Amendment SSA2-SB66

SENATE SUBSTITUTE AMENDMENT 2, TO 2009 SENATE BILL 66

November 3, 2009 - Offered by Senator Sullivan.

SB66-SSA2,2,9 An Act to repeal 342.12 (4) (c) 1. b., 343.301 (1) (title) and (a), 343.301 (2), 346.65 (6), 346.65 (8), 973.09 (1) (d) 1., 973.09 (1) (d) 2. and 973.09 (1) (d) 3.; to renumber and amend 343.301 (1) (c), 343.301 (1) (d), 346.65 (2) (f) and 973.09 (1) (d) (intro.); to consolidate, renumber and amend 343.301 (1) (b) 1. and 2.; to amend 165.755 (1) (b), 302.46 (1) (a), 340.01 (46m) (c), 342.12 (4) (c) 1. c., 342.13 (1), 343.10 (2) (a) (intro.), 343.10 (5) (a) 3., 343.23 (2) (b), 343.30 (1q) (b) 2., 343.30 (1q) (b) 3., 343.30 (1q) (b) 4., 343.30 (1q) (c) 1. (intro.), 343.301 (title), 343.305 (8) (b) 5. (intro.), 343.305 (8) (c) 5., 343.38 (2), 343.39 (1) (a), 345.47 (1) (c), 346.65 (2) (am) 3., 346.65 (2) (am) 4., 346.65 (2) (am) 6., 346.65 (2) (am) 7., 346.65 (2) (bm), 346.65 (2) (cm), 346.65 (2c), 346.65 (2g) (a), 346.65 (2g) (ag), 346.65 (2j) (am) 3., 346.65 (2j) (bm), 346.65 (2j) (cm), 346.65 (2q), 346.65 (3m), 346.65 (3r), 346.65 (7), 346.655 (1), 347.413 (title) and (1), 347.417 (1), 347.417 (2), 347.50 (1s), 757.05 (1) (a), 814.60 (1), 814.63 (1) (c), 814.63 (2), 814.65 (1), 814.85 (1) (a), 814.86 (1), 969.01 (2) (a) and 973.15 (8) (a) 3.; to repeal and recreate 343.10 (2) (a) (intro.), 343.23 (2) (b), 343.305 (10m), 814.65 (1), 814.85 (1) (a), 814.86 (1), 940.09 (1d) and 940.25 (1d); and to create 25.40 (1) (a) 3m., 110.10 (4m), 303.08 (10r), 343.10 (2) (f), 343.21 (1) (jr), 343.30 (1r), 343.301 (1g), 343.301 (1m), 343.301 (3) (b), 343.301 (5), 343.305 (10g), 343.31 (4), 346.65 (2) (am) 4m., 346.65 (2) (dm), 346.65 (2) (f) 1., 346.65 (2j) (cr), 346.65 (3p), 347.50 (1t), 814.75 (9m), 814.76 (7m), 814.78 (7m), 814.79 (4r), 973.05 (2m) (rm) and 973.09 (2) (am) of the statutes; relating to: operating a vehicle while intoxicated, granting rule-making authority, and providing a penalty.

Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau

This substitute amendment makes a number of changes relating to operating a vehicle under the influence of an intoxicant (OWI-related offense), including the following:

1. Under current law, if a person is convicted of a second OWI-related offense, a judge may immobilize the person's motor vehicles or require that the person's operating privilege be limited to operating vehicles that are equipped with an ignition interlock device. If a person is convicted of a third or subsequent OWI-related offense within five years, a judge must limit the person's operating privilege to operating vehicles that are equipped with an ignition interlock device unless the judge orders that the person's motor vehicles be immobilized or seized and sold at auction.

Current law requires the person to pay for the costs of installing and monitoring the ignition interlock device on every motor vehicle he or she owns. If the judge determines that this would work a hardship to the person, current law allows the judge to require an ignition interlock device on some, but not all, of the person's motor vehicles.

Under current law, no one may remove, disconnect, tamper with, or otherwise circumvent the operation of an ignition interlock device. A person who does so may be required to forfeit not less than $150 nor more than $600 for the first offense and, for a second or subsequent offense within five years, may be fined not less than $300 nor more than $1,000, or imprisoned for not more than six months, or both.

