total incentive payments that are paid to all counties in a year may not exceed $12,340,000.

This bill provides that, if the incentive payments received in a year from the federal government exceed $12,340,000, the excess amount will be divided equally between the counties and DWD. Each county's share of one-half of the excess will be determined according to the formula that already determines the county's share of incentive payments. A county still may not receive incentive payments, however, that exceed its child support program costs and must use the excess incentive payments for the costs of its child support program.

DWD may use its share of any excess incentive payments for activities under its child support enforcement program and for the costs of receiving and disbursing support and support-related payments.

For further information see the state and local fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.

The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:

SECTION 1. 20.445 (3) (nL) of the statutes is amended to read:

20.445 (3) (nL) Federal program Child support local assistance; federal funds. All moneys received from the federal government or any of its agencies for continuing programs, except for 50% of the amount of the federal moneys received as child support incentive payments that exceeds the maximum specified in s. 49.24 (2) (b), to be expended as local assistance for the purposes specified, except that the following amounts shall lapse from this appropriation to the general fund: in each calendar year, 55% of the federal moneys made available to support prosecution of welfare fraud in this state, as determined by the secretary of administration.

****NOTE: This SECTION involves a change in an appropriation that must be reflected in the revised schedule in s. 20.005, stats.

****NOTE: This is reconciled s. 20.445 (3) (nL). This SECTION has been affected by LRB-0279 and LRB-1243.

SECTION 2. 49.22 (7m) of the statutes is amended to read:

49.22 (7m) The department may contract with or employ a collection agency or other person to enforce a support obligation of a parent who is delinquent in making support payments and may contract with or employ an attorney to appear in an action in state or federal court to enforce such an obligation. To pay for the department's administrative costs of implementing this subsection, the department may charge a fee to counties, retain up to 50% of any incentive payment made to this state under 42 USC 658 for a collection under this subsection, and retain use federal matching funds or funds retained by the department under s. 49.24 (2) (c), or use up to 30% of this state's share of a collection made under this subsection on behalf of a recipient of aid to families with dependent children or a recipient of kinship care payments under s. 48.57 (3m) or long-term kinship care payments under s. 48.57 (3n).

SECTION 3. 49.24 (2) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:

49.24 (2) (b) The Except as provided in par. (c), the total of payments made to counties under sub. (1) and in federal child support incentive payments may not exceed $12,340,000 per year.

SECTION 4. 49.24 (2) (c) of the statutes is created to read:

49.24 (2) (c) If federal child support incentive payments that are received for a year exceed the maximum specified in par. (b), 50% of the amount that exceeds the maximum specified in par. (b) shall be distributed to counties according to the formula under par. (a), subject to the incentive payments limit specified in par. (a), and the remainder shall be retained by the department to pay the costs of the department's activities under ss. 49.22 and 49.227 and costs related to receiving and disbursing support and support-related payments.

SECTION 5. 49.24 (3) of the statutes is amended to read:

49.24 (3) A county that receives any state child support incentive payment under sub. (1) or any federal child support incentive payment under sub. (2) (a) or (c) may use the funds only to pay costs under its child support program under s. 49.22.

SECTION 9359. Initial applicability; workforce development.

(1) EXCESS CHILD SUPPORT INCENTIVE PAYMENTS. The treatment of sections 20.445 (3) (n) (with respect to federal moneys received as child support payments) and (nL) (with respect to federal moneys received as child support payments), 49.22 (7m) (by SECTION 2), and 49.24 (2) (b) and (c) and (3) of the statutes first applies to child support incentive payments awarded for 2002.

(End)

LRB-0310LRB-0310/2
RCT:kmg:pg
2003 - 2004 LEGISLATURE

DOA:......Walker - BB0198, Agrichemical management fund and agricultural chemical cleanup fund changes

For 2003-05 Budget -- Not Ready For Introduction

2003 BILL

AN ACT ...; relating to: fees and surcharges related to pesticides, fertilizer, and feed, reimbursement under the Agricultural Chemical Cleanup Program, the required balance in the agricultural chemical cleanup fund, and making an appropriation.

Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau

Agriculture

This bill makes several changes related to the agrichemical management fund and the agricultural chemical cleanup fund and moneys that are deposited in those funds.

Current law generally requires a person who manufactures or distributes fertilizer in this state to obtain an annual license from DATCP. A person who is required to be licensed must pay several fees and surcharges to DATCP, including a basic fee of 30 cents per ton of fertilizer sold or distributed or $25, whichever is greater. The basic fee is deposited in the agrichemical management fund. This bill increases the basic fee to 45 cents per ton for fertilizer sold or distributed after June 30, 2003, but does not change the $25 minimum fee.

