AB254,14,83
(d) An agreement under this subsection may provide that, during the term of
4the agreement, no other procedure for altering a municipality's boundaries may be
5used to alter a boundary that is affected by the agreement, except an annexation
6conducted under s. 281.43 (1m), regardless of whether the boundary is proposed to
7be maintained or changed or is allowed to be changed under the agreement. After
8the agreement has expired, the boundary may be altered.
AB254,14,159
(e) A boundary change included in an agreement under this subsection shall
10be accomplished by the enactment of an ordinance by the governing body designated
11to do so in the agreement. The filing and recording requirements under s. 66.0217
12(9) (a), as they apply to cities and villages under s. 66.0217 (9) (a), apply to
13municipalities under this subsection. The requirements for the secretary of state
14under s. 66.0217 (9) (b), as they apply under that section, apply to the secretary of
15state when he or she receives an ordinance that is filed under this subsection.
AB254,14,1716
(f) No action to contest the validity of an agreement under this subsection may
17be commenced after 60 days from the date the agreement becomes effective.
AB254,14,2018
(g) This subsection is the exclusive authority under this section for entering
19into an agreement that determines all or a portion of the common boundary line
20between municipalities.
AB254,14,2421
(h) An agreement under this section that has been entered into before the
22effective date of this subsection .... [revisor inserts date], that affects the location of
23a boundary between municipalities, is not invalid as lacking authority under this
24section to affect the location of the boundary.
Note: Creates another tool for any two municipalities with a common boundary
to determine by agreement all or a portion of the common boundary line between them.
It is envisioned that this authority will be used, for example, by municipalities who wish
to make minor changes in their common boundaries or by municipalities who wish to
enter into an initial, shorter term agreement before developing a cooperative plan under
s. 66.0307.
Currently, there is no express authority under s. 66.0301 to enter into boundary
agreements and, although the section has been used for such agreements, has been
questioned by some (see the note concerning par. (h), below).
Paragraph (a) of subsection (6) provides the authority to enter into written
boundary agreements and the permitted content of those agreements. The authority
regarding boundary lines is patterned after the language found in s. 66.0307. The
agreements may also include provisions the party municipalities may agree to under s.
66.0301 generally and under s. 66.0305 (agreements to share revenues).
Paragraph (b) establishes the maximum term of an agreement at ten years
(although a boundary line established under an agreement remains until subsequently
changed). When it is desirable to have an agreement of longer duration, s. 66.0307 is
available (and, presumably, another agreement under this subsection could be entered
into).
Paragraph (c) sets forth the procedure for approving an agreement under this
subsection. The procedure includes a public hearing on the proposed agreement
(including individual notice to specified affected property owners); approval by the
governing body of each municipality by adoption of a resolution; and an optional
referendum of the electors residing within the territory whose jurisdiction is subject to
change as a result of the agreement.
Paragraph (d) authorizes an agreement under this subsection to provide that
during the term of the agreement no other procedure for altering a municipality's
boundaries may be used to alter a boundary affected by the agreement (with the exception
of an annexation conducted under s. 281.43 (1m), stats., relating to a department of
natural resources order for sewer service extension).
Paragraph (e) provides filing and recording requirements for boundary changes
pursuant to an agreement under the subsection. It is patterned after s. 66.0307 (10).
Paragraph (f) provides a statute of limitations for contesting the validity of an
agreement under the subsection. It is patterned after s. 66.0307 (11).
Paragraph (g) limits the authority under s. 66.0301 for entering into an agreement
that determines all or a portion of the common boundary line between municipalities to
that extended under the subsection.
Paragraph (h) is intended to eliminate uncertainty regarding the authority under
current s. 66.0301 to determine municipal boundaries. For example, at least one circuit
court has held that boundary agreements are not authorized under s. 66.0301. This
provision is intended to provide that agreements previously entered into under s. 66.0301
that affected the location of a boundary between municipalities are not invalid insofar as
lacking authority under s. 66.0301 to affect the location of the boundary.
AB254, s. 20
1Section
20. 66.0305 (4) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB254,15,52
66.0305
(4) (b) An agreement entered into under sub. (2) may address any other
3appropriate matters, including any agreements with respect to services or
4agreements with respect to municipal boundaries under s. 66.0225
, 66.0301 (6), or
566.0307.
AB254, s. 21
1Section
21. 66.0307 (1) (a) of the statutes is renumbered 66.0307 (1) (am).
AB254, s. 22
2Section
22. 66.0307 (1) (af) of the statutes is created to read:
AB254,16,53
66.0307
(1) (af) "Comprehensive plan" means an adopted plan that contains
4the elements under s. 66.1001 (2) or, if a municipality has not adopted a plan that
5contains those elements, a master plan adopted under s. 62.23 (2) or (3).