This substitute amendment eliminates the option of ordering the person's vehicle to be immobilized or seized and sold at auction. The substitute amendment makes it mandatory for a judge to require that the person's operating privilege be limited, for a minimum of one year, to operating vehicles that are equipped with an ignition interlock device if either of the following are true: 1) the person commits a first OWI-related offense with an alcohol concentration of 0.15 or more; or 2) the person commits a second OWI-related offense.

Under the substitute amendment, with some exceptions, the judge must order that every motor vehicle the person owns be equipped with an ignition interlock device. If the judge determines that the person's income is at or below 150 percent of the federal poverty level, the person is required to pay a $50 surcharge upon the installation of the first ignition interlock device and, for each ignition interlock device, half of the installation cost, and one-half of the cost per day toward the cost of monitoring the ignition interlock device. A person whose income is above 150 percent of the federal poverty level is required to pay the surcharge and assume the full cost of installing and monitoring each ignition interlock device. Under the substitute amendment, if a person who is ordered to do so fails to pay the surcharge or fails to have an ignition interlock device installed, he or she may not obtain an occupational license. Moneys generated by the surcharge are retained by the counties.

Under the substitute amendment, a court may order a person who removes, disconnects, tampers with, or otherwise circumvents the operation of an ignition interlock device to be imprisoned for not more than six months for a first offense. The substitute amendment also subjects a person who fails to have an ignition interlock device installed as ordered by the court to the same penalties as a person who removes, disconnects, tampers with, or otherwise circumvents the operation of an ignition interlock device.

2. Under current law, a person who commits two OWI-related offenses may be eligible for an occupational license after a waiting period of 60 days, and a person with three or more OWI-related offenses may be eligible for an occupational license after a waiting period of 90 days. However, if the person committed two or more OWI-related offenses within five years, he or she is not eligible for an occupational license for a year. Under current law, a person whose operating privilege is suspended or revoked must pay a $50 fee to reinstate his or her operating privilege when the period of suspension or revocation is over. Funds generated from this fee are deposited into the transportation fund.

Under the substitute amendment, a person with two or more OWI-related offenses may be eligible for an occupational license after a waiting period of 45 days. Under the substitute amendment, a person whose operating privilege is revoked for an OWI-related offense must pay, in addition to the $50 reinstatement fee, an additional $40 to have his or her operating privileges reinstated. Funds generated from the additional fee are deposited into the general fund.

3. Under current law, a person who is subject to a forfeiture or a fine for violating most state laws or local ordinances is also liable for a variety of penalty surcharges and court fees. In addition, a person who commits an OWI-related offense is liable for a penalty surcharge for driver improvement programs and is required to comply with an alcohol and other drug assessment before he or she is eligible for reinstatement of his or her driving privileges.

Currently, a person who commits his or her first OWI-related offense and who has a blood alcohol concentration between 0.08 and 0.099 at the time of the offense is not liable for the surcharges or fees and does not need to comply with an alcohol or other drug assessment program. Further, the Department of Transportation (DOT) must purge its records of a first offense related to driving while intoxicated after ten years; the department keeps all other records of offenses related to driving while intoxicated permanently.

Under this substitute amendment, a person who commits his or her first OWI-related offense and who has a blood alcohol concentration between 0.08 and 0.099 at the time of the violation is liable for the surcharges or fees and must comply with an alcohol or other drug assessment program before his or her driving privileges may be reinstated. Under this substitute amendment, DOT must keep a record of this offense permanently.

4. Under current law, a person who commits an OWI-related offense is subject to a forfeiture or fine and, for a second or subsequent offense, a period of imprisonment. Currently, a person who commits a first OWI-related offense is subject to a forfeiture between $150 and $300. A person who commits a second OWI-related offense is subject to a fine between $350 and $1,100 and may be imprisoned for not less than five days nor more than six months, a person who commits a third offense is subject to a fine between $600 and $2,000 and may be imprisoned for not less than 30 days nor more than one year, a person who commits a fourth offense may be fined between $600 and $2,000 and may be imprisoned for not less than 60 days nor more than one year.