Current law generally requires a person who manufactures or distributes animal feed to obtain an annual license from DATCP. A person who is required to be licensed must pay a feed inspection fee of 23 cents per ton and the fee is deposited in the agrichemical management fund. This bill increases the annual feed inspection fee for feed sold after December 31, 2003, to 30 cents per ton.

Current law generally requires a person who manufactures or labels pesticides for sale in this state to obtain an annual license from DATCP. The license year begins on January 1. A person who is required to be licensed must pay a number of fees and surcharges when the person applies for a license. The fees and surcharges are based on sales during the 12 months ending on September 30 of the year preceding the year for which a license is sought.

Under this bill, the fees and surcharges paid by an applicant for a pesticide manufacturer or labeler license are based on sales during the 12-month period that ends on September 30 of the license year. When the person applies for a license, the person pays the fees and surcharges based on estimated sales during that 12-month period. At the end of the license year, the person pays any balance due based on actual sales or may request a refund from DATCP for any overpayment. If the person estimated that sales would be less than 90% of sales during the preceding year and the person's payment due at the end of the year is more than 20% of the payment made based on estimated sales, the person is also required to pay a penalty for underestimating.

Under current law, DATCP makes grants to counties for farm chemical and container collection programs. The grants are funded from the agrichemical management fund. This bill changes the source of funding for the farm chemical and container grants to the recycling fund.

Current law authorizes DATCP to reduce surcharges that are deposited into the agricultural chemical cleanup fund below the amounts specified in the statutes. The law also requires DATCP to adjust the surcharge amounts as necessary to maintain a balance in the fund at the end of each fiscal year of at least $2,000,000 but not more than $5,000,000. This bill eliminates the minimum required fiscal-year-end balance for the agricultural chemical cleanup fund.

Currently, a person who is licensed to manufacture or distribute fertilizer must pay an agricultural chemical cleanup surcharge of 38 cents per ton of fertilizer sold or distributed, unless DATCP establishes a lower surcharge by rule. DATCP rules specify a surcharge of 38 cents per ton. This bill provides that the agricultural chemical cleanup surcharge is 88 cents per ton, unless the rules specify a lower surcharge.

Under the Agricultural Chemical Cleanup Program, DATCP pays a portion of the costs of cleaning up spills of agricultural chemicals. Currently, the payment equals 80% of eligible costs that exceed a deductible and are less than a specified maximum. This bill reduces the reimbursement rate under the Agricultural Chemical Cleanup Program from 80% to 75% of eligible costs.

For further information see the state fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.

The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:

SECTION 1. 20.115 (7) (v) of the statutes is repealed.

****NOTE: This SECTION involves a change in an appropriation that must be reflected in the revised schedule in s. 20.005, stats.

SECTION 2. 20.115 (7) (va) of the statutes is created to read:

20.115 (7) (va) Chemical and container disposal. From the recycling fund, the amounts in the schedule for chemical and container collection grants under s. 93.55.

****NOTE: This SECTION involves a change in an appropriation that must be reflected in the revised schedule in s. 20.005, stats.

SECTION 3. 25.465 (8) of the statutes is amended to read:

25.465 (8) The fees collected under s. 94.72 (5) (b) and (6) (a) 1. and 2. and 2m. and (i).

SECTION 4. 93.55 (2) of the statutes is amended to read:

93.55 (2) COLLECTION GRANTS. The department may award a grant to a county for a chemical and container collection program. A grant under this subsection shall fund all or a part of the cost of a program. Costs eligible for funding include the cost of establishing a collection site for chemicals and chemical containers, the cost of transporting chemical containers to a dealer or distributor for refill and reuse or to a hazardous waste facility, as defined in s. 291.01 (8), and costs associated with the proper use and handling and disposal or recycling of chemicals and chemical containers. Grants shall be paid from the appropriation under s. 20.115 (7) (v) (va).

SECTION 5. 94.64 (4) (a) 1. of the statutes is amended to read:

94.64 (4) (a) 1. A basic fee of 23 30 cents per ton for fertilizer sold or distributed beginning on October 29, 1999, and ending on June 30, 2001 before July 1, 2003, and 30 45 cents per ton for fertilizer sold or distributed after June 30, 2001 2003, with a minimum fee of $25.

SECTION 6. 94.64 (4) (a) 5. of the statutes is amended to read:

94.64 (4) (a) 5. An agricultural chemical cleanup surcharge of 38 88 cents per ton on all fertilizer that the person sells or distributes in this state after June 30, 1999, unless the department establishes a lower surcharge under s. 94.73 (15).

SECTION 7. 94.681 (1) (cm) of the statutes is created to read:

94.681 (1) (cm) "Payment period" means the 12 months ending on September 30 of the calendar year for which a license is sought under s. 94.68.

