Relating to: limiting a city's and village's use of direct annexation and authorizing limited town challenges to an annexation.
The question was: Shall Senate Bill 172 be ordered to a third reading?
Motion carried.
Representative Nelson asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill
172 be given a third reading. Granted.
The question was: Senate Bill 172 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in?
Motion carried.
Representative Nelson asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill
172 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
__________________
Senate Bill 279
Relating to: financial assistance related to bioenergy feedstocks, biorefineries, and conversion to biomass energy; the definition of the term agricultural use for the purpose of determining the assessed value of a parcel of land; requiring a strategic bioenergy feedstock assessment; creation of a bioenergy council; the agricultural and forestry diversification programs; biofuels training assessment; a study of regulatory burdens relating to biofuel production facilities; marketing orders and agreements for bioenergy feedstocks; exempting personal renewable fuel production and use from the motor vehicle fuel tax, the petroleum inspection fee, and business tax registration requirements; an income and franchise tax credit for installing or retrofitting pumps that mix motor vehicle fuels from separate storage tanks; offering gasoline that is not blended with ethanol to motor fuel dealers; state renewable motor vehicle fuels sales goals; required sales of renewable motor vehicle fuels; use of petroleum-based transportation fuels by state vehicles; use of alternative fuels in flex fuel vehicles owned by the state; use of public alternative fuel refueling facilities; duties of the Office of Energy Independence; granting rule-making authority; requiring the exercise of rule-making authority; making appropriations; and providing penalties.
The question was: Shall Senate Bill 279 be ordered to a third reading?
Motion carried.
Representative Nelson asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill
279 be given a third reading. Granted.
The question was: Senate Bill 279 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in?
The roll was taken.
The result follows:
Ayes - Representatives Ballweg, Barca, Benedict, Berceau, Bernard Schaber, Bies, Black, Brooks, Clark, Colon, Cullen, Danou, Dexter, Fields, J. Fitzgerald, Garthwaite, Grigsby, Gunderson, Hebl, Hilgenberg, Hintz, Hixson, Hraychuck, Hubler, Huebsch, Jorgensen, Kaufert, Kessler, Krusick, Mason, Milroy, Molepske Jr., Nelson, Nerison, A. Ott, Parisi, Pasch, Petrowski, Pocan, Pope-Roberts, Pridemore, Radcliffe, Richards, Ripp, Roys, Schneider, Seidel, Sherman, Shilling, Sinicki, Smith, Soletski, Spanbauer, Staskunas, Steinbrink, Suder, Tauchen, Toles, Townsend, Van Akkeren, Van Roy, Vruwink, M. Williams, Wood, Young, Zepnick and Speaker Sheridan - 67.
Noes - Representatives Davis, Friske, Gottlieb, Gundrum, Honadel, Kerkman, Kestell, Kleefisch, Knodl, Kramer, LeMahieu, Lothian, Meyer, Montgomery, Mursau, Murtha, Nass, Newcomer, Nygren, J. Ott, Petersen, Rhoades, Roth, Stone, Strachota, Turner, Vos, Vukmir, Ziegelbauer, Zigmunt and Zipperer - 31.
Absent or not voting - Representative A. Williams - 1.
Representative Turner asked unanimous consent to be recorded as voting "Yes" on the previous question. Granted.
Representative Nelson asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill
279 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
__________________
Senate Bill 321
Relating to: operation of neighborhood electric vehicles.
The question was: Shall Assembly substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 321 be adopted?
Motion carried.
The question was: Shall Senate Bill 321 be ordered to a third reading?
Motion carried.
Representative Nelson asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill
321 be given a third reading. Granted.
The question was: Senate Bill 321 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in as amended?
Motion carried.
Representative Nelson asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill
321 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
__________________
Senate Bill 323
Relating to: requiring newborn hearing screening.
The question was: Shall Senate Bill 323 be ordered to a third reading?
Motion carried.
Representative Nelson asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill
323 be given a third reading. Granted.
The question was: Senate Bill 323 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in?
Motion carried.
Representative Nelson asked unanimous consent the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill
323 be immediately messaged to the Senate.
Representative Schneider objected.
Representative Nelson moved that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 323 be immediately messaged to the Senate.
The question was: Shall the rules be suspended and Senate Bill 323 be immediately messaged to the Senate?
The roll was taken.
The result follows:
Ayes - Representatives Ballweg, Barca, Benedict, Berceau, Bernard Schaber, Bies, Black, Brooks, Clark, Colon, Cullen, Danou, Dexter, Fields, J. Fitzgerald, Garthwaite, Gottlieb, Grigsby, Gunderson, Gundrum, Hebl, Hintz, Hixson, Honadel, Hraychuck, Hubler, Huebsch, Jorgensen, Kaufert, Kerkman, Kessler, Krusick, LeMahieu, Mason, Milroy, Molepske Jr., Montgomery, Mursau, Nass, Nelson, Nerison, Nygren, J. Ott, Parisi, Pasch, Petrowski, Pocan, Pope-Roberts, Radcliffe, Rhoades, Richards, Ripp, Roth, Roys, Seidel, Shilling, Sinicki, Smith, Soletski, Spanbauer, Staskunas, Steinbrink, Strachota, Tauchen, Toles, Townsend, Turner, Van Akkeren, Van Roy, Vukmir, Wood, Young, Zepnick, Ziegelbauer, Zigmunt and Speaker Sheridan - 76.
Noes - Representatives Davis, Friske, Hilgenberg, Kestell, Kleefisch, Knodl, Kramer, Lothian, Meyer, Murtha, Newcomer, Petersen, Pridemore, Schneider, Sherman, Stone, Suder, Vos, Vruwink, M. Williams and Zipperer - 21.
Absent or not voting - Representatives A. Ott and A. Williams - 2.
Motion carried.
Representative A. Ott asked unanimous consent to be recorded as voting "Aye" on the previous question. Granted.
__________________
Representative Barca asked unanimous consent that the Assembly stand recessed. Granted.
The Assembly stood recessed.
11:24 P.M.
__________________
11:54 P.M.
The Assembly reconvened.
Speaker Pro Tempore Staskunas in the chair.
__________________
Senate Bill 338
Relating to: maximum amount of funeral and burial expenses under the funeral, burial, and cemetery expenses program.
The question was: Shall Senate Bill 338 be ordered to a third reading?
Representative Nelson asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill
338 be given a third reading. Granted.
The question was: Senate Bill 338 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in?
Motion carried.
Representative Nelson asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill
338 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
__________________
Senate Bill 341
Relating to: reckless bodily harm to a child and providing a penalty.
Representative Hubler asked unanimous consent that Assembly amendment 1 to Senate Bill 341 be laid on the table. Granted.
The question was: Shall Senate Bill 341 be ordered to a third reading?
Motion carried.
Representative Nelson asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill
341 be given a third reading. Granted.
The question was: Senate Bill 341 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in?
Motion carried.
Representative Nelson asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill
341 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
__________________
Senate Bill 342
Relating to: pupils attending a school district under the Open Enrollment Program who are habitually truant.
The question was: Shall Senate Bill 342 be ordered to a third reading?