Upon committing a fifth or sixth OWI-related offense, a person is guilty of a Class H felony, and is subject to a minimum fine of $600, a six-month minimum term of imprisonment, and a maximum term of imprisonment of six years. A seventh, eighth, or ninth OWI-related offense is a Class G felony, and the person is subject to a maximum fine of $25,000 and a maximum term of imprisonment of ten years. A tenth or subsequent OWI-related offense is a Class F felony, and the person is subject to a maximum fine of $25,000, and a maximum term of imprisonment of 12 years and six months.

Under current law, a person who is sentenced for a felony is sentenced to a bifurcated sentence, and the person serves a portion of his or her sentence confined in a prison and a portion under extended supervision outside of prison.

This substitute amendment makes a first OWI-related offense a crime if, at the time of the offense, a child under the age of 16 was present in the vehicle involved in the offense. Under the substitute amendment, the penalties for committing this crime are the same as for committing a second OWI-related offense.

The substitute amendment increases the minimum period of imprisonment for a third OWI-related offense to 45 days. The substitute amendment makes a fourth OWI-related offense committed within five years of a prior offense a Class H felony and requires a person who commits a fourth OWI-related offense within five years to pay a minimum fine of $600 and to serve a minimum term of six months' imprisonment. The substitute amendment requires a person who commits a seventh, eighth, or ninth OWI-related offense to serve a minimum period of confinement or three years in prison under a bifurcated sentence and requires a person who commits a tenth or subsequent OWI-related offense to serve a minimum period of confinement of four years in prison under a bifurcated sentence.

5. Under current law, a person who commits an OWI-related offense and causes injury to another is subject to a fine of not less than $300 nor more than $2,000, imprisonment for not less than 30 days nor more than one year, or both.

Under this substitute amendment, a person who commits a second or subsequent OWI-related offense and causes injury to another person is guilty of a Class H felony, and is subject to a fine up to $10,000, imprisonment for not more than six years, or both.

6. 2005 Wisconsin Act 389 created a pilot program for sentencing persons in Winnebago County who are convicted of certain second or third OWI-related offenses. Under that act, the period of imprisonment for an OWI-related offense in Winnebago County may be reduced if the violator successfully completes a period of probation that includes alcohol and other drug treatment. A person may complete a treatment program and receive a reduced period of imprisonment only once.

This substitute amendment expands the sentencing option to any county that opts to allow a violator to successfully complete a period of probation that includes alcohol and other drug treatment in exchange for a shorter period of imprisonment. The substitute amendment allows these counties to offer this sentencing option to persons who commit a fourth OWI-related offense.

7. Under current law, a person who commits an OWI-related offense has his or her operating privileges revoked for a specified period. The period of revocation lengthens with each subsequent OWI-related offense, and generally begins on the date on which the person commits the OWI-related offense.

Under this substitute amendment, the period of revocation begins on the date on which the person commits the OWI-related offense, but the period of revocation is extended by the number of days that the person is required to spend in jail or prison.

8. Under current law, after a person is convicted of most crimes, the trial court may withhold the person's sentence, or impose a sentence of imprisonment but stay the imposition of imprisonment, and place the person on probation for a period of time. If the crime carries a mandatory minimum period of incarceration of one year or less, the person must be incarcerated for at least the mandatory minimum period as a condition of his or her probation.

Under current law, a trial court may not place a person on probation if the person has committed a second or third OWI-related offense or three or fewer offenses related to operating a commercial vehicle or causing injury while operating a vehicle while intoxicated or with a prohibited alcohol concentration. A trial court may place a person who commits more than three of these offenses on probation under current law; the maximum period of probation for a fourth OWI-related offence is two years.

Under this substitute amendment, a trial court may place a person who commits any of those offenses on probation. Under the substitute amendment, a person who commits an offense that carries a mandatory minimum period of incarceration of one year or less must be incarcerated for at least the mandatory minimum period as a condition of his or her probation. The substitute amendment also increases the maximum period of probation for a fourth OWI-related offence to three years.

9. Under current law, a person who is convicted of any criminal offense pays a $20 processing fee to the clerk of court. Half of this amount is retained by the county, and half goes to the general fund.