Note: Provides a definition for the s. 66.0307 boundary agreement-by-cooperative
plan procedure.
AB254, s. 23
6Section
23. 66.0307 (2) (intro.) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB254,16,157
66.0307
(2) Boundary change authority. (intro.) Any combination of
8municipalities may determine the boundary lines between themselves under a
9cooperative plan that is approved by the department under this section.
A single city
10or village and a single town may use the mediated agreement procedure under sub.
11(4m) to determine a common boundary line under a cooperative plan that is approved
12by the department under this section. No boundary of a municipality may be
13changed or maintained under this section unless the municipality is a party to the
14cooperative agreement. The cooperative plan shall provide one or more of the
15following:
Note: Revised to reflect the creation by Sec. 29 of this bill of a new mediated
agreement procedure for developing a cooperative plan.
AB254, s. 24
16Section
24. 66.0307 (3) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB254,17,217
66.0307
(3) (b)
Purpose of plan. The cooperative plan shall be made with the
18general purpose of guiding and accomplishing a coordinated, adjusted and
19harmonious development of the territory covered by the plan
which will, in
20accordance with existing and future needs, best promote public health, safety,
21morals, order, convenience, prosperity or the general welfare, as well as efficiency
1and economy in the process of development consistent with the comprehensive plan
2of each participating municipality.
Note: Links the purpose language for a cooperative plan under s. 66.0307 to each
participating municipality's comprehensive plan.
AB254, s. 25
3Section
25
. 66.0307 (3) (c) of the statutes is repealed and recreated to read:
AB254,17,64
66.0307
(3) (c)
Content of plan; consistency with comprehensive plan. The
5cooperative plan shall describe how it is consistent with each participating
6municipality's comprehensive plan.
Note: Repeals the detailed provisions of current s. 66.0307 (3) (c) specifying the
content of a cooperative plan for the physical development of the territory covered by the
plan. Substitutes a general requirement that the cooperative plan describe how it is
consistent with each participating municipality's comprehensive plan. The repealed
language provides as follows:
66.0307 (3) (c) Content of plan; physical development of territory. The cooperative
plan, and any accompanying maps, plats, charts and descriptive and explanatory
materials, shall show the plan agreed upon for the physical development of the territory
covered by the plan. The plan may include, without limitation because of enumeration,
any of the following:
1. The general location, character and extent of streets, highways, freeways, street
grades, roadways, walks, bridges, viaducts, parking areas, tunnels, public places and
areas, parks, parkways and playgrounds.
2. Sites for public buildings and structures, airports, pierhead and bulkhead lines
and waterways.
3. Routes for railroads and buses.
4. The general location and extent of sewers, water conduits and other public
utilities, whether privately or publicly owned.
5. The acceptance, widening, narrowing, extension, relocation, removal, vacation,
abandonment or change of use of any of the public ways, grounds, places, spaces,
buildings, properties, utilities, routes or terminals described in subds. 1. to 4.
6. Historic districts.
7. The general location, character and extent of community centers and
neighborhood units.
8. The general character, extent and layout of the replanning of blighted districts
and slum areas.
9. A comprehensive zoning plan.
AB254, s. 26
7Section
26. 66.0307 (3) (d) 4. of the statutes is amended to read:
AB254,17,108
66.0307
(3) (d) 4. Include a statement explaining how any part of the plan
9related to the location of boundaries meets the approval criteria under sub. (5) (c)
104. and 5.
Note: Strikes a cross-reference to a statutory provision repealed by Sec. 32 of this
bill.
AB254, s. 27
1Section
27
. 66.0307 (3) (dm) of the statutes is repealed.
Note: Repeals the current provision describing the required content of a
cooperative plan in connection with environmental consequences and housing needs.
Much of this will be addressed in a municipality's comprehensive plan. The repealed
language provides as follows:
66.0307 (3) (dm) Content of plan; environmental consequences and housing needs.
The cooperative plan shall:
1. Identify any significant adverse consequences to the natural environment,
including air and water pollution, energy use, development outside compact urban areas
and contribution to urban sprawl, that may be caused by the proposed physical
development of the territory covered by the plan.
2. Demonstrate that each participating municipality has considered alternatives
to the proposed physical development of the territory covered by the plan, in order to
minimize or avoid significant adverse environmental consequences, including those
under subd. 1., and include in the plan a description of the alternatives considered.
3. If the physical development of the territory covered by the plan is subject to
federal environmental laws or regulations, state laws or state environmental rules,
describe how compliance with the laws, regulations or rules will be achieved.
4. Address the need for safe and affordable housing to meet the needs of diverse
social and income groups in each municipality that is participating in the preparation of
the plan.
5. Include a statement of why the cooperative plan meets the approval criterion
under sub. (5) (c) 5m.
