Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Schultz, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Senate
Bill 652
Read a third time and passed.
Senator Schultz, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate Bill 446 be placed at the foot of the eleventh order of business on the calendar of March 7, 2006.
Senator Schultz, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate Bill 552 be placed at the foot of the eleventh order of business on the calendar of March 7, 2006.
Senator Schultz, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate Bill 553 be placed at the foot of the eleventh order of business on the calendar of March 7, 2006.
Senator Schultz, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate Bill 564 be placed at the foot of the eleventh order of business on the calendar of March 7, 2006.
Senator Schultz, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate Bill 607 be placed at the foot of the eleventh order of business on the calendar of March 7, 2006.
Senator Schultz, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate Bill 612 be placed at the foot of the eleventh order of business on the calendar of March 7, 2006.
Senator Schultz, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate Bill 638 be placed at the foot of the eleventh order of business on the calendar of March 7, 2006.
Senate Bill 446
Relating to: interfund transfers in state government.
Read a second time.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Schultz, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Senate
Bill 446
Read a third time.
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 21; noes, 12; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Brown, Carpenter, Cowles, Darling, Ellis, S. Fitzgerald, Grothman, Harsdorf, Kanavas, Kapanke, Kedzie, A. Lasee, Lassa, Lazich, Leibham, Olsen, Reynolds, Roessler, Schultz, Stepp and Zien - 21.
Noes - Senators Breske, Coggs, Decker, Erpenbach, Hansen, Jauch, Miller, Plale, Risser, Robson, Taylor and Wirch - 12.
Absent or not voting - None.
Passed.
Senate Bill 552
Relating to: a Medical Assistance family planning demonstration project minimum age eligibility limitation change.
Read a second time.
Senator Schultz, with unanimous consent, asked that all action be immediately messaged to the Assembly.
Messaged.
Senator Grothman, with unanimous consent, asked that the journal reflect that he would like to change his vote from noe to aye on Senate Bill 515.
Senator Taylor, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate Bill 552 be placed after Senate Bill 607 on the calendar of March 7, 2006.
Senator Zien in the chair.
Senate Bill 553
Relating to: political fund raising by certain executive state officials.
Read a second time.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate Bill 553?
Adopted.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 2 to Senate Bill 553?
Adopted.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Schultz, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Senate
Bill 553
Read a third time.
The ayes and noes were required and the vote was: ayes, 32; noes, 1; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Breske, Brown, Carpenter, Coggs, Cowles, Darling, Decker, Ellis, Erpenbach, S. Fitzgerald, Grothman, Hansen, Harsdorf, Jauch, Kanavas, Kapanke, Kedzie, A. Lasee, Lassa, Lazich, Leibham, Miller, Olsen, Plale, Reynolds, Risser, Robson, Roessler, Schultz, Stepp, Wirch and Zien - 32.
Noes - Senator Taylor - 1.
Absent or not voting - None.
Passed.
Senate Bill 564
Relating to: the number of ballots authorized to be printed at an election.
Read a second time.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate Bill 564?
The ayes and noes were demdnded and the vote was: ayes, 23; noes, 10; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Brown, Cowles, Darling, Decker, Ellis, S. Fitzgerald, Grothman, Harsdorf, Kanavas, Kapanke, Kedzie, A. Lasee, Lassa, Lazich, Leibham, Miller, Olsen, Reynolds, Risser, Roessler, Schultz, Stepp and Zien - 23.
Noes - Senators Breske, Carpenter, Coggs, Erpenbach, Hansen, Jauch, Plale, Robson, Taylor and Wirch - 10.
Absent or not voting - None.
Adopted.
Senate amendment 2 to Senate Bill 564 offered by Senator Carpenter.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 2 to Senate Bill 564?
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Kedzie, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Senate
Bill 564
Read a third time.
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 17; noes, 14; absent or not voting, 2; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Cowles, Ellis, S. Fitzgerald, Grothman, Harsdorf, Kanavas, Kapanke, Kedzie, A. Lasee, Lazich, Leibham, Olsen, Reynolds, Roessler, Schultz, Stepp and Zien - 17.
Noes - Senators Breske, Carpenter, Coggs, Decker, Erpenbach, Hansen, Jauch, Lassa, Miller, Plale, Risser, Robson, Taylor and Wirch - 14.
Absent or not voting - Senators Brown and Darling - 2.
Passed.
Senate Bill 607
Relating to: exempting certain cities and villages from the comprehensive planning statute known as Smart Growth.
Read a second time.
Senator Schultz, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Senate
Bill 607
Read a third time.
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 18; noes, 15; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Brown, Cowles, Darling, Ellis, S. Fitzgerald, Grothman, Harsdorf, Kanavas, Kapanke, A. Lasee, Lazich, Leibham, Olsen, Reynolds, Roessler, Schultz, Stepp and Zien - 18.
Noes - Senators Breske, Carpenter, Coggs, Decker, Erpenbach, Hansen, Jauch, Kedzie, Lassa, Miller, Plale, Risser, Robson, Taylor and Wirch - 15.
Absent or not voting - None.
Passed.
Senate Bill 552
Relating to: a Medical Assistance family planning demonstration project minimum age eligibility limitation change.
Senator Grothman, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate Bill 552 be placed after Senate Bill 612 on the calendar of March 7, 2006.
Senate Bill 612
Relating to: administration of elections; providing exemptions from and extending the time limit for emergency rule procedures; granting rule-making authority; and providing penalties.
Read a second time.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate Bill 612?
Adopted.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 612?
Adopted.