This substitute amendment increases the fee to $163. Under the substitute amendment, the county forwards 93.87 percent of the fees it collects for deposit into the general fund and retains 6 percent for use by the county.

10. Under current law, a trial court may, at its discretion, release a person who has been convicted of a crime from imprisonment until the time of sentencing. Current law also allows a sentencing court to delay the execution of a sentence of imprisonment for up to 60 days, unless the court finds that there is legal cause to delay the execution of the sentence for a longer period or unless the court places the person on probation. Additionally, under current law, a court may allow a person to participate in the Huber Law program. The Huber Law program allows a person sentenced to a county jail or confined in a county jail as a sanction while the person is on extended supervision to leave the jail for certain purposes, including to work, seek work, attend school, perform community service, attend certain court proceedings, or obtain certain treatment or counseling services.

Under this substitute amendment, if a person has been convicted of a third or subsequent OWI-related offense, a court may not release the person after conviction but before sentencing or delay the execution of a sentence of imprisonment unless the court finds that there is legal cause to delay the execution of the sentence or unless the court places the person on probation. The substitute amendment also requires a person for whom a judge approves participation in the Huber Law program to submit, within two weeks of his or her sentencing date, proof that he or she has complied with an order to install an ignition interlock device on his or her vehicles. A person who fails to submit this proof to the sheriff in the county where he or she is incarcerated within the required period may not be released under the Huber Law program.

The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:

SB66-SSA2, s. 1 Section 1. 25.40 (1) (a) 3m. of the statutes is created to read:

SB66-SSA2,6,3 25.40 (1) (a) 3m. Revenues collected under s. 343.21 (1) (jr) which shall be paid into the general fund.

SB66-SSA2, s. 2 Section 2. 110.10 (4m) of the statutes is created to read:

SB66-SSA2,7,4 110.10 (4m) Requiring ignition interlock device providers operating in this state to accept, as payment in full for equipping a motor vehicle with an ignition interlock device and for maintaining the ignition interlock device, the amount ordered by the court under s. 343.301 (3) (b), if applicable.

SB66-SSA2, s. 3 Section 3. 165.755 (1) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB66-SSA2,7,13 165.755 (1) (b) A court may not impose the crime laboratories and drug law enforcement surcharge under par. (a) for a violation of s. 101.123 (2) (a), (am) 1., (ar), (bm), (br), or (bv) or (5) (b), for a first violation of s. 23.33 (4c) (a) 2., 30.681 (1) (b) 1., 346.63 (1) (b), or 350.101 (1) (b), if the person who committed the violation had a blood alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more but less than 0.1 at the time of the violation, or for a violation of a state law or municipal or county ordinance involving a nonmoving traffic violation, a violation under s. 343.51 (1m) (b), or a safety belt use violation under s. 347.48 (2m).

SB66-SSA2, s. 4 Section 4. 302.46 (1) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB66-SSA2,8,2 302.46 (1) (a) If a court imposes a fine or forfeiture for a violation of state law or for a violation of a municipal or county ordinance except for a violation of s. 101.123 (2) (a), (am) 1., (ar), (bm), (br), or (bv) or (5), or for a first violation of s. 23.33 (4c) (a) 2., 30.681 (1) (b) 1., 346.63 (1) (b), or 350.101 (1) (b), if the person who committed the violation had a blood alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more but less than 0.1 at the time of the violation, or for a violation of state laws or municipal or county ordinances involving nonmoving traffic violations, violations under s. 343.51 (1m) (b), or safety belt use violations under s. 347.48 (2m), the court, in addition, shall impose a jail surcharge under ch. 814 in an amount of 1 percent of the fine or forfeiture imposed or $10, whichever is greater. If multiple offenses are involved, the court shall determine the jail surcharge on the basis of each fine or forfeiture. If a fine or forfeiture is suspended in whole or in part, the court shall reduce the jail surcharge in proportion to the suspension.

SB66-SSA2, s. 5 Section 5. 303.08 (10r) of the statutes is created to read:

SB66-SSA2,8,7 303.08 (10r) The sheriff may not permit a prisoner who is subject to an order under s. 343.301 (1g) to leave the jail under sub. (1) unless, within 2 weeks after the court issues the order, the person submits proof to the sheriff that an ignition interlock device has been installed in each motor vehicle to which the order applies.