AB254, s. 28
2Section
28. 66.0307 (4) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB254,18,83
66.0307
(4) (b)
Public hearing. At least
120 60 days after adoption under par.
4(a) of the last resolution by a participating municipality and at least 60 days before
5submitting a cooperative plan to the department for review and approval under sub.
6(5), the participating municipalities shall hold a joint hearing on the proposed plan.
7Notice of the hearing shall be given by each participating municipality by class 3
8notice under ch. 985.
Note: Reduces from 120 to 60 the minimum number of days that must pass, after
the last adoption by a participating municipality of its resolution authorizing
participation in the cooperative plan preparation, before the municipalities may hold the
required public hearing on the proposed plan.
AB254, s. 29
9Section
29
. 66.0307 (4m) of the statutes is created to read:
AB254,19,210
66.0307
(4m) Mediated agreement procedure. (a) 1. As an alternative to the
11parties mutually invoking the procedure under this section, a city, village, or town
1may petition the department for mediation of a cooperative plan under this
2paragraph.
AB254,19,33
2. A city or village may petition for mediation if all of the following apply:
AB254,19,74
a. The city or village adopts an authorizing resolution under sub. (4) (a) (intro.)
5and requests in writing an adjacent town to adopt an authorizing resolution under
6sub. (4) (a) (intro.) and the town fails to adopt the resolution within 60 days after the
7request is received by the town.
AB254,19,88
b. The city or village has adopted a comprehensive plan.
AB254,19,99
3. A town may petition for mediation if all of the following apply:
AB254,19,1310
a. The town adopts an authorizing resolution under sub. (4) (a) (intro.) and
11requests in writing an adjacent city or village to adopt an authorizing resolution
12under sub. (4) (a) (intro.) and the city or village fails to adopt the resolution within
1360 days after the request is received by the city or village.
AB254,19,1414
b. The town has adopted a comprehensive plan.
AB254,20,515
(b) A municipality that is authorized under par. (a) to petition the department
16for mediation and elects to do so shall submit the petition within 90 days after the
17municipality has adopted the authorizing resolution described in par. (a) 2. a. or 3.
18a. Upon receipt of a petition for mediation, the department shall notify the
19nonpetitioning adjacent municipality identified in the petition that the petition has
20been submitted. Within 45 days after receipt of notice from the department that a
21petition has been submitted, the nonpetitioning municipality shall notify the
22department whether it agrees to engage in mediation to develop a cooperative plan
23under this section. Failure of the nonpetitioning municipality to timely notify the
24department is considered notice that the municipality does not agree to engage in
25mediation. The department shall send written notice of the nonpetitioning
1municipality's decision, on whether it will participate, to the petitioning
2municipality. If the nonpetitioning municipality refuses to engage in mediation, the
3petitioning municipality may not submit a petition under this paragraph involving
4the same nonpetitioning municipality for a period of 3 years after the department
5sends notice of the refusal.
AB254,20,86
(c) 1. If a nonpetitioning town refuses under par. (b) to engage in mediation, the
7town may not contest any annexation of its territory to the petitioning city or village
8that is commenced during the shorter of the following periods:
AB254,20,109
a. The period of 270 days beginning after the town refuses under par. (b) to
10engage in mediation.
AB254,20,1211
b. The period beginning on the date the town refuses under par. (b) to engage
12in mediation and ending on the date the town agrees to engage in mediation.
AB254,20,1913
2. If a nonpetitioning city or village refuses under par. (b) to engage in
14mediation, an annexation of territory of the petitioning town to the nonpetitioning
15city or village that is commenced during the shorter of the following periods shall be
16reviewed by the department in the manner described under s. 66.0217 (6), regardless
17of the population of the county in which the annexation proceeding is commenced,
18and, notwithstanding s. 66.0217 (11) (c), may be contested by the town if the
19department determines that the annexation is not in the public interest:
AB254,20,2120
a. The period of 270 days beginning after the city or village refuses under par.
21(b) to engage in mediation.
AB254,20,2322
b. The period on the date the city or village refuses under par. (b) to engage in
23mediation and ending on the date the city or village agrees to engage in mediation.
AB254,21,524
(d) 1. If both the petitioning municipality and nonpetitioning municipality
25agree to engage in mediation to develop a cooperative plan under this section, the
1municipalities shall select a mediator. The department may assist the
2municipalities in selecting a mediator. If the municipalities are unable to agree on
3the selection of a mediator, the department shall furnish a list of 5 mediators to the
4municipalities. The municipalities shall alternatively strike a name from the list
5until one name remains, who shall be the mediator.
AB254,21,106
2. The mediator shall assist the parties through recognized mediation
7techniques to develop and reach agreement on a cooperative plan under this section.