SECTION 8. 94.681 (2) of the statutes is repealed and recreated to read:

94.681 (2) ANNUAL LICENSE FEE. An applicant for a license under s. 94.68 shall pay an annual license fee for each pesticide product that the applicant sells or distributes for use in this state. The amount of the fee is based on sales of pesticide products during the payment period. An applicant shall pay an estimated fee before the start of each license year as provided in sub. (3s) (a) and shall make a fee adjustment payment before the end of the license year if required under sub. (3s) (b). Except as provided in sub. (5) or (6), the fee for each pesticide product is as follows:

(a) For each household pesticide product:

1. If the applicant sells less than $25,000 of the product during the payment period for use in this state, $265.

2. If the applicant sells at least $25,000 but less than $75,000 of the product during the payment period for use in this state, $750.

3. If the applicant sells at least $75,000 of the product during the payment period for use in this state, $1,500.

(b) For each industrial pesticide product:

1. If the applicant sells less than $25,000 of the product during the payment period for use in this state, $315.

2. If the applicant sells at least $25,000 but less than $75,000 of the product during the payment period for use in this state, $860.

3. If the applicant sells at least $75,000 of that product during the payment period for use in this state, $3,060.

1. If the applicant sells less than $25,000 of that product during the payment period for use in this state, $320.

2. If the applicant sells at least $25,000 but less than $75,000 of the product during the payment period for use in this state, $890.

3. If the applicant sells at least $75,000 of the product during the payment period for use in this state, $3,060 plus 0.2% of the gross revenues from sales of the product during the payment period for use in this state.

SECTION 9. 94.681 (3) of the statutes is amended to read:

94.681 (3) NONHOUSEHOLD PESTICIDES; CLEANUP SURCHARGE. Except for the license years that begin on January 1, 1999, and January 1, 2000, an An applicant for a license under s. 94.68 shall pay an agricultural chemical cleanup surcharge for each nonhousehold pesticide product that the applicant sells or distributes for use in this state. The amount of the surcharge is based on sales of nonhousehold pesticide products during the payment period. An applicant shall pay an estimated surcharge before the start of each license year as provided in sub. (3s) (a) and shall make a surcharge adjustment payment before the end of the license year if required by sub. (3s) (b). Except as provided in sub. (6) or under s. 94.73 (15), the amount of the surcharge is as follows:

(a) If the applicant sold sells less than $25,000 of the product during the preceding year payment period for use in this state, $5.

(b) If the applicant sold sells at least $25,000 but less than $75,000 of that product during the preceding year payment period for use in this state, $170.

(c) If the applicant sold sells at least $75,000 of that product during the preceding year payment period for use in this state, an amount equal to 1.1% of gross revenues from sales of the product during the preceding year payment period for use in this state.

SECTION 10. 94.681 (3m) of the statutes is amended to read:

94.681 (3m) WOOD PRESERVATIVES; CLEANUP SURCHARGE. An applicant for a license under s. 94.68 shall pay an environmental cleanup surcharge for each pesticide product that is not a household pesticide and is solely labeled for use on wood and contains pentachlorophenol or coal tar creosote that the applicant sells or distributes in this state. The amount of the surcharge is based on sales of pesticide products that are not household pesticides and are solely labeled for use on wood and contain pentachlorophenol or coal tar creosote during the payment period. An applicant shall pay an estimated surcharge before the start of each license year as provided in sub. (3s) (a) and shall make a surcharge adjustment payment before the end of the license year if required by sub. (3s) (b). Except as provided in sub. (6), the amount of the surcharge is as follows:

(a) If the applicant sold sells less than $25,000 of the product during the preceding year payment period for use in this state, $5.

(b) If the applicant sold sells at least $25,000 but less than $75,000 of that product during the preceding year payment period for use in this state, $170.

SECTION 11. 94.681 (3s) of the statutes is created to read:

94.681 (3s) PAYMENT OF FEES AND SURCHARGES. (a) Before the start of a license year, an applicant shall estimate the gross revenues that the applicant will receive from sales of each pesticide product during the payment period that ends during the year for which a license is sought under s. 94.68 and shall pay the amounts under subs. (2), (3), and (3m) based on that estimate. At least 15 days before beginning to sell a new pesticide product in this state, a licensee shall estimate the gross revenues that the applicant will receive from sales of that pesticide product during the payment period in which the licensee begins to sell the pesticide product and shall pay the amounts under subs. (2), (3), and (3m) based on that estimate.

(b) Before the end of a license year, a licensee shall report to the department the gross revenues that the licensee received from sales of each pesticide product during the payment period that ended during the license year, as required under s. 94.68 (2) (a) 2., and shall reconcile the estimated payment made under par. (a) with the amounts actually due under subs. (2), (3), and (3m) as follows:

1. If the amount due based on actual sales is greater than the amount paid based on estimated sales, the licensee shall pay the additional amount due.

2. If the amount due based on actual sales is less than the amount paid based on estimated sales, the licensee may request the department to reimburse the licensee for the amount of the overpayment.