SB66-SSA2, s. 6 Section 6. 340.01 (46m) (c) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB66-SSA2,8,11 340.01 (46m) (c) If the person is subject to an order under s. 343.301 or if the person has 3 or more prior convictions, suspensions or revocations, as counted under s. 343.307 (1), an alcohol concentration of more than 0.02.

SB66-SSA2, s. 7 Section 7. 342.12 (4) (c) 1. b. of the statutes is repealed.

SB66-SSA2, s. 8 Section 8. 342.12 (4) (c) 1. c. of the statutes is amended to read:

SB66-SSA2,8,16 342.12 (4) (c) 1. c. The person requesting the issuance of the certificate of title files an affidavit with the department attesting that the conditions condition under subd. 1. a. and b. are is met.

SB66-SSA2, s. 9 Section 9. 342.13 (1) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB66-SSA2,9,2 342.13 (1) If a certificate of title is lost, stolen, mutilated, or destroyed, or becomes illegible, the owner or legal representative of the owner named in the certificate, as shown by the records of the department, shall promptly make application for and may obtain a replacement upon furnishing information satisfactory to the department. The replacement certificate of title shall contain a notation, in a form determined by the department, identifying the certificate as a replacement certificate that may be subject to the rights of a person under the original certificate. If applicable under s. 346.65 (6), the replacement certificate of title shall include the notation "Per section 346.65 (6) of the Wisconsin statutes, ownership of this motor vehicle may not be transferred without prior court approval".

SB66-SSA2, s. 10 Section 10. 343.10 (2) (a) (intro.) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB66-SSA2,9,5 343.10 (2) (a) (intro.) Except as provided in pars. (b) to (e) (f), a person is eligible for an occupational license if the following conditions are satisfied:

SB66-SSA2, s. 11 Section 11. 343.10 (2) (a) (intro.) of the statutes, as affected by 2007 Wisconsin Act 20 and 2009 Wisconsin Act .... (this act), is repealed and recreated to read:

SB66-SSA2,9,10 343.10 (2) (a) (intro.) Except as provided in pars. (b) to (f), and subject to s. 343.165 (5), a person is eligible for an occupational license if the following conditions are satisfied:

SB66-SSA2, s. 12 Section 12. 343.10 (2) (f) of the statutes is created to read:

SB66-SSA2,9,17 343.10 (2) (f) If the court orders under s. 343.301 (1g) that the person's operating privilege for the operation of "Class D" vehicles be restricted to operating vehicles that are equipped with an ignition interlock device, no occupational license may be granted until the person pays the surcharge under s. 343.301 (5) and submits proof that an ignition interlock device has been installed in each motor vehicle to which the order under s. 343.301 applies.

SB66-SSA2, s. 13 Section 13. 343.10 (5) (a) 3. of the statutes is amended to read:

SB66-SSA2,9,26 343.10 (5) (a) 3. If the applicant has 2 or more prior convictions, suspensions, or revocations, as counted under s. 343.307 (1), the The occupational license of the applicant shall restrict the applicant's operation under the occupational license to vehicles that are equipped with a functioning ignition interlock device if the court has ordered under s. 343.301 (1) (a) 1. or 2. (1g) that the person's operating privilege for Class D vehicles be restricted to operating vehicles that are equipped with an ignition interlock device or has ordered under s. 346.65 (6) (a) 1., 1999 stats., that the motor vehicle owned by the person and used in the violation or improper refusal be equipped with an ignition interlock device. A person to whom a restriction under this subdivision applies violates that restriction if he or she removes or disconnects an ignition interlock device, requests or permits another to blow into an ignition interlock device or to start a motor vehicle equipped with an ignition interlock device for the purpose of providing the person an operable motor vehicle without the necessity of first submitting a sample of his or her breath to analysis by the ignition interlock device. If, or otherwise tampers with or circumvents the operation of the ignition interlock device. Except as provided in s. 343.301 (3) (b), if the occupational license restricts the applicant's operation to a vehicle that is equipped with an ignition interlock device, the applicant shall be liable for the reasonable costs of equipping the vehicle with the ignition interlock device.