8Unless the participating municipalities agree to extend the mediation period, the
9mediation period expires after 270 days. Unless they agree otherwise, the
10participating municipalities are equally responsible for the costs of the mediation.
AB254,21,1711
(e) Before the participating municipalities engage in mediation under this
12subsection, each shall adopt a resolution under sub. (4) (a) (intro.) and provide the
13required notice of the resolution. Notwithstanding sub. (4) (b), if the participating
14municipalities agree on a cooperative plan under this subsection, a public hearing
15on the plan shall be held under sub. (4) (b) no sooner than 45 days after agreement
16is reached and at least 45 days before submitting the plan to the department for
17review and approval under sub. (5).
AB254,21,2318
(f) If any litigation contesting annexation of territory of the petitioning or
19nonpetitioning town to the city or village is commenced during the 3-year period
20after the department receives the petition for mediation under par. (b), the judge
21shall under s. 802.12 (2), unless the nonpetitioning municipality objects, order the
22parties to select a settlement alternative under s. 802.12 (1) (i) as a means to attempt
23settlement.
Note: Creates a mediated agreement procedure under the boundary
agreement-by-cooperative plan statute that provides a means for one municipality to
bring an adjacent municipality "to the table" in connection with a common boundary and
related issues.
Paragraph (a) states the conditions under which a municipality may petition DOA
for mediation of a cooperative plan: the petitioning municipality 1) must have adopted
a comprehensive plan and a resolution authorizing participation in the preparation of a
cooperative plan and 2) must have requested the adjacent municipality to adopt an
authorizing resolution for a cooperative plan, which request was not honored within 60
days after the request.
Paragraph (b) establishes time periods for petitioning DOA for the mediated
agreement procedure and for the nonpetitioning municipality to respond to the invitation
to mediate. It also provides that if the nonpetitioning municipality refuses to engage in
mediation, the petitioning municipality may not submit another petition for mediation
involving the same municipality for a period of three years after notice of refusal.
Paragraph (c) provides the incentive to agree to engage in mediation.
If a town refuses to engage in mediation, the town may not contest any annexation
of its territory to the petitioning city or village that is commenced during the shorter of
the following periods: 1) the period of 270 days beginning after the town refuses to engage
in mediation; or 2) the period beginning after the town refuses to engage in mediation
until the town agrees to engage in mediation (the latter assumes that the town may agree
to engage in mediation after first refusing).
If a city or village refuses to engage in mediation, an annexation of territory of the
petitioning town to the nonpetitioning city or village may be contested by the town if DOA
determines that the annexation is not in the public interest and if the annexation is
commenced during the shorter of the following periods: 1) the period of 270 days
beginning after the city or village refuses to engage in mediation; or 2) the period
beginning after the city or village refuses to engage in mediation until the city or village
agrees to engage in mediation (the latter assumes that the city or village may agree to
engage in mediation after first refusing).
Paragraph (d) provides for selection of a mediator, states the general role of the
mediator, establishes a mediation period, and apportions the cost of mediation.
Paragraph (e) links the mediated agreement procedure to other provisions in
current s. 66.0307. Subject to the specified differences, a cooperative plan developed
under the new procedure is subject to the content, procedure, approval, and other
requirements under s. 66.0307.
Paragraph (f) provides that, once the mediated agreement procedure is invoked by
a municipality, any contested annexation commenced within the next three years
involving the petitioning and nonpetitioning municipality is subject to a requirement
that the judge, unless the nonpetitioning municipality objects, order the parties to select
a settlement alternative under the current ADR statute. This provision is not intended
to affect the court's discretionary authority under s. 802.12, notwithstanding the
objection of the nonpetitioning (or petitioning) municipality.
AB254, s. 30
1Section
30. 66.0307 (5) (c) 1. of the statutes is amended to read:
AB254,22,32
66.0307
(5) (c) 1. The content of the plan under sub. (3) (c) to (e) is sufficient
3to enable the department to make the determinations under subds. 2. to
5m 5.
AB254, s. 31
4Section
31. 66.0307 (5) (c) 2. of the statutes is amended to read:
AB254,23,3
166.0307
(5) (c) 2. The cooperative plan is consistent with
each participating
2municipality's comprehensive plan and with current state laws, municipal
3regulations
, and administrative rules that apply to the territory affected by the plan.
Note: Revises one of DOA's approval criteria for a cooperative plan to reflect the
new general requirement that the cooperative plan be consistent with each municipality's
comprehensive plan.
AB254, s. 32
4Section
32
. 66.0307 (5) (c) 4. of the statutes is repealed.
Note: Repeals the following DOA approval criterion as unnecessary in light of the
general requirement that the cooperative plan be consistent with each municipality's
comprehensive plan: