Senate Bill 103
Relating to: the income and franchise tax credit for research and research facilities.
The question was: Shall the Senate recede from its position on Assembly amendment 1 to Senate Bill
103.
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 18; noes, 14; absent or not voting, 1; as follows:
S808
Ayes - Senators Brown, Darling, Grothman, Hansen, Harsdorf, Kanavas, Kapanke, Kedzie, A. Lasee, Lassa, Lazich, Leibham, Olsen, Robson, Roessler, Schultz, Stepp and Zien - 18.
Noes - Senators Breske, Carpenter, Coggs, Cowles, Decker, Ellis, Erpenbach, Jauch, Miller, Plale, Reynolds, Risser, Taylor and Wirch - 14.
Absent or not voting - Senator S. Fitzgerald - 1.
The Senate recedes from its position.
Senate amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 1 to Senate Bill 103 offered by Senator Kanavas.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 1 to Senate Bill 103?
Adopted.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 1 to Senate Bill 103 be concurred in as amended?
Concurred in as amended.
Senator Kedzie, with unanimous consent, asked that all action be immediately messaged to the Assembly.
Messaged.
Senate Bill 612
Relating to: administration of elections; providing exemptions from and extending the time limit for emergency rule procedures; granting rule-making authority; and providing penalties.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 3 to Senate Bill 612 be concurred in?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 18; noes, 14; absent or not voting, 1; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Brown, Cowles, Darling, Ellis, Grothman, Harsdorf, Kanavas, Kapanke, Kedzie, A. Lasee, Lazich, Leibham, Olsen, Reynolds, Roessler, Schultz, Stepp and Zien - 18.
Noes - Senators Breske, Carpenter, Coggs, Decker, Erpenbach, Hansen, Jauch, Lassa, Miller, Plale, Risser, Robson, Taylor and Wirch - 14.
Absent or not voting - Senator S. Fitzgerald - 1.
Concurred in.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 4 to Senate Bill 612 be concurred in?
Concurred in.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 5 to Senate Bill 612 be concurred in?
Concurred in.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 6 to Senate Bill 612 be concurred in?
Concurred in.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 7 to Senate Bill 612 be concurred in?
Concurred in.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 8 to Senate Bill 612 be concurred in?
Concurred in.
Senate Bill 653
Relating to: contracts with entities to operate resource centers and care management organizations under the Family Care Program.
Senate amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 2 to Senate Bill 653 offered by Senator Carpenter.
Senator Zien in the chair.
Senator Roessler moved rejection of Senate amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 2 to Senate Bill 653.
The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 2 to Senate Bill 653?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 18; noes, 14; absent or not voting, 1; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Brown, Cowles, Darling, Ellis, Grothman, Harsdorf, Kanavas, Kapanke, Kedzie, A. Lasee, Lazich, Leibham, Olsen, Reynolds, Roessler, Schultz, Stepp and Zien - 18.
Noes - Senators Breske, Carpenter, Coggs, Decker, Erpenbach, Hansen, Jauch, Lassa, Miller, Plale, Risser, Robson, Taylor and Wirch - 14.
Absent or not voting - Senator S. Fitzgerald - 1.
Rejected.
Senate amendment 2 to Assembly substitute amendment 2 to Senate Bill 653 offered by Senator Carpenter.
Senator Lasee in the chair.
Senator Roessler moved rejection of Senate amendment 2 to Assembly substitute amendment 2 to Senate Bill 653.
The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 2 to Assembly substitute amendment 2 to Senate Bill 653?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 18; noes, 14; absent or not voting, 1; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Brown, Cowles, Darling, Ellis, Grothman, Harsdorf, Kanavas, Kapanke, Kedzie, A. Lasee, Lazich, Leibham, Olsen, Reynolds, Roessler, Schultz, Stepp and Zien - 18.
Noes - Senators Breske, Carpenter, Coggs, Decker, Erpenbach, Hansen, Jauch, Lassa, Miller, Plale, Risser, Robson, Taylor and Wirch - 14.
Absent or not voting - Senator S. Fitzgerald - 1.
Rejected.
The question was: Shall Assembly substitute amendment 2 to Senate Bill 653 be concurred in?
Concurred in.
Assembly Bill 850
Relating to: the regulation of certain wharves, piers, boat shelters, boat hoists, and boat lifts.
Senator Wirch moved nonconcurrence in Assembly amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 850.
S809
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to
Assembly Bill
850 be nonconcurred in?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 15; noes, 16; absent or not voting, 2; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Breske, Carpenter, Coggs, Cowles, Decker, Erpenbach, Hansen, Jauch, Lassa, Miller, Plale, Risser, Robson, Taylor and Wirch - 15.
Noes - Senators Brown, Darling, Ellis, Grothman, Harsdorf, Kanavas, Kedzie, A. Lasee, Lazich, Leibham, Olsen, Reynolds, Roessler, Schultz, Stepp and Zien - 16.
Absent or not voting - Senators S. Fitzgerald and Kapanke - 2.
Nonconcurrence refused.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Assembly Bill
850 be concurred in?
The ayes and noes were required and the vote was: ayes, 16; noes, 16; absent or not voting, 1; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Brown, Darling, Grothman, Harsdorf, Kanavas, Kapanke, Kedzie, A. Lasee, Lazich, Leibham, Olsen, Reynolds, Roessler, Schultz, Stepp and Zien - 16.
Noes - Senators Breske, Carpenter, Coggs, Cowles, Decker, Ellis, Erpenbach, Hansen, Jauch, Lassa, Miller, Plale, Risser, Robson, Taylor and Wirch - 16.
Absent or not voting - Senator S. Fitzgerald - 1.
Concurrence refused.
Senator Schultz, with unanimous consent, asked that the Senate stand informal.
12:36 P.M.
__________________
12:44 P.M.
Senator Schultz moved that the Senate reconsider the vote by which concurrence in Assembly amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 was refused.
The question was: Shall the vote by which concurrence in Assembly amendment1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 was refused be reconsidered?
The ayes and noes were required and the vote was: ayes, 16; noes, 15; absent or not voting, 2; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Brown, Darling, Ellis, Grothman, Harsdorf, Kanavas, Kedzie, A. Lasee, Lazich, Leibham, Olsen, Reynolds, Roessler, Schultz, Stepp and Zien - 16.
Noes - Senators Breske, Carpenter, Coggs, Cowles, Decker, Erpenbach, Hansen, Jauch, Lassa, Miller, Plale, Risser, Robson, Taylor and Wirch - 15.
Absent or not voting - Senators S. Fitzgerald and Kapanke - 2.
Reconsidered.
Senator Risser moved that the Senate adjourn.
The question was: Shall the Senate adjourn?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 15; noes, 16; absent or not voting, 2; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Breske, Carpenter, Coggs, Cowles, Decker, Erpenbach, Hansen, Jauch, Lassa, Miller, Plale, Risser, Robson, Taylor, and Wirch
- 15.
Noes - Senators Brown, Darling, Ellis, Grothman, Harsdorf, Kanavas, Kedzie, A. Lasee, Lazich, Leibham, Olsen, Reynolds, Roessler, Schultz, Stepp, and Zien
- 16.
Absent or not voting - Senators S. Fitzgerald and Kapanke - 2.
Adjournment refused.