SB66-SSA2, s. 14 Section 14. 343.21 (1) (jr) of the statutes is created to read:

SB66-SSA2,10,16 343.21 (1) (jr) In addition to any other fee under this subsection, for reinstatement of an operating privilege previously revoked or suspended under s. 343.305 (7) or resulting from the commission of an offense listed in s. 343.307, $40.

SB66-SSA2, s. 15 Section 15. 343.23 (2) (b) of the statutes, as affected by 2009 Wisconsin Act 28, section 2923, is amended to read:

SB66-SSA2,11,18 343.23 (2) (b) The information specified in pars. (a) and (am) must be filed by the department so that the complete operator's record is available for the use of the secretary in determining whether operating privileges of such person shall be suspended, revoked, canceled, or withheld, or the person disqualified, in the interest of public safety. The record of suspensions, revocations, and convictions that would be counted under s. 343.307 (2) shall be maintained permanently, except that the department shall purge the record of a first violation of s. 23.33 (4c) (a) 2., 30.681 (1) (b) 1., 346.63 (1) (b), or 350.101 (1) (b) after 10 years, if the person who committed the violation had a blood alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more but less than 0.1 at the time of the violation, if the person does not have a commercial driver license, if the violation was not committed by a person operating a commercial motor vehicle, and if the person has no other suspension, revocation, or conviction that would be counted under s. 343.307 during that 10-year period. The record of convictions for disqualifying offenses under s. 343.315 (2) (h) shall be maintained for at least 10 years. The record of convictions for disqualifying offenses under s. 343.315 (2) (f), (j), and (L) and all records specified in par. (am), shall be maintained for at least 3 years. The record of convictions for disqualifying offenses under s. 343.315 (2) (a) to (e) shall be maintained permanently, except that 5 years after a licensee transfers residency to another state such record may be transferred to another state of licensure of the licensee if that state accepts responsibility for maintaining a permanent record of convictions for disqualifying offenses. Such reports and records may be cumulative beyond the period for which a license is granted, but the secretary, in exercising the power of suspension granted under s. 343.32 (2) may consider only those reports and records entered during the 4-year period immediately preceding the exercise of such power of suspension.

SB66-SSA2, s. 16 Section 16. 343.23 (2) (b) of the statutes, as affected by 2009 Wisconsin Acts 28, section 2924, and .... (this act), is repealed and recreated to read:

SB66-SSA2,12,15 343.23 (2) (b) The information specified in pars. (a) and (am) must be filed by the department so that the complete operator's record is available for the use of the secretary in determining whether operating privileges of such person shall be suspended, revoked, canceled, or withheld, or the person disqualified, in the interest of public safety. The record of suspensions, revocations, and convictions that would be counted under s. 343.307 (2) shall be maintained permanently. The record of convictions for disqualifying offenses under s. 343.315 (2) (h) shall be maintained for at least 10 years. The record of convictions for disqualifying offenses under s. 343.315 (2) (f), (j), and (L), and all records specified in par. (am), shall be maintained for at least 3 years. The record of convictions for disqualifying offenses under s. 343.315 (2) (a) to (e) shall be maintained permanently, except that 5 years after a licensee transfers residency to another state such record may be transferred to another state of licensure of the licensee if that state accepts responsibility for maintaining a permanent record of convictions for disqualifying offenses. Such reports and records may be cumulative beyond the period for which a license is granted, but the secretary, in exercising the power of suspension granted under s. 343.32 (2) may consider only those reports and records entered during the 4-year period immediately preceding the exercise of such power of suspension. The department shall maintain the digital images of documents specified in s. 343.165 (2) (a) for at least 10 years.

SB66-SSA2, s. 17 Section 17. 343.30 (1q) (b) 2. of the statutes is amended to read:

SB66-SSA2,12,20 343.30 (1q) (b) 2. Except as provided in sub. (1r) or subd. 3., 4. or 4m., for the first conviction, the court shall revoke the person's operating privilege for not less than 6 months nor more than 9 months. The person is eligible for an occupational license under s. 343.10 at any time.

SB66-SSA2, s. 18 Section 18. 343.30 (1q) (b) 3. of the statutes is amended to read:

SB66-SSA2,13,6 343.30 (1q) (b) 3. Except as provided in sub. (1r) or subd. 4m., if the number of convictions under ss. 940.09 (1) and 940.25 in the person's lifetime, plus the total number of other convictions, suspensions, and revocations counted under s. 343.307 (1) within a 10-year period, equals 2, the court shall revoke the person's operating privilege for not less than one year nor more than 18 months. After the first 60 45 days of the revocation period or, if the total number of convictions, suspensions, and revocations counted under this subdivision within any 5-year period equals 2 or more, after one year of the revocation period has elapsed, the person is eligible for an occupational license under s. 343.10 if he or she has completed the assessment and is complying with the driver safety plan ordered under par. (c).

SB66-SSA2, s. 19 Section 19. 343.30 (1q) (b) 4. of the statutes is amended to read:

SB66-SSA2,13,17 343.30 (1q) (b) 4. Except as provided in sub. (1r) or subd. 4m., if the number of convictions under ss. 940.09 (1) and 940.25 in the person's lifetime, plus the total number of other convictions, suspensions, and revocations counted under s. 343.307 (1), equals 3 or more, the court shall revoke the person's operating privilege for not less than 2 years nor more than 3 years. After the first 90 45 days of the revocation period or, if the total number of convictions, suspensions, and revocations counted under this subdivision within any 5-year period equals 2 or more, after one year of the revocation period has elapsed, the person is eligible for an occupational license under s. 343.10 if he or she has completed the assessment and is complying with the driver safety plan ordered under par. (c).

SB66-SSA2, s. 20 Section 20. 343.30 (1q) (c) 1. (intro.) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB66-SSA2,14,4 343.30 (1q) (c) 1. (intro.) Except as provided in subd. 1. a. or b., and except for a first violation of s. 346.63 (1) (b), if the person who committed the violation had a blood alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more but less than 0.1 at the time of the violation, the court shall order the person to submit to and comply with an assessment by an approved public treatment facility as defined in s. 51.45 (2) (c) for examination of the person's use of alcohol, controlled substances or controlled substance analogs and development of a driver safety plan for the person. The court shall notify the department of transportation of the assessment order. The court shall notify the person that noncompliance with assessment or the driver safety plan will result in revocation of the person's operating privilege until the person is in compliance. The assessment order shall:

SB66-SSA2, s. 21 Section 21. 343.30 (1r) of the statutes is created to read:

SB66-SSA2,14,8 343.30 (1r) For any revocation the court orders under sub. (1q), the court shall extend the revocation period by the number of days to which the court sentences the person to imprisonment in a jail or prison for an offense related to the refusal.

SB66-SSA2, s. 22 Section 22. 343.301 (title) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB66-SSA2,14,11 343.301 (title) Installation of ignition interlock device or immobilization of a motor vehicle.

SB66-SSA2, s. 23 Section 23. 343.301 (1) (title) and (a) of the statutes are repealed.

SB66-SSA2, s. 24 Section 24. 343.301 (1) (b) 1. and 2. of the statutes are consolidated, renumbered 343.301 (2m) and amended to read:

SB66-SSA2,15,2 343.301 (2m) The court may shall restrict the operating privilege restriction under par. (a) 1. sub. (1g) for a period of not less than one year nor more than the maximum operating privilege revocation period permitted for the refusal or violation. 2. The court shall order the operating privilege restriction and the installation of an ignition interlock device under par. (a) 2. for a period of not less than one year nor more than the maximum operating privilege revocation period permitted for the refusal or violation, beginning one year after the operating privilege revocation period begins on the date the department issues any license granted under this chapter, except that if the maximum operating privilege revocation period is less than one year, the court shall restrict the operating privilege under sub. (1g) for one year. The court may order the installation of an ignition interlock device under sub. (1g) immediately upon issuing an order under sub. (1g).

SB66-SSA2, s. 25 Section 25. 343.301 (1) (c) of the statutes is renumbered 343.301 (3) (a) and amended to read:

SB66-SSA2,15,7 343.301 (3) (a) If Except as provided in par. (b), if the court enters an order under par. (a) sub. (1g), the person shall be liable for the reasonable cost of equipping and maintaining any ignition interlock device installed on his or her motor vehicle.